Dynamic temporal modulation of somatosensory processing during reaching

Sensorimotor control of human action integrates feedforward policies that predict future body states with online sensory feedback. These predictions lead to a suppression of the associated feedback signals. Here, we examine whether somatosensory processing throughout a goal-directed movement is constantly suppressed or dynamically tuned so that online feedback processing is enhanced at critical moments of the movement. Participants reached towards their other hand in the absence of visual input and detected a probing tactile stimulus on their moving or static hand. Somatosensory processing on the moving hand was dynamically tuned over the time course of reaching, being hampered in early and late stages of the movement, but, interestingly, recovering around the time of maximal speed. This novel finding of temporal somatosensory tuning was further corroborated in a second experiment, in which larger movement amplitudes shifted the absolute time of maximal speed later in the movement. We further show that the release from suppression on the moving limb was temporally coupled with enhanced somatosensory processing on the target hand. We discuss these results in the context of optimal feedforward control and suggest that somatosensory processing is dynamically tuned during the time course of reaching by enhancing sensory processing at critical moments of the movement.

[1]  Alessandro Farnè,et al.  Vision facilitates tactile perception when grasping an object , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[2]  Gunnar Blohm,et al.  Vibrotactile information improves proprioceptive reaching target localization , 2018, PloS one.

[3]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  Predicted reach consequences drive time course of tactile suppression , 2018, Behavioural Brain Research.

[4]  Konstantina Kilteni,et al.  Functional Connectivity between the Cerebellum and Somatosensory Areas Implements the Attenuation of Self-Generated Touch , 2020, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[5]  Eli Brenner,et al.  Robust movement segmentation by combining multiple sources of information , 2010, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.

[6]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Mere Expectation to Move Causes Attenuation of Sensory Signals , 2008, PloS one.

[7]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  Optimal feedback control as a theory of motor coordination , 2002, Nature Neuroscience.

[8]  A. Faisal,et al.  Noise in the nervous system , 2008, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[9]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Making smooth moves , 2022 .

[10]  Michael Dimitriou,et al.  Human Muscle Spindle Sensitivity Reflects the Balance of Activity between Antagonistic Muscles , 2014, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  M. Ernst,et al.  Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion , 2002, Nature.

[12]  W. Jiang,et al.  Modulation of lemniscal input during conditioned arm movements in the monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Michael I. Jordan,et al.  An internal model for sensorimotor integration. , 1995, Science.

[14]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  The role of visual processing on tactile suppression , 2018, PloS one.

[15]  S. Scott The computational and neural basis of voluntary motor control and planning , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation , 1998, Nature Neuroscience.

[17]  Francisco L Colino,et al.  Time Course of Tactile Gating in a Reach-to-Grasp and Lift Task , 2016, Journal of motor behavior.

[18]  G. Fitzgerald,et al.  'I. , 2019, Australian journal of primary health.

[19]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  Enhancement and Suppression of Tactile Signals During Reaching , 2017, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[20]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Constraints on human arm movement trajectories. , 1987, Canadian journal of psychology.

[21]  Patrick Haggard,et al.  Supplementary motor area provides an efferent signal for sensory suppression. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  Joan López-Moliner,et al.  Catching a gently thrown ball , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[23]  K. Fiehler,et al.  Somatosensory target information is used for reaching but not for saccadic eye movements. , 2020, Journal of Neurophysiology.

[24]  R. J. van Beers,et al.  Integration of proprioceptive and visual position-information: An experimentally supported model. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[25]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Why can't you tickle yourself? , 2000, Neuroreport.

[26]  G. Stelmach,et al.  Age-Related Differences in a Kinematic Analysis of Precued Movements , 1990, Canadian Journal on Aging / La Revue canadienne du vieillissement.

[27]  K. Fiehler,et al.  The influence of afferent input on somatosensory suppression during grasping , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[28]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Sensorimotor attenuation by central motor command signals in the absence of movement , 2006, Nature Neuroscience.

[29]  E. Brenner,et al.  Prediction in goal-directed action. , 2019, Journal of vision.

[30]  Emanuel Todorov,et al.  Evidence for the Flexible Sensorimotor Strategies Predicted by Optimal Feedback Control , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  Sukhwinder S. Shergill,et al.  Modulation of somatosensory processing by action , 2013, NeuroImage.

[32]  Daniel M. Wolpert,et al.  Forward Models for Physiological Motor Control , 1996, Neural Networks.

[33]  C. Spence,et al.  Changes in tactile sensitivity over the time-course of a goal-directed movement , 2010, Behavioural Brain Research.

[34]  K. Fiehler,et al.  Age effects on sensorimotor predictions: What drives increased tactile suppression during reaching? , 2019, Journal of vision.

[35]  Konrad Paul Kording,et al.  Bayesian integration in sensorimotor learning , 2004, Nature.

[36]  E. Brenner,et al.  A new view on grasping. , 1999, Motor control.

[37]  K. Pearson Proprioceptive regulation of locomotion , 1995, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[38]  F A Wichmann,et al.  Ning for Helpful Comments and Suggestions. This Paper Benefited Con- Siderably from Conscientious Peer Review, and We Thank Our Reviewers the Psychometric Function: I. Fitting, Sampling, and Goodness of Fit , 2001 .

[39]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Motor prediction , 2001, Current Biology.

[40]  T. Ebner,et al.  Cerebellar Purkinje Cell Simple Spike Discharge Encodes Movement Velocity in Primates during Visuomotor Arm Tracking , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[41]  Gordon Binsted,et al.  Availability of vision and tactile gating: vision enhances tactile sensitivity , 2016, Experimental Brain Research.

[42]  C. E. Chapman,et al.  Sensory perception during movement in man , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[43]  Konstantina Kilteni,et al.  Motor imagery involves predicting the sensory consequences of the imagined movement , 2018, Nature Communications.

[44]  David W Franklin,et al.  Time-to-Target Simplifies Optimal Control of Visuomotor Feedback Responses , 2019, eNeuro.

[45]  Anne C. Sittig,et al.  The precision of proprioceptive position sense , 1998, Experimental Brain Research.

[46]  Dimitris Voudouris,et al.  Anticipatory grasping control modulates somatosensory perception. , 2019, Journal of vision.

[47]  H. Ehrsson,et al.  Body ownership determines the attenuation of self-generated tactile sensations , 2017, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  A. Schwartz Motor cortical activity during drawing movements: single-unit activity during sinusoid tracing. , 1992, Journal of neurophysiology.

[49]  Romeo Chua,et al.  Relevance-dependent modulation of tactile suppression during active, passive and pantomime reach-to-grasp movements , 2018, Behavioural Brain Research.

[50]  Philip N. Sabes,et al.  Flexible strategies for sensory integration during motor planning , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[51]  R. C. Oldfield The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. , 1971, Neuropsychologia.

[52]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  Reach-relevant somatosensory signals modulate tactile suppression. , 2017, Journal of neurophysiology.

[53]  Katja Fiehler,et al.  Spatial specificity of tactile enhancement during reaching , 2017, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics.

[54]  D. Wolpert,et al.  The Temporal Evolution of Feedback Gains Rapidly Update to Task Demands , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[55]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[56]  Gavin Buckingham,et al.  Gating of vibrotactile detection during visually guided bimanual reaches , 2010, Experimental Brain Research.

[57]  D. Wolpert,et al.  Perception of the Consequences of Self-Action Is Temporally Tuned and Event Driven , 2005, Current Biology.