REFLECTANCE CALIBRATION SCHEME FOR AIRBORNE FRAME CAMERA IMAGES

Abstract. The image quality of photogrammetric images is influenced by various effects from outside the camera. One effect is the scattered light from the atmosphere that lowers contrast in the images and creates a colour shift towards the blue. Another is the changing illumination during the day which results in changing image brightness within an image block. In addition, there is the so-called bidirectional reflectance of the ground (BRDF effects) that is giving rise to a view and sun angle dependent brightness gradient in the image itself. To correct for the first two effects an atmospheric correction with reflectance calibration is chosen. The effects have been corrected successfully for ADS linescan sensor data by using a parametrization of the atmospheric quantities. Following Kaufman et al. the actual atmospheric condition is estimated by the brightness of a dark pixel taken from the image. The BRDF effects are corrected using a semi-empirical modelling of the brightness gradient. Both methods are now extended to frame cameras. Linescan sensors have a viewing geometry that is only dependent from the cross track view zenith angle. The difference for frame cameras now is to include the extra dimension of the view azimuth into the modelling. Since both the atmospheric correction and the BRDF correction require a model inversion with the help of image data, a different image sampling strategy is necessary which includes the azimuth angle dependence. For the atmospheric correction a sixth variable is added to the existing five variables visibility, view zenith angle, sun zenith angle, ground altitude, and flight altitude – thus multiplying the number of modelling input combinations for the offline-inversion. The parametrization has to reflect the view azimuth angle dependence. The BRDF model already contains the view azimuth dependence and is combined with a new sampling strategy.

[1]  Daniel Schläpfer,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC AND TOPOGRAPHIC CORRECTION OF PHOTOGRAMMETRIC AIRBORNE DIGITAL SCANNER DATA (ATCOR-ADS) , 2012 .

[2]  A. Strahler,et al.  On the derivation of kernels for kernel‐driven models of bidirectional reflectance , 1995 .

[3]  David Hernández López,et al.  An approach to the radiometric aerotriangulation of photogrammetric images , 2011 .

[4]  U. Beisl,et al.  ATMOSPHERIC CORRECTION , REFLECTANCE CALIBRATION AND BRDF CORRECTION FOR ADS 40 IMAGE DATA , 2008 .

[5]  Laure Chandelier,et al.  A Radiometric Aerial Triangulation for the Equalization of Digital Aerial Images and Orthoimages , 2009 .

[6]  R. Richter,et al.  Bandpass-resampling effects on the retrieval of radiance and surface reflectance. , 2000, Applied optics.

[7]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  VALIDATION OF THE RADIOMETRIC PROCESSING CHAIN OF THE LEICA ADS40 AIRBORNE PHOTOGRAMMETRIC SENSOR , 2010 .

[8]  U. Beisl Absolute spectroradiometric calibration of the ADS40 sensor , 2006 .

[9]  G. Campbell,et al.  Simple equation to approximate the bidirectional reflectance from vegetative canopies and bare soil surfaces. , 1985, Applied optics.

[10]  Y. Kaufman,et al.  Algorithm for atmospheric corrections of aircraft and satellite imagery , 1992 .

[11]  R. Ryan,et al.  Enhanced Absolute and Relative Radiometric Calibration for Digital Aerial Cameras , 2009 .

[12]  Eija Honkavaara,et al.  THE EUROSDR PROJECT "RADIOMETRIC ASPECTS OF DIGITAL PHOTOGRAMMETRIC IMAGES" – RESULTS OF THE EMPIRICAL PHASE , 2012 .

[13]  RADIOMETRIC PROCESSING OF ADS IMAGERY: USING ATMOSPHERIC AND BRDF CORRECTIONS IN PRODUCTION , 2010 .

[14]  A. Kuusk,et al.  A reflectance model for the homogeneous plant canopy and its inversion , 1989 .