Enhancement of the accuracy of single-epoch GPS positioning for long baselines by local ionospheric modelling

Single-epoch relative GPS positioning has many advantages, especially for monitoring dynamic targets. In this technique, errors occurring in previous epochs cannot affect the position accuracy at the current epoch, but careful processing is required, and resolving carrier phase ambiguities is essential. Statistical ambiguity resolution functions have been used to determine the best values of these ambiguities. The function inputs include as a minimum the known base station position, the approximate roving antenna “seed” position, and the dual-frequency carrier phase measurements from both receivers. We investigate different solutions to find the ambiguity function inputs that achieve the highest ambiguity resolution success rate. First, we address the rover seed position. A regionally filtered undifferenced pseudorange coordinate solution proves better than a double-differenced one. Multipath errors approximately repeat themselves every sidereal day in the case of static or quasi-static antennas; applying a sidereal filter to the pseudorange-derived positions mitigates their effects. Second, we address the relative carrier phase measurements, which for medium to long baselines are significantly affected by ionospheric propagation errors imperfectly removed during differencing. In addition to the International GNSS Service ionospheric model, we generate a local pseudorange-based ionospheric correction. Applying this correction improves the quality of the phase measurements, leading to more successful ambiguity resolution. Temporally smoothing the correction by means of a Kalman filter further improves the phase measurements. For baselines in the range 60–120 km, the mean absolute deviation of single-epoch coordinates improves to 10–20 cm, from 30–50 cm in the default case.

[1]  P. Steigenberger,et al.  Absolute phase center corrections of satellite and receiver antennas , 2005 .

[2]  Peter J. Clarke,et al.  GPS sidereal filtering: coordinate- and carrier-phase-level strategies , 2007 .

[3]  S. Lejeune,et al.  Ionospheric effects on relative positioning within a dense GPS network , 2011, GPS Solutions.

[4]  Per Enge,et al.  Special Issue on Global Positioning System , 1999, Proc. IEEE.

[5]  Gerald L. Mader,et al.  Rapid static and kinematic global positioning system solutions using the ambiguity function technique , 1992 .

[6]  A. Leick GPS satellite surveying , 1990 .

[7]  Peter S. Maybeck,et al.  Stochastic Models, Estimation And Control , 2012 .

[8]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[9]  J. Kouba A GUIDE TO USING INTERNATIONAL GNSS SERVICE (IGS) PRODUCTS , 2003 .

[10]  R. E. Kalman,et al.  New Results in Linear Filtering and Prediction Theory , 1961 .

[11]  P. A. Cross,et al.  GPS SINGLE EPOCH AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION , 1995 .

[12]  A. Niell Global mapping functions for the atmosphere delay at radio wavelengths , 1996 .

[13]  Charles C. Counselman,et al.  Miniature Interferometer Terminals for Earth Surveying: Ambiguity And Multipath with Global Positioning System , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[14]  Richard B. Langley,et al.  GPS Ambiguity Resolution and Validation: Methodologies, Trends and Issues , 2000 .

[15]  J. Saastamoinen,et al.  Contributions to the theory of atmospheric refraction , 1972 .

[16]  Wei Cao,et al.  RTX Positioning: The Next Generation of cm-accurate Real-time GNSS Positioning , 2011 .