Posted prices vs. negotiations: an asymptotic analysis

The design of optimal auctions focuses on ways to negotiate with the bidders for eliciting relevant information that they hold. Sometimes, however, decisions should be made very quickly, and the auctioneer cannot allow a costly iterative procedure of negotiation or waiting for bidders to determine their exact valuation. One solution that has been used in practice is to post prices for the bidders, without collecting any information from the bidders, and ask for their immediate take-it-or-leave-it response. Our paper compares the expected revenue in full-revelation auctions to that in posted-price auctions. We focus on single-item auctions in a Bayesian model where the values that the bidders are willing to pay for the item are independently identically distributed according to a known distribution. This paper provides an exact asymptotic characterization of the optimal expected revenue achieved by each one of the above auctions. For posted price auctions, we also present the exact prices that achieve the optimal results.Our results are given up to terms with lower asymptotic order, that is, up to factor of 1--o(1). We provide two sets of results; one for distributions on a support that is bounded from above, and a second set for distributions on unbounded supports. In the first case we require a mild assumption on the way the distribution function approaches the end of the support, called the first von Mises condition; the latter case requires a similar mild condition called the second von Mises condition. These very weak conditions are taken from works on extreme-value theory and highest-order statistics.

[1]  Craig Boutilier,et al.  A study of limited-precision, incremental elicitation in auctions , 2004, Proceedings of the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, 2004. AAMAS 2004..

[2]  Gadi Fibich,et al.  Asymptotic Analysis of Large Auctions , 2004 .

[3]  Steven R. Williams,et al.  The Rate of Convergence to Efficiency in the Buyer's Bid Double Auction as the Market Becomes Large , 1989 .

[4]  J. Geluk,et al.  Regular variation, extensions and Tauberian theorems , 1987 .

[5]  A. A. Balkema,et al.  On R. Von Mises' Condition for the Domain of Attraction of $\exp(-e^{-x})^1$ , 1971 .

[6]  William Vickrey,et al.  Counterspeculation, Auctions, And Competitive Sealed Tenders , 1961 .

[7]  W. Stadje On multiple stopping bales , 1985 .

[8]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[9]  Gadi Fibich,et al.  Large auctions with risk-averse bidders , 2010, Int. J. Game Theory.

[10]  E. Samuel-Cahn Comparison of Threshold Stop Rules and Maximum for Independent Nonnegative Random Variables , 1984 .

[11]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Automated Online Mechanism Design and Prophet Inequalities , 2007, AAAI.

[12]  Heidrun C. Hoppe,et al.  Coarse matching with incomplete information , 2008 .

[13]  Matthew O. Jackson,et al.  On the informational inefficiency of discriminatory price auctions , 2007, J. Econ. Theory.

[14]  T. Mikosch Regular variation, subexponentiality and their applications in probability theory , 1999 .

[15]  R. McAfee Coarse Matching , 2001 .

[16]  Silvia Caserta,et al.  Auctions with Numerous Bidders , 2005 .

[17]  E. Maasland,et al.  Auction Theory , 2021, Springer Texts in Business and Economics.

[18]  Mohammad Taghi Hajiaghayi,et al.  Adaptive limited-supply online auctions , 2004, EC '04.

[19]  Roger B. Myerson,et al.  Optimal Auction Design , 1981, Math. Oper. Res..

[20]  Steven A. Lippman,et al.  SELECTING A SELLING INSTITUTION: AUCTIONS VERSUS SEQUENTIAL SEARCH * , 1995 .

[21]  U. Balakrishnan,et al.  On the mean value of Dirichlet series , 1984 .

[22]  A. Gnedin A Solution to the Game of Googol , 1994 .

[23]  F. Mosteller,et al.  Recognizing the Maximum of a Sequence , 1966 .

[24]  Ruqu Wang Auctions versus Posted-Price Selling , 1993 .

[25]  Paul R. Milgrom,et al.  Auctions and Bidding: A Primer , 1989 .

[26]  Jeroen M. Swinkels Asymptotic Efficiency for Discriminatory Private Value Auctions , 1999 .

[27]  Jeremy I. Bulow,et al.  Auctions versus Negotiations , 1996 .

[28]  D. P. Kennedy Prophet-type inequalities for multi-choice optimal stopping , 1987 .

[29]  Paul Klemperer,et al.  Why Do Sellers (Usually) Prefer Auctions? , 2009 .

[30]  Klaus Kultti,et al.  Equivalence of Auctions and Posted Prices , 1999 .

[31]  Tuomas Sandholm,et al.  Sequences of take-it-or-leave-it offers: near-optimal auctions without full valuation revelation , 2003, AAMAS '06.

[32]  Nimrod Megiddo,et al.  Improved algorithms and analysis for secretary problems and generalizations , 1995, Proceedings of IEEE 36th Annual Foundations of Computer Science.

[33]  B. Gnedenko Sur La Distribution Limite Du Terme Maximum D'Une Serie Aleatoire , 1943 .

[34]  Robert D. Kleinberg A multiple-choice secretary algorithm with applications to online auctions , 2005, SODA '05.

[35]  Steven R. Williams,et al.  Convergence to Efficiency in a Simple Market with Incomplete Information , 1994 .

[36]  L. Haan,et al.  Extreme value theory : an introduction , 2006 .

[37]  Robert B. Wilson Efficient and Competitive Rationing , 1989 .

[38]  Steven R. Williams,et al.  The Optimality of a Simple Market Mechanism , 2002 .

[39]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Informational limitations of ascending combinatorial auctions , 2010, J. Econ. Theory.

[40]  Zvika Neeman The effectiveness of English auctions , 2003, Games Econ. Behav..

[41]  Noam Nisan,et al.  Auctions with Severely Bounded Communication , 2007, J. Artif. Intell. Res..