The European Policy for the Development of an Information Society: the Right Path?

The end of 2005 marked the closure of one stage in the European strategy for the promotion of the information society (the "e"Europe programme) and the start of the next one (i2010). This seems to be a good time for assessing the results achieved to date by the community policy in this area and analysing whether the correct approach has been adopted. Despite the satisfaction shown in certain official appraisals, the picture resulting from consulting different classifications globally measuring the adaptation of countries to the information society is not that optimistic. Only the European Union leaders in this field (the Nordic countries) have improved their positions, broadening the gap with the rest: western European countries have lost ground (or at least have not improved) in the rankings, the southern countries do not seem to have corrected their deficiencies and the indices for the new Member States have not evolved as expected or have even deteriorated in some cases. Even though becoming one of the most competitive and dynamic "knowledge-based" economies in the world was the first "Leitmotiv" of the Lisbon strategy, the interpretation of the documents connected to the definition of the new stage in the strategy led to doubts over whether the European Union has a clear notion on the course of action to take in order to make progress on the information society a matter of priority. Copyright (c) 2008 The Author(s). Journal compilation (c) 2008 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.

[1]  Michel J. Menou,et al.  A “Grand Challenge”: Measuring Information Societies , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[2]  Anders Henten,et al.  European planning for an information society , 1996 .

[3]  Kendra S. Albright,et al.  Global measures of development and the information society , 2005 .

[4]  J. Gómez-Barroso,et al.  Universal Service in a Broader Perspective: The European Digital Divide , 2009 .

[5]  Jacint Jordana Governing telecommunications and the new information society in Europe , 2002 .

[6]  Karine Barzilai-Nahon,et al.  Gaps and Bits: Conceptualizing Measurements for Digital Divide/s , 2006 .

[7]  José Luis Gómez Barroso,et al.  European competition law in the electronic communications sector: evolution and critical analysis , 2006, Ann. des Télécommunications.

[8]  Francesco Daveri,et al.  The New Economy in Europe (1992-2001) , 2002 .

[9]  Katharine Sarikakis,et al.  Pleonastic exclusion in the European Information Society , 2000, Telematics Informatics.

[10]  Vasja Vehovar,et al.  Methodological Challenges of Digital Divide Measurements , 2006, Inf. Soc..

[11]  Daniele Archibugi,et al.  Is Europe Becoming the Most Dynamic Knowledge Economy in the World? , 2005 .

[12]  José Luis Gómez Barroso,et al.  Public policies against the digital divide: a necessary adaptation to different degrees of development , 2006, Int. J. Internet Enterp. Manag..

[13]  Ari-Veikko Anttiroiko Toward the European information society , 2001, CACM.

[14]  Jean Claude Burgelman,et al.  In search of a European model for the Information Society , 2000, Telematics and informatics.