Complex interactions can create persistent fluctuations in high-diversity ecosystems

When can ecological interactions drive an entire ecosystem into a persistent non-equilibrium state, where many species populations fluctuate without going to extinction? We show that high-diversity spatially heterogeneous systems can exhibit chaotic dynamics which persist for extremely long times. We develop a theoretical framework, based on dynamical mean-field theory, to quantify the conditions under which these fluctuating states exist, and predict their properties. We uncover parallels with the persistence of externally-perturbed ecosystems, such as the role of perturbation strength, synchrony and correlation time. But uniquely to endogenous fluctuations, these properties arise from the species dynamics themselves, creating feedback loops between perturbation and response. A key result is that fluctuation amplitude and species diversity are tightly linked: in particular, fluctuations enable dramatically more species to coexist than at equilibrium in the very same system. Our findings highlight crucial differences between well-mixed and spatially-extended systems, with implications for experiments and their ability to reproduce natural dynamics. They shed light on the maintenance of biodiversity, and the strength and synchrony of fluctuations observed in natural systems.

[2]  M. Leibold,et al.  Stability and complexity in model meta-ecosystems , 2016, Nature Communications.

[3]  C. Harley,et al.  Community ecology in a warming world: The influence of temperature on interspecific interactions in marine systems , 2011 .

[4]  Guy Bunin,et al.  Generic assembly patterns in complex ecological communities , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[5]  ROBERT M. MAY,et al.  Will a Large Complex System be Stable? , 1972, Nature.

[6]  M. Mézard,et al.  The Bethe lattice spin glass revisited , 2000, cond-mat/0009418.

[7]  C. Graham,et al.  Towards a predictive model of species interaction beta diversity. , 2018, Ecology letters.

[8]  W. Schaffer,et al.  Chaos reduces species extinction by amplifying local population noise , 1993, Nature.

[9]  M. Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity as spatial insurance in heterogeneous landscapes , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[10]  Stefano Allesina,et al.  Feasibility and coexistence of large ecological communities , 2017, Nature Communications.

[11]  Opper,et al.  Phase transition and 1/f noise in a game dynamical model. , 1992, Physical review letters.

[12]  D. Kessler,et al.  Generalized model of island biodiversity. , 2014, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Per Lundberg,et al.  Noise colour and the risk of population extinctions , 1996, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[14]  E. Leigh,et al.  The average lifetime of a population in a varying environment. , 1981, Journal of theoretical biology.

[15]  Tobias Galla,et al.  Complex dynamics in learning complicated games , 2011, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[16]  E. Ranta,et al.  Population variability in space and time. , 2000, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[17]  Guy Bunin,et al.  Numerical implementation of dynamical mean field theory for disordered systems: application to the Lotka–Volterra model of ecosystems , 2019, Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical.

[18]  B. Meerson,et al.  How colored environmental noise affects population extinction. , 2008, Physical review letters.

[19]  J. Halley Ecology, evolution and 1 f -noise. , 1996, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[20]  D. S. Fisher,et al.  Stabilization of extensive fine-scale diversity by spatio-temporal chaos , 2019, bioRxiv.

[21]  O. Ovaskainen,et al.  Stochastic models of population extinction. , 2010, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[22]  N. Gray,et al.  Corrigendum: THZ1 targeting CDK7 suppresses STAT transcriptional activity and sensitizes T-cell lymphomas to BCL2 inhibitors , 2017, Nature Communications.

[23]  Marten Scheffer,et al.  Why plankton communities have no equilibrium: solutions to the paradox , 2004, Hydrobiologia.

[24]  Stephen P. Ellner,et al.  Chaos in a Noisy World: New Methods and Evidence from Time-Series Analysis , 1995, The American Naturalist.

[25]  G. B. Arous,et al.  Symmetric Langevin spin glass dynamics , 1997 .

[26]  Sommers,et al.  Chaos in random neural networks. , 1988, Physical review letters.

[27]  Justin D. Yeakel,et al.  Laplacian matrices and Turing bifurcations: revisiting Levin 1974 and the consequences of spatial structure and movement for ecological dynamics , 2019, Theoretical Ecology.

[28]  Tobias Galla,et al.  Random replicators with asymmetric couplings , 2005, cond-mat/0508174.

[29]  R. Lande Risks of Population Extinction from Demographic and Environmental Stochasticity and Random Catastrophes , 1993, The American Naturalist.

[30]  Kristian Trøjelsgaard,et al.  Beta Diversity of Plant-Pollinator Networks and the Spatial Turnover of Pairwise Interactions , 2014, PloS one.

[31]  A A Berryman,et al.  Are ecological systems chaotic - And if not, why not? , 1989, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[32]  M. Mézard,et al.  Spin Glass Theory And Beyond: An Introduction To The Replica Method And Its Applications , 1986 .

[33]  P. Inchausti,et al.  On the relation between temporal variability and persistence time in animal populations , 2003 .

[34]  R M May,et al.  Biological Populations with Nonoverlapping Generations: Stable Points, Stable Cycles, and Chaos , 1974, Science.

[35]  Michel Loreau,et al.  Biodiversity and ecosystem stability: a synthesis of underlying mechanisms. , 2013, Ecology letters.

[36]  Yuval R. Zelnik,et al.  The three regimes of spatial recovery , 2018, bioRxiv.

[37]  Nadejda A. Soudzilovskaia,et al.  Asynchrony among local communities stabilises ecosystem function of metacommunities , 2017, Ecology letters.