Individual differences versus social dynamics in the formation of animal dominance hierarchies

Linear hierarchies, the classical pecking-order structures, are formed readily in both nature and the laboratory in a great range of species including humans. However, the probability of getting linear structures by chance alone is quite low. In this paper we investigate the two hypotheses that are proposed most often to explain linear hierarchies: they are predetermined by differences in the attributes of animals, or they are produced by the dynamics of social interaction, i.e., they are self-organizing. We evaluate these hypotheses using cichlid fish as model animals, and although differences in attributes play a significant part, we find that social interaction is necessary for high proportions of groups with linear hierarchies. Our results suggest that dominance hierarchy formation is a much richer and more complex phenomenon than previously thought, and we explore the implications of these results for evolutionary biology, the social sciences, and the use of animal models in understanding human social organization.

[1]  R. Huber,et al.  The formation and maintenance of crayfish hierarchies: behavioral and self-structuring properties , 2000, Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology.

[2]  Charlotte K. Hemelrijk,et al.  Towards the integration of social dominance and spatial structure , 2000, Animal Behaviour.

[3]  Joan B. Silk,et al.  Male bonnet macaques use information about third-party rank relationships to recruit allies , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[4]  L. Freeman,et al.  Finding an appropriate order for a hierarchy based on probabilistic dominance , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[5]  L. L. Wolf,et al.  The winner and loser effect: integrating multiple experiences , 1999, Animal Behaviour.

[6]  J. Johnsson,et al.  Watch and learn: preview of the fighting ability of opponents alters contest behaviour in rainbow trout , 1998, Animal Behaviour.

[7]  Peter K. McGregor,et al.  Know thine enemy: fighting fish gather information from observing conspecific interactions , 1998, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences.

[8]  Á. Miklósi,et al.  Learning about the opponent during aggressive encounters in paradise fish (Macropodus opercularis L.): when it takes place? , 1997, Behavioural Processes.

[9]  J. Beaugrand,et al.  The role of individual differences and patterns of resolution in the formation of dominance orders in domestic hen triads , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[10]  J. Beaugrand,et al.  The role of individual differences in the formation of triadic dominance orders of male green swordtail fish (Xiphophorus helleri) , 1996, Behavioural Processes.

[11]  John Skvoretz,et al.  Social structure, networks, and E‐state structuralism models , 1996 .

[12]  I. Chase,et al.  Aggressive interactions and inter-contest interval: how long do winners keep winning?. , 1994, Animal Behaviour.

[13]  R. Sapolsky,et al.  Rank‐related differences in cardiovascular function among wild baboons: Role of sensitivity to glucocorticoids , 1994, American journal of primatology.

[14]  K. Holekamp,et al.  Ontogeny of dominance in free-living spotted hyaenas: juvenile rank relations with other immature individuals , 1993, Animal Behaviour.

[15]  C. Drews.  THE CONCEPT AND DEFINITION OF DOMINANCE IN ANIMAL BEHAVIOUR , 1993 .

[16]  W. Post.  Dominance and mating success in male boat-tailed grackles , 1992, Animal Behaviour.

[17]  Michael J. Raleigh,et al.  Serotonergic mechanisms promote dominance acquisition in adult male vervet monkeys , 1991, Brain Research.

[18]  R. C. Francis.  Socially mediated variation in growth rate of the midas cichlid: The primacy of early size differences , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[19]  W. Jackson,et al.  Linearity in dominance hierarchies: a second look at the individual attributes model , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[20]  J. Beacham.  The relative importance of body size and aggressive experience as determinants of dominance in pumpkinseed sunfish, Lepomis gibbosus , 1988, Animal Behaviour.

[21]  P. J. B. Slater,et al.  Individual differences and dominance hierarchies , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[22]  Jerram L. Brown,et al.  Social dominance in communal Mexican jays Aphelocoma ultramarina , 1986, Animal Behaviour.

[23]  Ivan D. Chase,et al.  The sequential analysis of aggressive acts during hierarchy formation: an application of the ‘jigsaw puzzle’ approach , 1985, Animal Behaviour.

[24]  M. Nelissen.  Structure of the Dominance Hierarchy and Dominance Determining "Group Factors" in Melanochromis Auratus (Pisces, Cichlidae) , 1985 .

[25]  M. Midgley.  Sociobiology. , 1984, Journal of medical ethics.

[26]  T. Clutton‐Brock,et al.  Maternal dominance, breeding success and birth sex ratios in red deer , 1984, Nature.

[27]  Patricia R. Barchas.  Social hierarchies : essays toward a sociophysiological perspective , 1984 .

[28]  R. C. Francis.  The Effects of Bidirectional Selection for Social Dominance On Agonistic Behavior and Sex Ratios in the Paradise Fish (Macropodus Opercularis) , 1984 .

[29]  Sally P. Mendoza,et al.  Behavioral processes leading to linear status hierarchies following group formation in rhesus monkeys , 1983 .

[30]  J. Altmann,et al.  Long-Term Consistency of Dominance Relations Among Female Baboons (Papio cynocephalus) , 1982, Science.

[31]  I. Chase,et al.  DYNAMICS OF HIERARCHY FORMATION: THE SEQUENTIAL DEVELOPMENT OF DOMINANCE RELATIONSHIPS , 1982 .

[32]  Samuel Leinhardt,et al.  Perspectives on social network research , 1980 .

[33]  ritch c. savin-williams.  Dominance hierarchies in groups of middle to late adolescent males , 1980, Journal of youth and adolescence.

[34]  K. Mellanby.  How Nature works , 1978, Nature.

[35]  Martin W. Schein,et al.  Social hierarchy and dominance , 1975 .

[36]  Ivan D. Chase,et al.  Models of hierarchy formation in animal societies , 1974 .

[37]  M. Lindauer.  Ethology. , 1962, Annual review of psychology.

[38]  H. Landau.  On dominance relations and the structure of animal societies: I. Effect of inherent characteristics , 1951 .