Determination of line profiles on photomasks using DUV, EUV, and x-ray scattering

Non-imaging techniques like X-ray scattering are supposed to play an important role in the further development of CD metrology for the semiconductor industry. GISAXS provides directly assessable information on structure roughness and long-range periodic perturbations. The disadvantage of the method is the large footprint of the X-ray beam on the sample due to the extremely shallow angle of incidence. This can be overcome by using wavelengths in the extreme ultraviolet (EUV) spectral range which allow for much steeper angles of incidence but preserve the large range of momentum transfer that can be observed. At the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB), the available photon energy range extends from 50 eV up to 10 keV at two adjacent beamlines. PTB commissioned a new versatile Ellipso-Scatterometer which is capable of measuring 6” square substrates in a clean, hydrocarbon-free environment with full flexibility regarding the direction of the incident light polarization. The reconstruction of line profiles using a geometrical model with six free parameters, a finite element method (FEM) Maxwell solver and least-squares optimization yielded consistent results for EUV and deep ultraviolet (DUV) scatterometry. For EUV photomasks, the actinic wavelength EUV scatterometry yields particular advantages. A significant polarization dependence of the diffraction intensities for 0th and +1st orders in the geometry with the grating lines perpendicular to the plane of reflection is observed and the 0th order intensity shows sufficient sensitivity to the line width such that a CD-resolution below 0.1 nm is within reach. In this contribution we present scatterometry data for line gratings using GISAXS, and EUV and DUV scatterometry and consistent reconstruction results of the line geometry for EUV and DUV scatterometry.

[1]  Lin Zschiedrich,et al.  Benchmark of FEM, waveguide, and FDTD algorithms for rigorous mask simulation , 2005, SPIE Photomask Technology.

[2]  Richard A. Allen,et al.  Traceable calibration of critical-dimension atomic force microscope linewidth measurements with nanometer uncertainty , 2005 .

[3]  Costas J. Spanos,et al.  Specular spectroscopic scatterometry in DUV lithography , 1999, Advanced Lithography.

[4]  J. McNeil,et al.  Multiparameter grating metrology using optical scatterometry , 1997 .

[5]  Frank Scholze,et al.  Synchrotron radiation-based x-ray reflection and scattering techniques for dimensional nanometrology , 2011 .

[6]  John R. McNeil,et al.  Metrology of subwavelength photoresist gratings using optical scatterometry , 1995 .

[7]  Frank Scholze,et al.  Effect of line roughness on the diffraction intensities in angular resolved scatterometry , 2010 .

[8]  Frank Scholze,et al.  A quarter‐century of metrology using synchrotron radiation by PTB in Berlin , 2009 .

[9]  P. Lalanne,et al.  Highly improved convergence of the coupled-wave method for TM polarization and conical mountings , 1996, Diffractive Optics and Micro-Optics.

[10]  Bernd Bodermann,et al.  Investigations of the influence of common approximations in scatterometry for dimensional nanometrology , 2014 .

[11]  Frank Scholze,et al.  High-accuracy EUV metrology of PTB using synchrotron radiation , 2001, SPIE Advanced Lithography.

[12]  Hans J. Tiziani,et al.  Rigorous coupled-wave analysis calculus of submicrometer interference pattern and resolving edge position versus signal-to-noise ratio , 2002 .

[13]  F. Scholze,et al.  The EUV metrology program of PTB , 2006 .

[14]  F. Ihlenburg Finite Element Analysis of Acoustic Scattering , 1998 .

[15]  Hermann Gross,et al.  First steps towards a scatterometry reference standard , 2012, Other Conferences.

[16]  Frank Scholze,et al.  Direct structural characterisation of line gratings with grazing incidence small-angle x-ray scattering. , 2012, The Review of scientific instruments.

[17]  Michael Krumrey,et al.  Characterization of an in-vacuum PILATUS 1M detector. , 2013, Journal of synchrotron radiation.

[18]  Johannes Elschner,et al.  Finite Element Solution of Conical Diffraction Problems , 2002, Adv. Comput. Math..

[19]  Frank Scholze,et al.  EUV and DUV scatterometry for CD and edge profile metrology on EUV masks , 2009, European Mask and Lithography Conference.

[20]  S. Burger,et al.  Rigorous simulations of 3D patterns on extreme ultraviolet lithography masks , 2011, Optical Metrology.

[21]  C. G. Frase,et al.  CD characterization of nanostructures in SEM metrology , 2007 .

[22]  Nickhil H. Jakatdar,et al.  Specular spectroscopic scatterometry , 2001 .

[23]  Jan Richter,et al.  Deep ultraviolet scatterometer for dimensional characterization of nanostructures: system improvements and test measurements , 2011 .

[24]  Hsu-ting Huang,et al.  Spectroscopic ellipsometry and reflectometry from gratings (Scatterometry) for critical dimension measurement and in situ, real-time process monitoring , 2004 .

[25]  Frank Scholze,et al.  Nanometrology on gratings with GISAXS: FEM reconstruction and fourier analysis , 2014, Advanced Lithography.