Ambient air levels and the exposure of children to benzene, toluene, and xylenes in Denmark.

The aims of the study were to evaluate if the front-door concentrations of benzene, toluene, and xylenes can be used to classify the personal exposures of Danish children and to identify factors that affect their personal exposure. Average concentrations were measured over 1 week with diffusive samplers, and the personal exposures of 98 children and the concentrations outside the front doors of their homes were measured simultaneously. Time and activity patterns were noted in diaries. The front-door concentrations were significantly higher in Copenhagen than in rural areas (all P < 0.0001), but the personal exposures were only slightly higher. Even though the personal exposures were highly significantly associated with front-door concentrations in urban areas (all P < 0.004), use of the residential front-door concentration as an exposure surrogate would imply misclassification, as it cannot be used for rural children. Multiple regression analyses brought to light several factors that affect the exposure of children independently, including front-door concentration, riding in cars, and activities involving potential exposure to gasoline vapors like motocross, moped driving, and refueling of cars.

[1]  E. Grandjean,et al.  Quantitative bestimmung verschiedener gasphasenkomponenten des nebenstromrauches von zigaretten in der raumluft als beitrag zum problem des passivrauchens , 1976 .

[2]  H Checkoway,et al.  Bias due to misclassification in the estimation of relative risk. , 1977, American journal of epidemiology.

[3]  Yukio Yanagisawa,et al.  A badge-type personal sampler for measurement of personal exposure to NO2 and NO in ambient air , 1982 .

[4]  C. S. Dudney,et al.  An indoor air quality study of 40 east Tennessee homes , 1986 .

[5]  C Brownie,et al.  The effects of exposure misclassification on estimates of relative risk. , 1986, American journal of epidemiology.

[6]  Lance Wallace,et al.  Personal exposures, indoor and outdoor air concentrations, and exhaled breath concentrations of selected volatile organic compounds measured for 600 residents of New Jersey, North Dakota, North Carolina and California† , 1986 .

[7]  C Sparacino,et al.  The TEAM (Total Exposure Assessment Methodology) Study: personal exposures to toxic substances in air, drinking water, and breath of 400 residents of New Jersey, North Carolina, and North Dakota. , 1987, Environmental research.

[8]  L. Wallace,et al.  Exposures to benzene and other volatile compounds from active and passive smoking. , 1987, Archives of environmental health.

[9]  L. Wallace,et al.  The California TEAM study: Breath concentrations and personal exposures to 26 volatile compounds in air and drinking water of 188 residents of Los Angeles, Antioch, and Pittsburg, CA , 1988 .

[10]  L. Wallace,et al.  Major sources of benzene exposure. , 1989, Environmental health perspectives.

[11]  L. Wallace.  Major Sources of Exposure to Benzene and Other Volatile Organic Chemicals1,2 , 1990 .

[12]  Douglas G. Altman,et al.  Practical statistics for medical research , 1990 .

[13]  D. Westerdahl,et al.  The Los Angeles TEAM Study: personal exposures, indoor-outdoor air concentrations, and breath concentrations of 25 volatile organic compounds. , 1991, Journal of exposure analysis and environmental epidemiology.

[14]  Donald D. Rosebrook,et al.  Total exposure assessment methodology (team) study: Personal exposures, indoor-outdoor relationships, and breath levels of volatile organic compounds in New Jersey , 1993 .

[15]  Benzol und Toluol in Kinderzimmern , 1994 .