Are mobile in-car communication systems feasible?: a usability study

The issue of driver distraction remains critical despite efforts that aim to reduce its effects. In-Car Communication Systems (ICCS) were introduced to address visual and manual distraction occurring when using a mobile phone whilst driving. ICCS running on mobile phone have increased the number of people using ICCS as they can be installed at no cost and the quality of speech recognition on mobile devices is improving. Little research, however, has been conducted to investigate usability problems with mobile ICCS. This paper proposes a new model to address some of the issues found with current mobile ICCS, called the multimodal interface for mobile info-communication with context (MIMIC). This paper discusses the design and usability evaluation of a prototype mobile ICCS, designed using MIMIC. Several tasks were evaluated using different metrics including time on task, task completion, task success, number of errors, flexibility, user satisfaction and workload. Results obtained show that the users gave a good overall rating to the mobile ICCS, which indicates that users will easily accept such technology. Future work will include redesigning the speech user interface in order to address the usability issues found with the current prototype.

[1]  Katja Kircher,et al.  Driver distraction : a review of the literature , 2007 .

[2]  Stefan Mattes,et al.  Surrogate Distraction Measurement Techniques: The Lane Change Test , 2009 .

[3]  Matthias Peissner,et al.  Can voice interaction help reducing the level of distraction and prevent accidents? , 2011 .

[4]  Richard J. Hanowski,et al.  Driver Distraction in Commercial Vehicle Operations , 2009 .

[5]  Rebecca A. Grier,et al.  The System Usability Scale , 2013 .

[6]  Louis Tijerina,et al.  Driver Workload Effects of Cell Phone, Music Player, and Text Messaging Tasks with the Ford SYNC Voice Interface versus Handheld Visual-Manual Interfaces , 2009 .

[7]  Cherian Varghese,et al.  An Examination of Driver Distraction as Recorded in NHTSA Databases , 2009 .

[8]  Trung Bui,et al.  Multimodal Dialogue Management - State of the art , 2006 .

[9]  Shih-Hao Hung,et al.  CSR: A Cloud-Assisted Speech Recognition Service for Personal Mobile Device , 2011, 2011 International Conference on Parallel Processing.

[10]  S. Hart,et al.  Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of Empirical and Theoretical Research , 1988 .

[11]  Bernhard Suhm,et al.  Towards best practices for speech user interface design , 2003, INTERSPEECH.

[12]  Jakob Nielsen,et al.  A mathematical model of the finding of usability problems , 1993, INTERCHI.

[13]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  The effects of text messaging on young novice driver performance , 2005 .

[14]  Junlan Feng,et al.  Speech and language processing over the web , 2008, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[15]  Matthias Peissner,et al.  Voice User Interface Design , 2004, UP.

[16]  Michael A. Regan,et al.  Driver distraction: A review of the literature , 2003 .

[17]  M. Just,et al.  A decrease in brain activation associated with driving when listening to someone speak , 2008, Brain Research.

[18]  Amanda Lenhart,et al.  Teens and Distracted Driving: Texting, Talking and Other Uses of theCell Phone Behind the Wheel , 2009 .

[19]  A. F. Khalifeh,et al.  Mobile-free driving with Android phones: System design and performance evaluation , 2012, International Multi-Conference on Systems, Sygnals & Devices.

[20]  Frank Drews,et al.  A Comparison of the Cell Phone Driver and the Drunk Driver , 2004, Hum. Factors.