Number without a language model

Cross-cultural studies suggest that access to a conventional language containing words that can be used for counting is essential to develop representations of large exact numbers. However, cultures that lack a conventional counting system typically differ from cultures that have such systems, not only in language but also in many other ways. As a result, it is difficult to isolate the effects of language on the development of number representations. Here we examine the numerical abilities of individuals who lack conventional language for number (deaf individuals who do not have access to a usable model for language, spoken or signed) but who live in a numerate culture (Nicaragua) and thus have access to other aspects of culture that might foster the development of number. These deaf individuals develop their own gestures, called homesigns, to communicate. We show that homesigners use gestures to communicate about number. However, they do not consistently extend the correct number of fingers when communicating about sets greater than three, nor do they always correctly match the number of items in one set to a target set when that target set is greater than three. Thus, even when integrated into a numerate society, individuals who lack input from a conventional language do not spontaneously develop representations of large exact numerosities.

[1]  P. Gordon Numerical Cognition Without Words: Evidence from Amazonia , 2004, Science.

[2]  Ken Hale Gaps in grammar and culture , 1975 .

[3]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Spontaneous sign systems created by deaf children in two cultures , 1998, Nature.

[4]  C R Gallistel,et al.  Language and the Origin of Numerical Concepts , 2004, Science.

[5]  S Goldin-Meadow,et al.  The development of language-like communication without a language model. , 1977, Science.

[6]  Rochel Gelman,et al.  Language and Conceptual Development series Number and language : how are they related ? , 2004 .

[7]  Robert S. Lockhart,et al.  Learning and Motivation , 1981 .

[8]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Number as a cognitive technology: Evidence from Pirahã language and cognition , 2008, Cognition.

[9]  Oswald Werner,et al.  Linguistics and anthropology : in honor of C.F. Voegelin , 1977 .

[10]  S. Goldin-Meadow,et al.  Gestural communication in deaf children: noneffect of parental input on language development. , 1983, Science.

[11]  S. Carey,et al.  Re-visiting the competence/performance debate in the acquisition of the counting principles , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[12]  Katherine D. Kinzler,et al.  Core knowledge. , 2007, Developmental science.

[13]  Elizabeth S. Spelke,et al.  Preschool children master the logic of number word meanings , 2006, Cognition.

[14]  S. Carey The Origin of Concepts , 2000 .

[15]  Susan Goldin-Meadow,et al.  The Resilience of Language , 2005 .

[16]  Marie Coppola,et al.  Grammatical Subjects in home sign: Abstract linguistic structure in adult primary gesture systems without linguistic input. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  S. Dehaene,et al.  Exact and Approximate Arithmetic in an Amazonian Indigene Group , 2004, Science.

[18]  James R. Hurford,et al.  Language and Number: The Emergence of a Cognitive System , 1987 .