Dissociable Effects of Motivation and Expectancy on Conflict Processing: An fMRI Study

Previous studies suggest that both motivation and task difficulty expectations activate brain regions associated with cognitive control. However, it remains an open question whether motivational and cognitive determinants of control have similar or dissociable impacts on conflict processing on a neural level. The current study tested the effects of motivation and conflict expectancy on activity in regions related to processing of the target and the distractor information. Participants performed a picture–word interference task in which we manipulated the size of performance-dependent monetary rewards (level of motivation) and the ratio of congruent to incongruent trials within a block (level of conflict expectancy). Our results suggest that motivation improves conflict processing by facilitating task-relevant stimulus processing and task difficulty expectations mainly modulate the processing of distractor information. We conclude that motivation and conflict expectancy engage dissociable control strategies during conflict resolution.

[1]  Sung-il Kim Neuroscientific Model of Motivational Process , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[2]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[3]  L. Jacoby,et al.  Multiple levels of control in the Stroop task , 2008, Memory & cognition.

[4]  Cameron S. Carter,et al.  Proactive and reactive control during emotional interference and its relationship to trait anxiety , 2012, Brain Research.

[5]  Luiz Pessoa,et al.  Reward Reduces Conflict by Enhancing Attentional Control and Biasing Visual Cortical Processing , 2011, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[6]  Andreas Olsson,et al.  In Your Face: Risk of Punishment Enhances Cognitive Control and Error-Related Activity in the Corrugator Supercilii Muscle , 2013, PloS one.

[7]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Domain-specific control mechanisms for emotional and nonemotional conflict processing , 2013, Cognition.

[8]  T. Egner,et al.  The Neural Underpinnings of How Reward Associations Can Both Guide and Misguide Attention , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[9]  T. Egner,et al.  Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information , 2005, Nature Neuroscience.

[10]  O. Hikosaka,et al.  Influence of reward expectation on visuospatial processing in macaque lateral prefrontal cortex. , 2002, Journal of neurophysiology.

[11]  L. Jiménez,et al.  It is not what you expect: dissociating conflict adaptation from expectancies in a Stroop task. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[12]  Kimberly L. Ray,et al.  Meta-analytic evidence for a superordinate cognitive control network subserving diverse executive functions , 2012, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[13]  Mark D'Esposito,et al.  Variation of BOLD hemodynamic responses across subjects and brain regions and their effects on statistical analyses , 2004, NeuroImage.

[14]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Neural mechanisms of concurrent stimulus processing in dual tasks , 2009, NeuroImage.

[15]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Sustained vs. transient cognitive control: Evidence of a behavioral dissociation , 2010, Cognition.

[16]  R. Engle,et al.  Working-memory capacity and the control of attention: the contributions of goal neglect, response competition, and task set to Stroop interference. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[17]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Distinct brain networks for adaptive and stable task control in humans , 2007, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[18]  C. N. Boehler,et al.  Task-Load-Dependent Activation of Dopaminergic Midbrain Areas in the Absence of Reward , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[19]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Anterior Cingulate Conflict Monitoring and Adjustments in Control , 2004, Science.

[20]  Joshua W. Brown,et al.  Medial prefrontal cortex as an action-outcome predictor , 2011, Nature Neuroscience.

[21]  C. Carver,et al.  Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales , 1994 .

[22]  Hannah S. Locke,et al.  Prefrontal cortex mediation of cognitive enhancement in rewarding motivational contexts , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  E. Miller,et al.  Neuronal activity in primate dorsolateral and orbital prefrontal cortex during performance of a reward preference task , 2003, The European journal of neuroscience.

[24]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Parsing executive processes: strategic vs. evaluative functions of the anterior cingulate cortex. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[25]  T. Schubert,et al.  Motivational and cognitive determinants of control during conflict processing , 2014, Cognition & emotion.

[26]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Dissociable Networks Control Conflict during Perception and Response Selection: A Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Study , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[27]  M. Botvinick Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function , 2007, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[28]  Jeffrey N Rouder,et al.  Exploring the differences in distributional properties between Stroop and Simon effects using delta plots , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[29]  Stefan Debener,et al.  Eine deutschsprachige Version des BIS/BAS-Fragebogens von Carver und White , 2001 .

[30]  E. Koechlin,et al.  Motivation and cognitive control in the human prefrontal cortex , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[31]  Heather A. Wilk,et al.  Brain regions associated with moment-to-moment adjustments in control and stable task-set maintenance , 2012, NeuroImage.

[32]  S. Dehaene,et al.  The visual word form area: a prelexical representation of visual words in the fusiform gyrus , 2002, Neuroreport.

[33]  A. Song,et al.  The involvement of the dopaminergic midbrain and cortico-striatal-thalamic circuits in the integration of reward prospect and attentional task demands. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[34]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Improved Assessment of Significant Activation in Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI): Use of a Cluster‐Size Threshold , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[35]  Edward E. Smith,et al.  Attention Enhances the Neural Processing of Relevant Features and Suppresses the Processing of Irrelevant Features in Humans: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study of the Stroop Task , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[36]  M. Botvinick,et al.  Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. , 2001, Psychological review.

[37]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Combined Effects of Attention and Motivation on Visual Task Performance: Transient and Sustained Motivational Effects , 2008, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[38]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Behavioral / Systems / Cognitive Function and Structure of the Right Inferior Frontal Cortex Predict Individual Differences in Response Inhibition : A Model-Based Approach , 2008 .

[39]  K. R. Ridderinkhof,et al.  Functional Connectivity of the Striatum Links Motivation to Action Control in Humans , 2011, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  Natalie C. Ebner,et al.  FACES—A database of facial expressions in young, middle-aged, and older women and men: Development and validation , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[41]  L. Pessoa,et al.  Embedding Reward Signals into Perception and Cognition , 2010, Front. Neurosci..

[42]  H. Aarts,et al.  Cueing task goals and earning money: Relatively high monetary rewards reduce failures to act on goals in a Stroop task , 2010, Motivation and emotion.

[43]  Ethan R. Buch,et al.  Cortical and subcortical interactions during action reprogramming and their related white matter pathways , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[44]  Wim Notebaert,et al.  Conflict adaptation: It is not what you expect , 2012, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[45]  E. Miller,et al.  An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. , 2001, Annual review of neuroscience.

[46]  R. Cools,et al.  Striatal Dopamine and the Interface between Motivation and Cognition , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[47]  T. Braver The variable nature of cognitive control: a dual mechanisms framework , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[48]  Richard Ridderinkhof Micro- and macro-adjustments of task set: activation and suppression in conflict tasks , 2002, Psychological research.

[49]  Torsten Schubert,et al.  Interference control in adult ADHD: no evidence for interference control deficits if response speed is controlled by delta plots. , 2013, Acta psychologica.

[50]  Yu Sun Chung,et al.  Anhedonia is associated with reduced incentive cue related activation in the basal ganglia , 2015, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[51]  W. K. Simmons,et al.  Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[52]  J. O'Doherty,et al.  Contributions of the striatum to learning, motivation, and performance: an associative account , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[53]  John C Gore,et al.  An event-related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[54]  G L Shulman,et al.  INAUGURAL ARTICLE by a Recently Elected Academy Member:A default mode of brain function , 2001 .

[55]  Hermann J. Müller,et al.  The neural implementation of task rule activation in the task-cuing paradigm: An event-related fMRI study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[56]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  The Expected Value of Control: An Integrative Theory of Anterior Cingulate Cortex Function , 2013, Neuron.

[57]  Clay B. Holroyd,et al.  Motivation of extended behaviors by anterior cingulate cortex , 2012, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[58]  Matthew J. C. Crump,et al.  In Support of a Distinction between Voluntary and Stimulus-Driven Control: A Review of the Literature on Proportion Congruent Effects , 2012, Front. Psychology.