Building a Regionally Connected Reserve Network in a Changing and Uncertain World

Abstract:  Habitat connectivity is required at large spatial scales to facilitate movement of biota in response to climatic changes and to maintain viable populations of wide‐ranging species. Nevertheless, it may require decades to acquire habitat linkages at such scales, and areas that could provide linkages are often developed before they can be reserved. Reserve scheduling methods usually consider only current threats, but threats change over time as development spreads and reaches presently secure areas. We investigated the importance of considering future threats when implementing projects to maintain habitat connectivity at a regional scale. To do so, we compared forward‐looking scheduling strategies with strategies that consider only current threats. The strategies were applied to a Costa Rican case study, where many reserves face imminent isolation and other reserves will probably become isolated in the more distant future. We evaluated strategies in terms of two landscape‐scale connectivity metrics, a pure connectivity metric and a metric of connected habitat diversity. Those strategies that considered only current threats were unreliable because they often failed to complete planned habitat linkage projects. The most reliable and effective strategies considered the future spread of development and its impact on the likelihood of completing planned habitat linkage projects. Our analyses highlight the critical need to consider future threats when building connected reserve networks over time.

[1]  J. Terborgh,et al.  Conserving nature at regional and continental scales—a scientific program for North America , 1999 .

[2]  Richard J. Hobbs,et al.  Triage: How do we prioritize health care for landscapes? , 2003 .

[3]  Robert L Pressey,et al.  Measuring and Incorporating Vulnerability into Conservation Planning , 2005, Environmental management.

[4]  I. R. Johnson,et al.  Shades of irreplaceability: towards a measure of the contribution of sites to a reservation goal , 1994, Biodiversity & Conservation.

[5]  M. Finley-Brook,et al.  Green Neoliberal Space: The Mesoamerican Biological Corridor , 2007 .

[6]  Ian Mansergh,et al.  Enhanced greenhouse climate change and its potential effect on selected fauna of south-eastern Australia: A trend analysis , 1995 .

[7]  Edsger W. Dijkstra,et al.  A note on two problems in connexion with graphs , 1959, Numerische Mathematik.

[8]  Daniel P. Faith,et al.  Practical application of biodiversity surrogates and percentage targets for conservation in Papua New Guinea , 2000 .

[9]  Aldina M. A. Franco,et al.  Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[10]  Richard M Cowling,et al.  Conservation planning in a changing world. , 2007, Trends in ecology & evolution.

[11]  Régis Sabbadin,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection under contagion risk of deforestation , 2007 .

[12]  S. Polasky,et al.  Dynamic reserve site selection , 2004 .

[13]  G. Sánchez‐Azofeifa,et al.  Deforestation pressure and biological reserve planning: a conceptual approach and an illustrative application for Costa Rica , 2004 .

[14]  Matthew E. Watts,et al.  Is maximizing protection the same as minimizing loss? Efficiency and retention as alternative measures of the effectiveness of proposed reserves , 2004 .

[15]  Michael Bevers,et al.  Direct spatial optimization in natural resource management: Four linear programming examples , 2000, Ann. Oper. Res..

[16]  Gretchen C. Daily,et al.  Integrity and isolation of Costa Rica's national parks and biological reserves: examining the dynamics of land-cover change , 2003 .

[17]  S. Saura,et al.  Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation , 2006, Landscape Ecology.

[18]  Atte Moilanen,et al.  Accounting for habitat loss rates in sequential reserve selection : Simple methods for large problems , 2007 .

[19]  Paul F. Harrison,et al.  Dynamic reserve design with the union-find algorithm , 2008 .

[20]  Charles C. Chester Responding to the Idea of Transboundary Conservation , 2003 .

[21]  R. Mittermeier,et al.  Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities , 2000, Nature.

[22]  Bette A. Loiselle,et al.  DIVERSITY OF BIRDS ALONG AN ELEVATIONAL GRADIENT IN THE CORDILLERA CENTRAL, COSTA RICA , 2000 .