Vedolizumab as Induction and Maintenance Therapy for Crohn's Disease in Patients Naïve to or Who Have Failed Tumor Necrosis Factor Antagonist Therapy

Background: Vedolizumab is a gut-selective &agr;4&bgr;7 integrin antagonist for the treatment of moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD). Aims of this study were to characterize the efficacy and safety of vedolizumab induction and maintenance therapy in patients who were naïve to tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-&agr;) antagonist therapy (TNF-naïve) or who had discontinued TNF-&agr; antagonist therapy because of inadequate response (i.e., primary nonresponse), loss of response, or intolerance (collectively classified as the TNF-failure population). Methods: Post hoc analyses of the efficacy data for 516 TNF-naïve and 960 TNF-failure patients from the GEMINI 2 and GEMINI 3 trials were evaluated at weeks 6, 10, and 52 and included clinical remission (CD Activity Index [CDAI] score ⩽150), enhanced clinical response (≥100-point decrease from baseline in CDAI score), durable clinical remission (remission at ≥80% of visits), and corticosteroid-free remission. Adverse events were summarized for the TNF-naïve and TNF-failure subgroups by treatment received. Results: Among patients who responded to vedolizumab induction at week 6, 48.9% of TNF-naïve and 27.7% of TNF-failure patients were in remission with vedolizumab at week 52 (versus 26.8% and 12.8% with placebo). Clinical efficacy was similar between the different types of TNF-&agr; antagonist failure or the number of prior TNF-&agr; antagonists failed. Safety profiles were similar in both subpopulations. Conclusions: Vedolizumab had increased efficacy over placebo in CD patients irrespective of TNF-&agr; antagonist treatment history. Overall, rates of response and remission were numerically higher in patients receiving vedolizumab as a first biologic than in patients who had experienced TNF failure.

[1]  P. Rutgeerts,et al.  Effects of vedolizumab induction therapy for patients with Crohn's disease in whom tumor necrosis factor antagonist treatment failed. , 2014, Gastroenterology.

[2]  D. Rubin,et al.  Real‐world assessment of therapy changes, suboptimal treatment and associated costs in patients with ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease , 2014, Alimentary pharmacology & therapeutics.

[3]  I. Ordás,et al.  Identification of inflammatory mediators in patients with Crohn's disease unresponsive to anti-TNFα therapy , 2014, Gut.

[4]  R. Cross,et al.  Adverse events in IBD: to stop or continue immune suppressant and biologic treatment , 2014, Expert review of gastroenterology & hepatology.

[5]  J. Berger,et al.  Vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody to the gut homing α4β7 integrin, does not affect cerebrospinal fluid T-lymphocyte immunophenotype , 2013, Journal of Neuroimmunology.

[6]  Kristin Stephens,et al.  Vedolizumab as induction and maintenance therapy for Crohn's disease. , 2013, The New England journal of medicine.

[7]  B. '. ’t Hart,et al.  Antagonizing the α4β1 Integrin, but Not α4β7, Inhibits Leukocytic Infiltration of the Central Nervous System in Rhesus Monkey Experimental Autoimmune Encephalomyelitis , 2013, The Journal of Immunology.

[8]  W. Sandborn,et al.  Crohn's disease , 2012, The Lancet.

[9]  K. Burke,et al.  Exclusive antagonism of the &agr;4&bgr;7 integrin by vedolizumab confirms the gut‐selectivity of this pathway in primates , 2012, Inflammatory bowel diseases.

[10]  G. Van Assche,et al.  Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Biologics for Inflammatory Bowel Disease , 2012, Inflammatory bowel diseases.

[11]  C. O'Morain,et al.  The second European evidence-based Consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn's disease: Current management. , 2010, Journal of Crohn's & colitis.

[12]  R. Panaccione,et al.  Review: Optimal use of biologics in the management of Crohn’s disease , 2010, Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology.

[13]  R. Egan,et al.  The Binding Specificity and Selective Antagonism of Vedolizumab, an Anti-α4β7 Integrin Therapeutic Antibody in Development for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases , 2009, Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

[14]  G. Hommel,et al.  Confidence interval or p-value?: part 4 of a series on evaluation of scientific publications. , 2009, Deutsches Arzteblatt international.

[15]  W. Sandborn Current directions in IBD therapy: what goals are feasible with biological modifiers? , 2008, Gastroenterology.

[16]  S. Hanauer,et al.  Adalimumab Induction Therapy for Crohn Disease Previously Treated with Infliximab , 2007, Annals of Internal Medicine.

[17]  Paul Rutgeerts,et al.  Infliximab for induction and maintenance therapy for ulcerative colitis. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[18]  S. Hanauer,et al.  For Personal Use. Only Reproduce with Permission from the Lancet Publishing Group , 2022 .

[19]  S. Hanauer,et al.  Management of Crohn's Disease in Adults , 2001, The American Journal of Gastroenterology.

[20]  E. Brown,et al.  The Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) , 1999, Drug safety.

[21]  C. Mackay,et al.  Rapid resolution of chronic colitis in the cotton-top tamarin with an antibody to a gut-homing integrin alpha 4 beta 7. , 1996, Gastroenterology.

[22]  M. Skup,et al.  Adalimumab therapy is associated with reduced risk of hospitalization in patients with ulcerative colitis. , 2014, Gastroenterology.

[23]  W. Sandborn Clinical perspectives in Crohn's disease. Moving forward with anti-TNF-alpha therapy: current needs and future treatments. , 2007, Reviews in gastroenterological disorders.

[24]  P. Rutgeerts,et al.  Adalimumab for maintenance of clinical response and remission in patients with Crohn's disease: the CHARM trial. , 2007, Gastroenterology.