A Combined Wormlike-Chain and Bead Model for Dynamic Simulations of Long Linear DNA

A carefully parameterized and tested simulation procedure for studying the dynamic properties of long linear DNA, based on a representation that combines features of both wormlike-chain and bead models, is presented. Our goals are to verify the model parameters and protocols with respect to all relevant experimental data and equilibrium simulations, to choose the most efficient algorithms, and to test different approximations that increase the speed of the computations. The energy of the linear model chain includes stretching, bending, and electrostatic components. Beads are associated with each vertex of the chain in order to specify the hydrodynamic properties of the DNA. The value of the stretching rigidity constant is chosen to achieve a compromise between the efficiency of the dynamic simulations (since the timestep depends on the stretching constant) and realistic modeling of the DNA (i.e., small deviations of the input contour length); the bead hydrodynamic radius is set to yield agreement with known values of the translational diffusion coefficient. By comparing results from both a first- and a second-order Brownian dynamics algorithm, we find that the two schemes give reasonable accuracy for integration timesteps in the range 200Â?500 ps. However, the greater accuracy of the second-order algorithm permits timesteps of 600 ps to be used for better accuracy than the 300 ps used in the first-order method. We develop a more efficient second-order algorithm for our model by eliminating the auxiliary calculations of the translational diffusion tensor at each timestep. This treatment does not sacrifice accuracy and reduces the required CPU time by about 50%. We also show that an appropriate monitoring of the chain topology ensures essentially no intrachain crossing. The model details are assessed by comparing simulation-generated equilibrium and dynamic properties with results of Monte Carlo simulations for short linear DNA (300, 600 base pairs) and with experimental results. Very good agreement is obtained with Monte Carlo results for distributions of the end-to-end distance, bond lengths, bond angles between adjacent links, and translational diffusion measurements. Additionally, comparison of translational diffusion coefficients with experimentally-measured values for DNA chains (of 367, 762, 1010, 2311 base pairs) shows excellent agreement as well. This lends confidence to the predictive ability of our model and sets the groundwork for further work on circular DNA. We conclude with results of such a predictive measurement, the autocorrelation time, for the end-to-end distance and the bending angle as a function of DNA length. Rotational diffusion measurements for different DNA lengths (300 to 2311 base pairs) are also presented.

[1]  V. Anshelevich,et al.  Torsional and bending rigidity of the double helix from data on small DNA rings. , 1985, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[2]  J. Schellman,et al.  Flexibility of DNA , 1974, Biopolymers.

[3]  Giuseppe Chirico,et al.  Calculating hydrodynamic properties of DNA through a second-order Brownian dynamics algorithm , 1991 .

[4]  Tamar Schlick,et al.  Trefoil Knotting Revealed by Molecular Dynamics Simulations of Supercoiled DNA , 1992, Science.

[5]  W. Olson,et al.  Simulating DNA at low resolution. , 1996, Current opinion in structural biology.

[6]  D. Stigter,et al.  Interactions of highly charged colloidal cylinders with applications to double‐stranded DNA , 1977 .

[7]  S. Harvey,et al.  Molecular mechanics model of supercoiled DNA. , 1989, Journal of molecular biology.

[8]  S. Prager,et al.  Variational Treatment of Hydrodynamic Interaction in Polymers , 1969 .

[9]  T Schlick,et al.  Modeling superhelical DNA: recent analytical and dynamic approaches. , 1995, Current opinion in structural biology.

[10]  N. Cozzarelli,et al.  Modeling of long‐range electrostatic interactions in DNA , 1995, Biopolymers.

[11]  Patrick J. Heath,et al.  Comparison of Analytical Theory with Brownian Dynamics Simulations for Small Linear and Circular DNAs , 1996 .

[12]  Bruno H. Zimm,et al.  Chain Molecule Hydrodynamics by the Monte-Carlo Method and the Validity of the Kirkwood-Riseman Approximation , 1980 .

[13]  J. García de la Torre,et al.  A second‐order algorithm for the simulation of the Brownian dynamics of macromolecular models , 1990 .

[14]  R. Pecora,et al.  DNA: a model compound for solution studies of macromolecules , 1991, Science.

[15]  J. Banavar,et al.  Computer Simulation of Liquids , 1988 .

[16]  N. Metropolis,et al.  Equation of State Calculations by Fast Computing Machines , 1953, Resonance.

[17]  J. Langowski,et al.  Brownian dynamics simulations of supercoiled DNA with bent sequences. , 1996, Biophysical journal.

[18]  N R Cozzarelli,et al.  Conformational and thermodynamic properties of supercoiled DNA. , 1994, Annual review of biophysics and biomolecular structure.

[19]  C. Brooks Computer simulation of liquids , 1989 .

[20]  B. Zimm,et al.  Monte Carlo approach to the analysis of the rotational diffusion of wormlike chains , 1981 .

[21]  V. Bloomfield,et al.  Hydrodynamic properties of macromolecular complexes. I. Translation , 1977 .

[22]  R. Pecora,et al.  Brownian dynamics simulations of wormlike chains: dynamic light scattering from a 2311 base pair DNA fragment , 1990 .

[23]  P. Hagerman Flexibility of DNA. , 1988, Annual review of biophysics and biophysical chemistry.

[24]  Ramachandran,et al.  Solvent effects on supercoiled DNA dynamics explored by Langevin dynamics simulations. , 1995, Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics.

[25]  K. V. van Holde,et al.  Sedimentation of homogeneous double-strand DNA molecules. , 1977, Biochemistry.

[26]  Robert H. Austin,et al.  Bending and twisting dynamics of short linear DNAs. Analysis of the triplet anisotropy decay of a 209 base pair fragment by Brownian simulation , 1989 .

[27]  Giuseppe Chirico,et al.  Kinetics of DNA supercoiling studied by Brownian dynamics simulation , 1994 .

[28]  T Schlick,et al.  The influence of salt on the structure and energetics of supercoiled DNA. , 1994, Biophysical journal.

[29]  C. Tanford Macromolecules , 1994, Nature.

[30]  K. Klenin,et al.  Computer simulation of DNA supercoiling. , 1991, Journal of molecular biology.

[31]  N R Cozzarelli,et al.  Probability of DNA knotting and the effective diameter of the DNA double helix. , 1993, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[32]  T Schlick,et al.  Internal motion of supercoiled DNA: brownian dynamics simulations of site juxtaposition. , 1998, Journal of molecular biology.

[33]  M. Volkenstein,et al.  Statistical mechanics of chain molecules , 1969 .

[34]  J. Wang,et al.  Knotting of a DNA chain during ring closure. , 1993, Science.

[35]  Stuart A. Allison,et al.  Brownian dynamics simulation of wormlike chains. Fluorescence depolarization and depolarized light scattering , 1986 .

[36]  P. Gennes Scaling Concepts in Polymer Physics , 1979 .

[37]  D. Ermak,et al.  Brownian dynamics with hydrodynamic interactions , 1978 .

[38]  J A McCammon,et al.  Multistep brownian dynamics: Application to short wormlike chains , 1984, Biopolymers.

[39]  T Schlick,et al.  Supercoiled DNA energetics and dynamics by computer simulation. , 1992, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  Alexander Vologodskii,et al.  REVIEWS OF TOPICAL PROBLEMS: Topological aspects of the physics of polymers: The theory and its biophysical applications , 1981 .