The active phase of labor.

The active phase of labor begins at various degrees of dilatation when the rate of dilatation transitions from the relatively flat slope of the latent phase to a more rapid slope. No diagnostic manifestations demarcate its onset, other than accelerating dilatation. It ends with apparent slowing of dilatation, a deceleration phase, which is usually short in duration and frequently undetected. Several aberrant labor patterns can be detected during the active phase, including protracted dilatation, arrest of dilatation, prolonged deceleration phase and failure of descent. Underlying factors may include cephalopelvic disproportion, excessive neuraxial block, poor uterine contractility, fetal malpositions, malpresentations, uterine infection, maternal obesity, advanced maternal age and previous cesarean delivery. When an active-phase disorder is identified, cesarean delivery is justifiable if there is compelling clinical evidence of disproportion. A prolonged deceleration disorder is strongly associated with disproportion and second stage abnormalities. Shoulder dystocia may occur if vaginal delivery eventuates. This review discusses several issues raised by the introduction of new clinical practice guidelines for labor management.

[1]  K. Mrklas,et al.  The REDUCED trial: a cluster randomized trial for REDucing the utilization of CEsarean delivery for dystocia. , 2023, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[2]  W. Cohen,et al.  The latent phase of labor. , 2023, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[3]  Michelle Osterman J. K. Changes in primary and repeat cesarean delivery: United States 2016-2021 , 2022 .

[4]  J. Stephenson Rate of First-time Cesarean Deliveries on the Rise in the US. , 2022, JAMA Health Forum.

[5]  Shen-Chih Chang,et al.  Hospital Quality Improvement Interventions, Statewide Policy Initiatives, and Rates of Cesarean Delivery for Nulliparous, Term, Singleton, Vertex Births in California. , 2021, JAMA.

[6]  K. McGeechan,et al.  Impact of analysis technique on our understanding of the natural history of labour: a simulation study , 2021, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[7]  T. Lavender,et al.  WHO next‐generation partograph: revolutionary steps towards individualised labour care , 2021, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[8]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Guidelines for Labor Assessment: Failure to Progress? , 2020, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[9]  K. Gregory,et al.  Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity After 4 and 6 Hours of Protracted Active Labor in Nulliparous Term Pregnancies. , 2019, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Obstetric practice guidelines: labor’s love lost? , 2019, The journal of maternal-fetal & neonatal medicine : the official journal of the European Association of Perinatal Medicine, the Federation of Asia and Oceania Perinatal Societies, the International Society of Perinatal Obstetricians.

[11]  Y. Ginsberg,et al.  The impact of extending the second stage of labor to prevent primary cesarean delivery on maternal and neonatal outcomes , 2019, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[12]  Inge Christoffer Olsen,et al.  The frequency of intrapartum caesarean section use with the WHO partograph versus Zhang's guideline in the Labour Progression Study (LaPS): a multicentre, cluster-randomised controlled trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[13]  Michael J Crowther,et al.  Using simulation studies to evaluate statistical methods , 2017, Statistics in medicine.

[14]  H. Venables,et al.  Intrapartum ultrasound assessment of cervical dilatation and its value in detecting active labor , 2018, Journal of Ultrasound.

[15]  Julia C Phillippi,et al.  Applying a physiologic partograph to Consortium on Safe Labor data to identify opportunities for safely decreasing cesarean births among nulliparous women , 2018, Birth.

[16]  A. Menciassi,et al.  Devices for Measuring Cervical Dilation During Labor: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. , 2018, Obstetrical & gynecological survey.

[17]  T. Quibel,et al.  Impact of recommended changes in labor management for prevention of the primary cesarean delivery , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[18]  H. Souza,et al.  Cervical dilatation patterns of ‘low‐risk’ women with spontaneous labour and normal perinatal outcomes: a systematic review , 2017, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[19]  T. Duan,et al.  The physiologic pattern of normal labour progression , 2017, BJOG: an International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology.

[20]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  The assessment of labor: a brief history , 2017, Journal of perinatal medicine.

[21]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Management of Labor: Are the New Guidelines Justified? , 2018, Journal of midwifery & women's health.

[22]  Joshua I. Rosenbloom,et al.  New labor management guidelines and changes in cesarean delivery patterns , 2017, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[23]  W. Cohen Clinical assessment of uterine contractions , 2017, International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics.

[24]  D. Nelson,et al.  Too close for comfort. , 2016, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[25]  J. Repke,et al.  Reduction in the Cesarean Delivery Rate After Obstetric Care Consensus Guideline Implementation , 2016, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[26]  P. Twomey,et al.  Why are clinical practice guidelines not followed? , 2016, Clinical chemistry and laboratory medicine.

[27]  V. Berghella,et al.  Randomized controlled trial of prolonged second stage: extending the time limit vs usual guidelines. , 2016, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[28]  Martin Offringa,et al.  Systematic reviews and meta-analysis. , 2015, Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine.

[29]  K. Salvesen,et al.  Agreement between transperineal ultrasound measurements and digital examinations of cervical dilatation during labor , 2015, BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth.

[30]  E. Ferrazzi,et al.  Progression of cervical dilatation in normal human labor is unpredictable , 2015, Acta obstetricia et gynecologica Scandinavica.

[31]  J. Troendle,et al.  Statistical aspects of modeling the labor curve. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[32]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Misguided guidelines for managing labor. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[33]  M. Abrahamowicz,et al.  A cluster-randomized trial to reduce cesarean delivery rates in Quebec. , 2015, The New England journal of medicine.

[34]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Perils of the new labor management guidelines. , 2015, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[35]  Gynecologists Obstetric care consensus no. 1: safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[36]  Jeanne-Marie Guise,et al.  Safe prevention of the primary cesarean delivery. , 2014, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[37]  M. Varner,et al.  Maternal obesity and contraction strength in the first stage of labor. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[38]  S. Laughon,et al.  Changes in labor patterns over 50 years. , 2012, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[39]  Marjolein Lugtenberg,et al.  Perceived barriers to guideline adherence: A survey among general practitioners , 2011, BMC family practice.

[40]  J. Pezzullo,et al.  Variability in rate of cervical dilation in nulliparous women at term. , 2011, Birth.

[41]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Contemporary Patterns of Spontaneous Labor With Normal Neonatal Outcomes , 2010, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[42]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Contemporary cesarean delivery practice in the United States. , 2010, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[43]  R. Mikolajczyk,et al.  The Natural History of the Normal First Stage of Labor , 2010, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[44]  J. Christie,et al.  Planning a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial: Methodological Issues , 2009, Nursing research.

[45]  K. Weizsaecker,et al.  Labour characteristics and neonatal Erb’s palsy , 2007, BJOG : an international journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[46]  H. V. van Geijn,et al.  Elevated uterine activity increases the risk of fetal acidosis at birth. , 2007, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[47]  Ofer Barnea,et al.  Continuous monitoring of cervical dilatation and fetal head station during labor. , 2007, Medical engineering & physics.

[48]  R. Romero,et al.  Childbirth and the Pelvic Floor , 2006 .

[49]  L. Pilotto,et al.  Cluster randomized controlled trials in primary care: An introduction , 2006, The European journal of general practice.

[50]  J. Troendle,et al.  Methodological challenges in studying labour progression in contemporary practice. , 2006, Paediatric and perinatal epidemiology.

[51]  D. Torgerson,et al.  Cluster randomized controlled trials. , 2005, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[52]  R. Sokol,et al.  Is abnormal labor associated with shoulder dystocia in nulliparous women? , 2004, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[53]  C. Weiner,et al.  Intrauterine pressure during the second stage of labor in obese women. , 2004, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[54]  Jun Zhang,et al.  Reassessing the labor curve in nulliparous women. , 2002, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[55]  L Impey,et al.  Graphic analysis of actively managed labor: prospective computation of labor progress in 500 consecutive nulliparous women in spontaneous labor at term. , 2000, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[56]  M. Cabana,et al.  Why don't physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. , 1999, JAMA.

[57]  J C Lindsey,et al.  Tutorial in biostatistics methods for interval-censored data. , 1998, Statistics in medicine.

[58]  H. Wallenburg,et al.  Assessment of cervical dilatation during labor: a review. , 1991, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[59]  G. Valenzuela,et al.  Real-time microcomputer-based analysis of spontaneous and augmented labor. , 1990, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[60]  Hal R. Varian,et al.  GOODNESS-OF-FIT IN OPTIMIZING MODELS , 1989 .

[61]  M. Rosen,et al.  Transition from Latent to Active Labor , 1986, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[62]  M. Carter,et al.  The effect of oxytocin infusion on uterine activity levels in slow labour , 1985, British journal of obstetrics and gynaecology.

[63]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Long-term effects of labor and delivery on offspring: a matched-pair analysis. , 1984, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[64]  H. Hopwood Shoulder dystocia: fifteen years' experience in a community hospital. , 1982, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[65]  L. A. Sutherland,et al.  A Cervimeter for Continuous Measurement of Cervical Dilatation in Labour‐Preliminary Results. , 1978 .

[66]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional labor XII. Long-term effects on infant. , 1977, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[67]  R. Sokol,et al.  Normal and abnormal labor progress: I. A quantitative assessment and survey of the literature. , 1977, Journal of reproductive medicine.

[68]  W. Witting,et al.  THE USE OF A CERVICAL DILATATION GRAPH IN THE MANAGEMENT OF PRIMIGRAVIDAE IN LABOUR , 1972, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[69]  R. H. Philpott,et al.  CERVICOGRAPHS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOUR IN PRIMIGRAVIDAE , 1972, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[70]  R. H. Philpott,et al.  CERVICOGRAPHS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF LABOUR IN PRIMIGRAVIDAE , 1972, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[71]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Computer analysis of labor progression. V. Effects of fetal presentation and position. , 1972, Journal of reproductive medicine.

[72]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Computer analysis of labor progression. IV. Diagnosis of secondary arrest of dilatation. , 1971, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[73]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Computer analysis of labor progression. 3. Pattern variations by parity. , 1971, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[74]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Computer analysis of labor progression. II. Distribution of data and limits of normal. , 1971, The Journal of reproductive medicine.

[75]  W. Brenner,et al.  Normal cervical dilatation pattern in late pregnancy and labor. , 1970, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[76]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional labor. IX. Delivery outcome. , 1970, American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[77]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  COMPUTER ANALYSIS OF LABOUR PROGRESSION , 1969, The Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of the British Commonwealth.

[78]  W. Ledger Monitoring of Labor by Graphs , 1969, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[79]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional Labor: X. Immediate Results to Infant , 1969, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[80]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional Labor: XI. Neurologic and Developmental Effects on Surviving Infants , 1969, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[81]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional Labor: VIII. Relative Accuracy of Clinical and Graphic Diagnostic Methods , 1969, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[82]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Prognostic significance of the labor pattern in multiparas. , 1967, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[83]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional Labor: VII. A Comprehensive Program for Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management , 1965, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[84]  W. Ledger,et al.  Practical Applications of the Graphic Portrayal of Labor , 1964, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[85]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Amniotomy and the Course of Labor , 1963, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[86]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional Labor: VI. Abnormal Progress in the Multipara , 1963, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[87]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional Labor V. Therapeutic Trial of Oxytocin in Secondary Arrest , 1963, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[88]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  ELECTRONIC CERVIMETER: A RESEARCH INSTRUMENT FOR THE STUDY OF CERVICAL DILATATION IN LABOR. , 1963, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[89]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Determinant role of initial cervical dilatation on the course of labor. , 1962, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[90]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional Labor: III. Secondary Arrest of Dilatation in the Nullipara , 1962, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[91]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional labor. IV. Combined aberrant dilatation patterns in the nullipara. , 1962, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[92]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional Labor: II. Protracted Active‐Phase Dilatation in the Nullipara , 1961, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[93]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Dysfunctional labor. I. Prolonged latent phase in the nullipara. , 1961, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[94]  E. A. Friedman Trial of labor; formulation, application, and retrospective clinical evaluation. , 1957, Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[95]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Cervimetry: an objective method for the study of cervical dilatation in labor. , 1956, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[96]  E. A. Friedman Labor in multiparas; a graphicostatistical analysis. , 1956, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[97]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  Primigravid labor; a graphicostatistical analysis. , 1955, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[98]  E. A. Friedman,et al.  The graphic analysis of labor. , 1959, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.