Semantic activation in action planning.

Four experiments investigated activation of semantic information in action preparation. Participants either prepared to grasp and use an object (e.g., to drink from a cup) or to lift a finger in association with the object's position following a go/no-go lexical-decision task. Word stimuli were consistent to the action goals of the object use (Experiment 1) or to the finger lifting (Experiment 2). Movement onset times yielded a double dissociation of consistency effects between action preparation and word processing. This effect was also present for semantic categorizations (Experiment 3), but disappeared when introducing a letter identification task (Experiment 4). In sum, our findings indicate that action semantics are activated selectively in accordance with the specific action intention of an actor.

[1]  Jacob Cohen.  Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.

[2]  R. Davidson,et al.  Consciousness and Self-Regulation: Advances in Research and Theory IV , 1976 .

[3]  Wayne D. Gray,et al.  Basic objects in natural categories , 1976, Cognitive Psychology.

[4]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to action: Willed and automatic control , 1980 .

[5]  D. Norman,et al.  Attention to Action: Willed and Automatic Control of Behavior Technical Report No. 8006. , 1980 .

[6]  D. Rosenbaum.  The Movement Precuing Technique: Assumptions, Applications, and Extensions , 1983 .

[7]  Richard A. Magill,et al.  Memory and control of action , 1983 .

[8]  Barry Gordon,et al.  Lexical access and lexical decision: Mechanisms of frequency sensitivity. , 1983 .

[9]  M. Vanderwart,et al.  Priming by pictures in lexical decision , 1984 .

[10]  Eric A. Roy,et al.  Neuropsychological studies of apraxia and related disorders , 1985 .

[11]  A. Allport,et al.  Selection for action: Some behavioral and neurophysiological considerations of attention and action , 1987 .

[12]  H. Heuer,et al.  Perspectives on Perception and Action , 1989 .

[13]  R. Klatzky.  The role of motor representations in semantic sensibility judgments , 1989 .

[14]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Routes to action: Evidence from apraxia , 1989 .

[15]  J. Cañas,et al.  Phonetic and semantic activation during picture and word naming , 1989 .

[16]  Gavin Burnage.  Celex-a guide for users , 1990 .

[17]  J. H. Neely.  Semantic priming effects in visual word recognition: A selective review of current findings and theories. , 1991 .

[18]  Roger Ratcliff,et al.  Methods for Dealing With Reaction Time Outliers , 1992 .

[19]  Susan J. Lederman,et al.  Cognitive representations of functional interactions with objects , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[20]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Basic processes in reading : visual word recognition , 1993 .

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Space and selective attention , 1994 .

[22]  Avishai Henik,et al.  Capacity demands of automatic processes in semantic priming , 1994, Memory & cognition.

[23]  Myrna F. Schwartz,et al.  Of cabbages and things: Semantic memory from a neuropsychological perspective—A tutorial review. , 1994 .

[24]  M. Masson,et al.  Using confidence intervals in within-subject designs , 1994, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[25]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Discrete Cortical Regions Associated with Knowledge of Color and Knowledge of Action , 1995, Science.

[26]  Edgar Erdfelder,et al.  GPOWER: A general power analysis program , 1996 .

[27]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge , 1996, Nature.

[28]  Derek Besner,et al.  Role of set in visual word recognition: Activation and activation blocking as nonautomatic processes. , 1996 .

[29]  B. Hommel,et al.  Blindness to response-compatible stimuli. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[30]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Premotor Cortex Activation during Observation and Naming of Familiar Tools , 1997, NeuroImage.

[31]  Derek Besner,et al.  The stroop effect and the myth of automaticity , 1997, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[32]  L. Buxbaum,et al.  The Role of Semantic Memory in Object Use , 1997 .

[33]  T. Shallice,et al.  Modality-Specific Operations in Semantic Dementia , 1997, Cortex.

[34]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Recognition by action: dissociating visual and semantic routes to action in normal observers. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[35]  Linda Cupples,et al.  A Semantic Subsystem of Visual Attributes , 1998 .

[36]  R. Ellis,et al.  On the relations between seen objects and components of potential actions. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[37]  M Gentilucci,et al.  Influence of automatic word reading on motor control , 1998, The European journal of neuroscience.

[38]  Umberto Castiello,et al.  Semantic category interference effects upon thereach-to-grasp movement , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  F. Pulvermüller,et al.  Words in the brain's language , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[40]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action for perception: a motor-visual attentional effect. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[41]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Action planning and the temporal binding of response codes , 1999 .

[42]  M. Lucas,et al.  Semantic priming without association: A meta-analytic review , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[43]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  One more cup of coffee for the road: object–action assemblies, response blocking and response capture after frontal lobe damage , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[44]  R. Ellis,et al.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects. , 2000, British journal of psychology.

[45]  A. Wohlschläger,et al.  Visual motion priming by invisible actions , 2000, Vision Research.

[46]  M. Gentilucci,et al.  Language and motor control , 2000, Experimental Brain Research.

[47]  Alex Martin,et al.  Representation of Manipulable Man-Made Objects in the Dorsal Stream , 2000, NeuroImage.

[48]  T Shallice,et al.  A Form of Ideational Apraxia as a Delective Deficit of Contention Scheduling , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[49]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[50]  Sarah H. Creem,et al.  Grasping objects by their handles: a necessary interaction between cognition and action. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[51]  L. Buxbaum.  Ideomotor Apraxia: a Call to Action , 2001, Neurocase.

[52]  J. Müsseler,et al.  Can Actions Affect Perceptual Processing? , 2001, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[53]  G. Humphreys,et al.  Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits , 2001, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[54]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Posture-based motion planning: applications to grasping. , 2001, Psychological review.

[55]  K. McGregor,et al.  Semantic representation and naming in young children. , 2002, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[56]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[57]  P. Dixon,et al.  Semantics affect the planning but not control of grasping , 2002, Experimental Brain Research.

[58]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Visual Search Is Modulated by Action Intentions , 2002, Psychological science.

[59]  R. Adolphs,et al.  NEURAL CORRELATES OF CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE FOR ACTIONS , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[60]  Laurie A Stowe,et al.  An event-related potential investigation of the relationship between semantic and perceptual levels of representation , 2003, Brain and Language.

[61]  D. Rosenbaum,et al.  Grasping the meaning of words , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[62]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Perceiving virtual geographical slant: action influences perception. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[63]  C. Mateer,et al.  Utilization Behavior: Clinical Manifestations and Neurological Mechanisms , 2001, Neuropsychology Review.

[64]  S. Glover,et al.  Separate visual representations in the planning and control of action , 2004, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[65]  B. Hommel.  Event files: feature binding in and across perception and action , 2004, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  Rolf Ulrich,et al.  Preparing for Action: Inferences from CNV and LRP , 2004 .

[67]  Sarah H. Creem-Regehr,et al.  Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special? , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[68]  H. Bekkering,et al.  Selection-for-action in visual search. , 2005, Acta psychologica.

[69]  A. A. Wijers,et al.  Processing of visual semantic information to concrete words: temporal dynamics and neural mechanisms indicated by event-related brain potentials , 2005, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[70]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Action-feature integration blinds to feature-overlapping perceptual events: Evidence from manual and vocal actions , 2006, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.