Use of the critical incident technique for qualitative research in engineering education

The critical incident technique is a well-established qualitative research method that is useful in exploring significant experiences in order to better understand resulting behavior. The critical incident technique is emerging as a tool for research and for building theories in engineering education. 1, 2 This paper describes the initial state of a grounded theory study. The purpose of the larger study is to develop a theory that relates how students perceive the role of their family in making engineering-related academic decisions. The population under study is first generation college students. Specifically, this paper describes the development of an interview protocol based on the critical incident technique and demonstrates its usage in drawing out thick, rich descriptions which help increase the trustworthiness of qualitative research. Initial interview data are presented to highlight our usage of the critical incident technique to elicit specific information about how participants experienced various critical family interactions that influenced academic decisions about engineering. This paper contributes to the engineering education body of literature by illustrating the critical incident technique and discussing the advantages and disadvantages of the approach for other researchers who may seek to employ the critical incident technique for their own work.

[1]  E. Seymour,et al.  Talking About Leaving: Why Undergraduates Leave The Sciences , 1997 .

[2]  Paul D. Schreuders,et al.  ALL IN THE (ENGINEERING) FAMILY? THE FAMILY OCCUPATIONAL BACKGROUND OF MEN AND WOMEN ENGINEERING STUDENTS , 2007 .

[3]  M. Daniels,et al.  Stepping Stones: Capacity building in engineering education , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[4]  J. Trenor,et al.  First generation college students in engineering: A qualitative investigation of barriers to academic plans , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[5]  E. Brink,et al.  Constructing grounded theory : A practical guide through qualitative analysis , 2006 .

[6]  Julie Martin Trenor,et al.  The Relations of Ethnicity to Female Engineering Students' Educational Experiences and College and Career Plans in an Ethnically Diverse Learning Environment , 2008 .

[7]  R C Atkinson,et al.  Supply and Demand for Scientists and Engineers: A National Crisis in the Making , 1990, Science.

[8]  R. Fisk,et al.  The impact of other customers on service experiences: A critical incident examination of “getting along” , 1997 .

[9]  Sharan B. Merriam,et al.  Qualitative research and case study applications in education , 1998 .

[10]  N. Lin Foundations of social research , 1976 .

[11]  Mary Jo Bitner,et al.  The Service Encounter: Diagnosing Favorable and Unfavorable Incidents: , 1990 .

[12]  J. Trenor,et al.  Influences for selecting engineering: Insights on access to Social Capital from two case studies , 2008, 2008 38th Annual Frontiers in Education Conference.

[13]  S. Kvale Interviews : an introduction to qualitative research interviewing , 1996 .

[14]  Pamela Jordan Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques , 1994 .

[15]  Peggy Layne,et al.  Diversity in engineering: managing the workforce of the future , 2002 .

[16]  Daryl E. Chubin,et al.  Diversifying the Engineering Workforce , 2005 .

[17]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .