Integrated methodology for the evaluation of cleaning effectiveness in two Russian icons (16th–17th centuries)

This article covers a methodology for evaluating the effectiveness of cleaning two Russian icons. The icons belong to a group of five from the same iconographic school, dating from the 16th to 17th centuries. An integrated and complementary approach to varnish and overpaint removal involved microscopic techniques (optical and scanning electron microscopy) and colorimetry (CIE L*a*b* system). The materials and techniques used in these icons have been characterized previously. Cleaning revealed extensive overpainting that had not only dramatically changed the original appearance, but also the meaning and attribution of one of the two icons. The analyses carried out were useful in determining the extent of the overpainting and led to a better assessment of the results and effectiveness of the restoration. Microsc. Res. Tech. 73:752–760, 2010. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  Rocco Mazzeo,et al.  Scientific Examination for the Investigation of Paintings: A Handbook for Conservator-Restorers , 2011 .

[2]  S. Bracci,et al.  Integrated analytical study for the authentication of five Russian icons (XVI–XVII centuries) , 2009, Microscopy research and technique.

[3]  Evelyne Darque-Ceretti,et al.  The surface of cultural heritage artefacts: physicochemical investigations for their knowledge and their conservation. , 2007, Chemical Society reviews.

[4]  W. Wei,et al.  Characterisation of the varnish-object interface using white light confocal profilometry , 2007, SPIE Optical Metrology.

[5]  C. Rhyne.  Clean Art? , 2006 .

[6]  M. Otte.  Los Angeles: The Getty Conservation Institute , 2003 .

[7]  R. Wolbers.  The use of a synthetic soiling mixture as a means for evaluating the efficacy of aqueous cleaning materials on painted surfaces , 1992 .

[8]  Aviva Burnstock,et al.  Changes in the surface characteristics of artificially aged mastic varnishes after cleaning using alkaline reagents , 1992 .

[9]  S. Michalski.  A PHYSICAL MODEL OF THE CLEANING OF OIL PAINT , 1990 .

[10]  P. Hetherington.  The 'Painter's Manual' of Dionysius of Fourna , 1974 .

[11]  E. Gombrich.  Controversial methods and methods of controversy , 1963 .

[12]  Klaas Jan van den Berg,et al.  A COMPARISON OF LIGHT MICROSCOPY TECHNIQUES WITH SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY FOR IMAGING THE SURFACE CLEANING OF PAINTINGS , 2008 .

[13]  Tom Learner,et al.  Modern paints uncovered , 2007 .

[14]  P. Cremonesi.  L'uso dei solventi organici nella pulitura di opere policrome , 2000 .

[15]  Raymond White,et al.  GC-MS and SEM studies on the effects of solvent cleaning on old master paintings from the National Gallery, London , 1998 .

[16]  N. Khandekar,et al.  Pilot study into the effects of solvents on artificially aged egg tempera films , 1994 .

[17]  S. Shah,et al.  Analysis of surface roughness using confocal microscopy , 1993, Journal of Materials Science.

[18]  Giuseppina Perusini,et al.  Il restauro dei dipinti e delle sculture lignee : storia, teorie e tecniche , 1989 .

[19]  H. Ruhemann.  The Cleaning of Paintings , 1968 .

[20]  Brandi Cesare,et al.  Teoria del restauro , 1963 .