The Role of Interneurons in Shaping Purkinje Cell Responses in the Cerebellar Cortex

The well established anatomy of the cerebellar cortex has led to suggestions that cerebellar molecular layer interneurons laterally inhibit Purkinje cells. In support of the anatomical predictions, on-beam excitation and off-beam inhibition of Purkinje cells have been shown to occur when the surface of the cerebellum is electrically excited. Patchy excitation of Purkinje cells with flanking inhibition of sagittally oriented Purkinje cells have also been demonstrated following peripheral stimulation in vivo. To extend these observations, we mapped the functional connectivity between granule cells, molecular layer interneurons, and Purkinje cells in rats. Patches of granule cells were asynchronously activated by photostimulation to mimic their excitation by a mossy fiber as it occurs in vivo. We found with remarkable consistency that, in the sagittal orientation, granule cells elicit a stereotypic set of responses. Granule cells immediately underneath a Purkinje cell provide pure excitation. Granule cells positioned 340–400 μm laterally provided pure inhibition, consistent with the lateral inhibition proposed earlier. The net effect of exciting granule cells in between these two extremes was to provide a systematic change in the response of Purkinje cells, from net excitation to net inhibition moving laterally from the Purkinje cell. In contrast to the sagittal orientation, in the coronal orientation the organization of Purkinje cell responses with granule cell activation was remarkably different. Independent of the location of granule cells, within the 480 μm lateral distance examined, molecular layer interneurons reduced the strength of granule cell inputs to Purkinje cells to a comparable extent.

[1]  Kamran Khodakhah,et al.  The Functional Equivalence of Ascending and Parallel Fiber Inputs in Cerebellar Computation , 2009, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[2]  M. Häusser,et al.  Integration of quanta in cerebellar granule cells during sensory processing , 2004, Nature.

[3]  J. Crabbe,et al.  A mouse model of episodic ataxia type-1 , 2003, Nature Neuroscience.

[4]  J SZENTAGOTHAI,et al.  THE USE OF DEGENERATION METHODS IN THE INVESTIGATION OF SHORT NEURONAL CONNEXIONS. , 1965, Progress in brain research.

[5]  Rafael Yuste,et al.  RuBi-Glutamate: Two-Photon and Visible-Light Photoactivation of Neurons and Dendritic spines , 2009, Front. Neural Circuits.

[6]  Kanichay Rt,et al.  Synaptic and Cellular Properties of the Feedforward Inhibitory Circuit within the Input Layer of the Cerebellar Cortex , 2008 .

[7]  D. Friel,et al.  Enhanced Synaptic Inhibition Disrupts the Efferent Code of Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons in Leaner Cav2.1 Ca2+ Channel Mutant Mice , 2012, The Cerebellum.

[8]  James M. Bower,et al.  Model-Founded Explorations of the Roles of Molecular Layer Inhibition in Regulating Purkinje Cell Responses in Cerebellar Cortex: More Trouble for the Beam Hypothesis , 2010, Front. Cell. Neurosci..

[9]  James M. Bower,et al.  Prolonged responses in rat cerebellar Purkinje cells following activation of the granule cell layer: an intracellular in vitro and in vivo investigation , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[10]  M. Häusser,et al.  High-fidelity transmission of sensory information by single cerebellar mossy fibre boutons , 2007, Nature.

[11]  S. Dieudonné,et al.  Submillisecond kinetics and low efficacy of parallel fibre‐Golgi cell synaptic currents in the rat cerebellum , 1998, The Journal of physiology.

[12]  Henrik Jörntell,et al.  Properties of Somatosensory Synaptic Integration in Cerebellar Granule Cells In Vivo , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  D. Rossi,et al.  Spillover-Mediated Transmission at Inhibitory Synapses Promoted by High Affinity α6 Subunit GABAA Receptors and Glomerular Geometry , 1998, Neuron.

[14]  M. Häusser,et al.  Tonic Synaptic Inhibition Modulates Neuronal Output Pattern and Spatiotemporal Synaptic Integration , 1997, Neuron.

[15]  R. Harvey,et al.  Number of parallel fiber synapses on an individual Purkinje cell in the cerebellum of the rat , 1988, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[16]  Y Yarom,et al.  Patches of synchronized activity in the cerebellar cortex evoked by mossy-fiber stimulation: questioning the role of parallel fibers. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[17]  R Angus Silver,et al.  Synaptic and Cellular Properties of the Feedforward Inhibitory Circuit within the Input Layer of the Cerebellar Cortex , 2008, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[18]  S. Wang,et al.  In vivo calcium imaging of circuit activity in cerebellar cortex. , 2005, Journal of neurophysiology.

[19]  J. Bower,et al.  Feedforward inhibition controls the spread of granule cell-induced Purkinje cell activity in the cerebellar cortex. , 2007, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  Bruce P. Bean,et al.  Ionic Currents Underlying Spontaneous Action Potentials in Isolated Cerebellar Purkinje Neurons , 1999, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  伊藤 正男 The cerebellum and neural control , 1984 .

[22]  W. T. Thach Discharge of Purkinje and cerebellar nuclear neurons during rapidly alternating arm movements in the monkey. , 1968, Journal of neurophysiology.

[23]  J M Bower,et al.  Quantitative Golgi study of the rat cerebellar molecular layer interneurons using principal component analysis , 1998, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[24]  Professor Dr. John C. Eccles,et al.  The Cerebellum as a Neuronal Machine , 1967, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[25]  Y Yarom,et al.  Unravelling cerebellar circuitry: an optical imaging study. , 2000, Progress in brain research.

[26]  Prof. Dr. Sanford L. Palay,et al.  Cerebellar Cortex , 1974, Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

[27]  J. Eccles The cerebellum as a computer: patterns in space and time. , 1973, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  Michael Häusser,et al.  Linking Synaptic Plasticity and Spike Output at Excitatory and Inhibitory Synapses onto Cerebellar Purkinje Cells , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[29]  Calcium Influx Measured at Single Presynaptic Boutons of Cerebellar Granule Cell Ascending Axons and Parallel Fibers , 2012, The Cerebellum.

[30]  Y. Yarom,et al.  Cerebellar on-beam and lateral inhibition: two functionally distinct circuits. , 2000, Journal of neurophysiology.

[31]  Gang Chen,et al.  Cerebellar Cortical Molecular Layer Inhibition Is Organized in Parasagittal Zones , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[32]  R. Harvey,et al.  Quantitatives studies on the mammalian cerebellum , 1991, Progress in Neurobiology.

[33]  Kamran Khodakhah,et al.  The Linear Computational Algorithm of Cerebellar Purkinje Cells , 2006, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[34]  David Attwell,et al.  Tonic and Spillover Inhibition of Granule Cells Control Information Flow through Cerebellar Cortex , 2002, Neuron.

[35]  J. Eccles,et al.  POSTSYNAPTIC INHIBITION OF CEREBELLAR PURKINJE CELLS. , 1964, Journal of neurophysiology.

[36]  F. Sultan,et al.  Distribution of mossy fibre rosettes in the cerebellum of cat and mice: evidence for a parasagittal organization at the single fibre level , 2001, The European journal of neuroscience.

[37]  Michael Häusser,et al.  Feed‐forward inhibition shapes the spike output of cerebellar Purkinje cells , 2005, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  W. T. Thach Discharge of cerebellar neurons related to two maintained postures and two prompt movements. II. Purkinje cell output and input. , 1970, Journal of neurophysiology.

[39]  J. Nadal,et al.  Optimal Information Storage and the Distribution of Synaptic Weights Perceptron versus Purkinje Cell , 2004, Neuron.

[40]  William Wisden,et al.  Synaptic inhibition of Purkinje cells mediates consolidation of vestibulo-cerebellar motor learning , 2009, Nature Neuroscience.

[41]  Joy T. Walter and,et al.  The advantages of linear information processing for cerebellar computation , 2009, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.