Knowledge‐based dose prediction models for head and neck cancer are strongly affected by interorgan dependency and dataset inconsistency

PURPOSE The goal of this study was to generate a large treatment plan database for head and neck (H&N) cancer patients that can be considered as the gold standard to train and validate models for knowledge-based (KB) treatment planning and QA. With this dataset, the intrinsic prediction performance, the effect of interorgan dependency, and the impact of dataset inconsistency was investigated for an existing treatment planning QA model. METHODS The CT scans of 108 previously treated oropharyngeal patients were used to establish the plan database. For each patient, 15 Pareto optimal treatment plans with different planning priorities for the parotid glands were generated with fully automatic multicriterial treatment planning (1620 plans in total). For each of the 15 sets of plans in the database, a KB model was trained with 54 patients and validated on the other 54 by comparing the predictions with the achieved doses. The dose prediction accuracy (predicted-achieved) of the KB models was assessed and compared among the different models to characterize the intrinsic performance and effect of interorgan dependency. In addition, the effect of dataset inconsistency with respect to planning prioritizations was investigated by mixing plans with different prioritizations, for the training, the validation dataset, and for both combined. RESULTS In the case of a high planning priority, the mean ± SD of the prediction error for the mean dose of the parotid glands was only 0.2 ± 2.2 Gy, but this increased to 1.0 ± 5.0 Gy in the case that the parotid glands had a low planning priority. Dataset inconsistency (in planning priority) led to a large increase in prediction error for the parotid glands (mean ± SD) from 0.2 ± 2.2 Gy to 2.8 ± 3.3 Gy, -3.2 ± 5.0 Gy or -0.6 ± 5.4 Gy, depending on the way the datasets were mixed. CONCLUSIONS The generated plan database can be used to validate and characterize KB prediction models for H&N cancer and will be made available upon request. The investigated KB model performed well in case the parotid glands had a high planning priority (little dependence on lower priority OARs), but poorly for organs for which the dose strongly depends on other higher priority OARs. To improve the performance of KB prediction models for H&N cancer, interorgan dependency should be modeled and accounted for. Dataset inconsistency has a large negative impact on the prediction errors of KB models and should be avoided as much as possible.

[1]  Steven F Petit,et al.  Accurate prediction of target dose-escalation and organ-at-risk dose levels for non-small cell lung cancer patients. , 2015, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[2]  Frank Schneider,et al.  A global quality assurance system for personalized radiation therapy treatment planning for the prostate (or other sites) , 2014, Physics in medicine and biology.

[3]  Fang-Fang Yin,et al.  A planning quality evaluation tool for prostate adaptive IMRT based on machine learning. , 2011, Medical physics.

[4]  Patricio Simari,et al.  Fully automated simultaneous integrated boosted-intensity modulated radiation therapy treatment planning is feasible for head-and-neck cancer: a prospective clinical study. , 2012, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[5]  Satomi Shiraishi,et al.  Knowledge-based prediction of three-dimensional dose distributions for external beam radiotherapy. , 2015, Medical physics.

[6]  J. Lo,et al.  A knowledge-based approach to improving and homogenizing intensity modulated radiation therapy planning quality among treatment centers: an example application to prostate cancer planning. , 2013, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[7]  Steven F Petit,et al.  Evaluation of plan quality assurance models for prostate cancer patients based on fully automatically generated Pareto-optimal treatment plans , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  Johannes A Langendijk,et al.  Predictive modelling for swallowing dysfunction after primary (chemo)radiation: results of a prospective observational study. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[9]  Sebastiaan Breedveld,et al.  Multi-criteria optimization and decision-making in radiotherapy , 2019 .

[10]  Todd McNutt,et al.  A quality control model that uses PTV-rectal distances to predict the lowest achievable rectum dose, improves IMRT planning for patients with prostate cancer. , 2013, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[11]  Jun Tan,et al.  Knowledge-based prediction of plan quality metrics in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery. , 2015, Medical physics.

[12]  Aaron Babier,et al.  Knowledge‐based automated planning for oropharyngeal cancer , 2018, Medical physics.

[13]  Chris McIntosh,et al.  Voxel-based dose prediction with multi-patient atlas selection for automated radiotherapy treatment planning , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[14]  David A. Jaffray,et al.  Fully automated treatment planning for head and neck radiotherapy using a voxel-based dose prediction and dose mimicking method , 2016, Physics in medicine and biology.

[15]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  A Shape Relationship Descriptor for Radiation Therapy Planning , 2009, MICCAI.

[16]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Patient geometry-driven information retrieval for IMRT treatment plan quality control. , 2009, Medical physics.

[17]  P. Voet,et al.  Fully automated volumetric modulated arc therapy plan generation for prostate cancer patients. , 2014, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[18]  Russell H. Taylor,et al.  Data-driven approach to generating achievable dose-volume histogram objectives in intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[19]  Ben J M Heijmen,et al.  iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[20]  P. Storchi,et al.  The equivalence of multi-criteria methods for radiotherapy plan optimization , 2009, Physics in medicine and biology.

[21]  Steven F Petit,et al.  Increased organ sparing using shape-based treatment plan optimization for intensity modulated radiation therapy of pancreatic adenocarcinoma. , 2012, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[22]  Sasa Mutic,et al.  Predicting dose-volume histograms for organs-at-risk in IMRT planning. , 2012, Medical physics.

[23]  Y. Ge,et al.  Quantitative analysis of the factors which affect the interpatient organ-at-risk dose sparing variation in IMRT plans. , 2012, Medical physics.

[24]  Binbin Wu,et al.  Improved robotic stereotactic body radiation therapy plan quality and planning efficacy for organ-confined prostate cancer utilizing overlap-volume histogram-driven planning methodology. , 2014, Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology.

[25]  Randall K Ten Haken,et al.  Parotid gland function after radiotherapy: the combined michigan and utrecht experience. , 2008, International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics.

[26]  D. Low,et al.  Experience-based quality control of clinical intensity-modulated radiotherapy planning. , 2011, International Journal of Radiation Oncology, Biology, Physics.

[27]  R. Steenbakkers,et al.  Late effects in head and neck radiotherapy Development of a multivariable normal tissue complication probability ( NTCP ) model for tube feeding dependence after curative radiotherapy / chemo-radiotherapy in head and neck cancer , 2014 .

[28]  Timothy C. Y. Chan,et al.  Automated Treatment Planning in Radiation Therapy using Generative Adversarial Networks , 2018, MLHC.