Surgeons’ physical discomfort and symptoms during robotic surgery: a comprehensive ergonomic survey study

BackgroundIt is commonly believed that robotic surgery systems provide surgeons with an ergonomically sound work environment; however, the actual experience of surgeons practicing robotic surgery (RS) has not been thoroughly researched. In this ergonomics survey study, we investigated surgeons’ physical symptom reports and their association with factors including demographics, specialties, and robotic systems.MethodsFour hundred and thirty-two surgeons regularly practicing RS completed this comprehensive survey comprising 20 questions in four categories: demographics, systems, ergonomics, and physical symptoms. Chi-square and multinomial logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analysis.ResultsTwo hundred and thirty-six surgeons (56.1 %) reported physical symptoms or discomfort. Among those symptoms, neck stiffness, finger, and eye fatigues were the most common. With the newest robot, eye symptom rate was considerably reduced, while neck and finger symptoms did not improve significantly. A high rate of lower back stiffness was correlated with higher annual robotic case volume, and eye symptoms were more common with longer years practicing robotic surgery (p < 0.05). The symptom report rate from urology surgeons was significantly higher than other specialties (p < 0.05). Noticeably, surgeons with higher confidence and helpfulness levels with their ergonomic settings reported lower symptom report rates. Symptoms were not correlated with age and gender.ConclusionAlthough RS provides relatively better ergonomics, this study demonstrates that 56.1 % of regularly practicing robotic surgeons still experience related physical symptoms or discomfort. In addition to system improvement, surgeon education in optimizing the ergonomic settings may be necessary to maximize the ergonomic benefits in RS.

[1]  Erik B. Wilson,et al.  The Evolution of Robotic General Surgery , 2009, Scandinavian journal of surgery : SJS : official organ for the Finnish Surgical Society and the Scandinavian Surgical Society.

[2]  Phillip Mucksavage,et al.  The da Vinci(®) Surgical System overcomes innate hand dominance. , 2011, Journal of endourology.

[3]  R. Muradore,et al.  Robotic Surgery , 2011, IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine.

[4]  J. Feinglass,et al.  Postoperative Outcomes After Robotic Versus Abdominal Myomectomy , 2013, JSLS : Journal of the Society of Laparoendoscopic Surgeons.

[5]  P. Dasgupta,et al.  Robotic‐assisted radical cystectomy , 2008, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[6]  M.A. van Veelen,et al.  Ergonomics in minimally invasive surgery , 2004, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[7]  Harry Quon,et al.  The effect of transoral robotic surgery on short‐term outcomes and cost of care after oropharyngeal cancer surgery , 2014, The Laryngoscope.

[8]  A. Mussi,et al.  Robotic lobectomy for lung cancer: evolution in technique and technology. , 2014, European journal of cardio-thoracic surgery : official journal of the European Association for Cardio-thoracic Surgery.

[9]  T. N. Payne,et al.  A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. , 2008, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[10]  Gyusung I. Lee,et al.  Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries , 2014, Surgical Endoscopy.

[11]  J. Felblinger,et al.  Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon's physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures , 2013, The international journal of medical robotics + computer assisted surgery : MRCAS.

[12]  Gerald Matthews,et al.  Mental workload and stress perceived by novice operators in the laparoscopic and robotic minimally invasive surgical interfaces. , 2012, Journal of endourology.

[13]  J. T. Dennerlein,et al.  Ergonomics and human factors in endoscopic surgery: a comparison of manual vs telerobotic simulation systems , 2005, Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques.

[14]  R Cichon,et al.  Robotic-enhanced arterial revascularization for multivessel coronary artery disease. , 2000, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[15]  The evolving role of robotic colorectal surgery. , 2011, Diseases of the colon and rectum.

[16]  S. Windecker,et al.  Two generations of the St. Jude Medical ATG coronary connector systems for coronary artery anastomoses in coronary artery bypass grafting. , 2002, The Annals of thoracic surgery.

[17]  J. Cadeddu,et al.  Robotic-Assisted Pyeloplasty:Recent Developments in Efficacy, Outcomes, and New Techniques , 2013, Current Urology Reports.

[18]  M. Menon,et al.  Robotic‐assisted partial nephrectomy , 2009, BJU international.

[19]  Vipul R Patel,et al.  Robotic radical prostatectomy in the community setting--the learning curve and beyond: initial 200 cases. , 2005, The Journal of urology.

[20]  T. Manchana,et al.  Feasibility and safety of robotic surgery for gynecologic cancers. , 2014, Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP.

[21]  J. Boggess,et al.  Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: evolution of a new surgical paradigm , 2007, Journal of robotic surgery.

[22]  A. Park,et al.  Patients benefit while surgeons suffer: an impending epidemic. , 2010, Journal of the American College of Surgeons.

[23]  Prithima Mosaly,et al.  Ergonomic deficits in robotic gynecologic oncology surgery: a need for intervention. , 2013, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[24]  M.A. van Veelen,et al.  Improved physical ergonomics of laparoscopic surgery , 2004, Minimally invasive therapy & allied technologies : MITAT : official journal of the Society for Minimally Invasive Therapy.

[25]  J. Joseph,et al.  Ergonomic evaluation and guidelines for use of the daVinci Robot system. , 2010, Journal of endourology.

[26]  Warren D. Smith,et al.  An ergonomic comparison of robotic and laparoscopic technique: the influence of surgeon experience and task complexity. , 2003, The Journal of surgical research.

[27]  M. Martino,et al.  A comparison of quality outcome measures in patients having a hysterectomy for benign disease: robotic vs. non-robotic approaches. , 2014, Journal of minimally invasive gynecology.

[28]  Guang-Zhong Yang,et al.  Current status of robotic assisted pelvic surgery and future developments. , 2009, International journal of surgery.

[29]  Linda Brubaker,et al.  Robotic Compared With Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy: A Randomized Controlled Trial , 2014, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[30]  A. Secord,et al.  Physical strain and urgent need for ergonomic training among gynecologic oncologists who perform minimally invasive surgery. , 2012, Gynecologic oncology.

[31]  Dimitrios Stefanidis,et al.  Robotic suturing on the FLS model possesses construct validity, is less physically demanding, and is favored by more surgeons compared with laparoscopy , 2011, Surgical Endoscopy.

[32]  B. Davies,et al.  Robotic surgery , 1993, IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Magazine.

[33]  Tristan D Yan,et al.  Systematic review of robotic minimally invasive mitral valve surgery. , 2013, Annals of cardiothoracic surgery.

[34]  J. Korndorffer,et al.  Robotic assistance improves intracorporeal suturing performance and safety in the operating room while decreasing operator workload , 2010, Surgical Endoscopy.

[35]  T. Hernandez-Boussard,et al.  The aching surgeon: a survey of physical discomfort and symptoms following open, laparoscopic, and robotic surgery , 2012, Journal of Robotic Surgery.

[36]  G. Weinstein,et al.  Transoral robotic surgery: does the ends justify the means? , 2009, Current opinion in otolaryngology & head and neck surgery.

[37]  R. Berguer,et al.  Postural ergonomics during robotic and laparoscopic gastric bypass surgery: a pilot project , 2007, Journal of robotic surgery.

[38]  W. Chung,et al.  Multicenter Study of Robotic Thyroidectomy: Short-Term Postoperative Outcomes and Surgeon Ergonomic Considerations , 2011, Annals of Surgical Oncology.

[39]  M. Munsell,et al.  Physician pain and discomfort during minimally invasive gynecologic cancer surgery. , 2014, Gynecologic oncology.

[40]  I. Broeders,et al.  Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery , 2008, Surgical Endoscopy.