Folk Theories about Sex and Race Differences

In a study assessing the nature of folk theories about the causes of sex and race differences and correlates of these theories, 464 undergraduates completed questionnaires concerning (a) causes of sex and race differences (e.g., socialization, opportunities, and biological factors), (b) the ease of eliminating differences, (c) perceptions of variability within and between the sexes, (d) intolerance of ambiguity, and (e) values concerning research on sex differences. Folk theories are similar for sex and race: Both social and biological factors are believed to cause differences, but social factors are considered more influential. Folk theories related to how the sexes were perceived. The more biology was believed to cause sex differences, the more the sexes were seen to differ. Folk theories were weakly correlated with intolerance of ambiguity. Students' values indicated that they believe it is important to detect and report sex differences even if errors occur because nonexistent sex differences are falsely reported.

[1]  K. Deaux,et al.  Structure of gender stereotypes: Interrelationships among components and gender label. , 1984 .

[2]  S. Scarr.  Race and gender as psychological variables. Social and ethical issues. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[3]  Earl C. Pence,et al.  Cognitive mechanisms mediating the biasing effects of leader sex on ratings of leader behavior , 1985 .

[4]  J. Eccles,et al.  Social Forces Shape Math Attitudes and Performance , 1986, Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society.

[5]  S. Shields.  Functionalism, Darwinism, and the Psychology of Women , 1975 .

[6]  C. Crawford.  George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and Arthur Jensen—are they compatible? , 1979 .

[7]  C. McCauley,et al.  An individual and quantitative measure of stereotypes. , 1978 .

[8]  S. Bem,et al.  If you are gender schematic, all members of the opposite sex look alike. , 1985 .

[9]  Spencer E. Cahill.  Reexamining the acquisition of sex roles: A social interactionist approach , 1983 .

[10]  E. Frenkel-Brunswik,et al.  Intolerance of ambiguity as an emotional and perceptual personality variable. , 1949, Psychological issues.

[11]  Frank R. Westie,et al.  The tolerant personality , 1959 .

[12]  M. Crawford.  Agreeing to Differ: Feminist Epistemologies and Women’s Ways of Knowing , 1989 .

[13]  D. Katz,et al.  Racial stereotypes of one hundred college students. , 1933 .

[14]  W. H. Angoff,et al.  The nature-nurture debate, aptitudes, and group differences. , 1988, The American psychologist.

[15]  D L Medin,et al.  Concepts and conceptual structure. , 1989, The American psychologist.

[16]  Eugene Borgida,et al.  Sex stereotypes and social judgment , 1980 .

[17]  R. Unger.  Toward a redefinition of sex and gender. , 1979 .

[18]  M. D. Storms.  Sex Role Identity and Its Relationships to Sex Role Attributes and Sex Role Stereotypes. , 1979 .

[19]  E. Midlarsky,et al.  Empirically derived conceptions of femaleness and maleness: A current view , 1985 .

[20]  Jeanne Marecek,et al.  The Meaning Of Difference: Gender Theory, Postmodernism, And Psychology , 1988 .

[21]  P. Devine.  Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components. , 1989 .

[22]  Martha E Thompson.  Sex differences: Differential access to power or sex-role socialization? , 1981 .

[23]  S. Rosser.  Good science: Can it ever be gender free? , 1988 .

[24]  S. Katz.  Sexualization and the lateralized brain: From craniometry to pornography , 1988 .

[25]  N. Feather.  Masculinity, femininity, psychological androgyny, and the structure of values. , 1984 .

[26]  S. Bem.  Gender schema theory: A cognitive account of sex typing. , 1981 .

[27]  E. Fee.  Nineteenth-century craniology: the study of the female skull. , 1979, Bulletin of The History of Medicine.

[28]  W. Stroebe,et al.  Stereotype, Prejudice, and Discrimination: Changing Conceptions in Theory and Research , 1989 .

[29]  K. Deaux.  From individual differences to social categories: analysis of a decade's research on gender , 1984 .

[30]  Jacqui Smith,et al.  Why do males and females differ? Children's beliefs about sex differences , 1984 .

[31]  C. Jacklin.  Methodological issues in the study of sex-related differences , 1981 .

[32]  R. Archer.  Relationships between locus of control, trait anxiety, and state anxiety: an interactionist perspective. , 1979, Journal of personality.

[33]  C. Martin.  A ratio measure of sex stereotyping , 1987 .

[34]  Charles F. Halverson,et al.  A schematic processing model of sex typing and stereotyping in children. , 1981 .

[35]  Y. Bar‐Tal.  Can Leaders Change Followers' Stereotypes? , 1989 .

[36]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Reporting sex differences. , 1987 .