Single unit clues to cochlear mechanisms

In recent years studies on isolated hair cells have suggested that there is an inherent tuning of hair cells determined by their mechanical and electrical properties. However, tuning for mammalian cochleas appears to be much more complicated since there are typically two types of receptor cells (inner and outer hair cells) imbedded in a highly organized framework of supporting cells, membranes and fluids. The major neural output of the cochlea can be monitored by recording the activity of myelinated axons of spiral ganglion cells, not only under normal conditions, but also when the discharge patterns are altered by ototoxic drugs, acoustic trauma or olivocochlear bundle stimulation. A model system with two excitatory influences, one sharply tuned and highly sensitive, and a second, broadly tuned and relatively insensitive, can account for much of the existing data. Results from single-neuron marking studies support the notion that these two influences probably involve interactions between inner and outer hair cells. More global influences such as the endocochlear potential also can act on auditory-nerve fibers through the hair-cell systems. Thus, the inherent frequency selectivity of the receptor cell is only one of many factors that determine the tuning of mammalian auditory-nerve fibers.

[1]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. I. Threshold shift and characteristic-frequency shift , 1984, Hearing Research.

[2]  J. Zwislocki How OHC lesions can lead to neural cochlear hypersensitivity. , 1984, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[3]  G. Békésy,et al.  Experiments in Hearing , 1963 .

[4]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  DIRECTIONAL SENSITIVITY OF INDIVIDUAL VERTEBRATE HAIR CELLS TO CONTROLLED DEFLECTION OF THEIR HAIR BUNDLES * , 1981, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[5]  M. Charles Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. II. Stereocilia damage and alterations of spontaneous discharge rates , 1984, Hearing Research.

[6]  Edwin C. Moxon,et al.  Physiological Considerations in Artificial Stimulation of the Inner Ear , 1972, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[7]  Craig C. Bader,et al.  Evoked mechanical responses of isolated cochlear outer hair cells. , 1985, Science.

[8]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-nerve activity in cats with normal and abnormal cochleas. In: Sensorineural hearing loss. , 1970, Ciba Foundation symposium.

[9]  A. Nuttall,et al.  Efferent control of cochlear inner hair cell responses in the guinea‐pig. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[10]  A J Hudspeth,et al.  Extracellular current flow and the site of transduction by vertebrate hair cells , 1982, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[11]  R. Kimura,et al.  Hairs of the cochlear sensory cells and their attachment to the tectorial membrane. , 1966, Acta oto-laryngologica.

[12]  William F. Sewell,et al.  Furosemide selectively reduces one component in rate-level functions from auditory-nerve fibers , 1984, Hearing Research.

[13]  N. Kiang,et al.  Tails of tuning curves of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1973, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  J. Guinan,et al.  Differential olivocochlear projections from lateral versus medial zones of the superior olivary complex , 1983, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[15]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves , 1984, Hearing Research.

[16]  D. H. Johnson,et al.  The relationship between spike rate and synchrony in responses of auditory-nerve fibers to single tones. , 1980, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  I. Tasaki,et al.  Stria vascularis as source of endocochlear potential. , 1959, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  William F. Sewell,et al.  The effects of furosemide on the endocochlear potential and auditory-nerve fiber tuning curves in cats , 1984, Hearing Research.

[19]  P Dallos,et al.  Production of cochlear potentials by inner and outer hair cells. , 1976, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  A. Dancer,et al.  Intracochlear sound pressure measurements in guinea pigs , 1980, Hearing Research.

[21]  W. F. Sewell,et al.  The relation between the endocochlear potential and spontaneous activity in auditory nerve fibres of the cat. , 1984, The Journal of physiology.

[22]  T. Hoshino Attachment of the inner sensory cell hairs to the tectorial membrane. A scanning electron microscopic study. , 1976, ORL; journal for oto-rhino-laryngology and its related specialties.

[23]  J. Guinan,et al.  Effects of crossed-olivocochlear-bundle stimulation on cat auditory nerve fiber responses to tones. , 1983, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[24]  S M Khanna,et al.  Basilar membrane tuning in the cat cochlea. , 1982, Science.

[25]  P M Sellick,et al.  Low‐frequency characteristics of intracellularly recorded receptor potentials in guinea‐pig cochlear hair cells. , 1983, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  B. M. Johnstone,et al.  The alteration of the vibration of the basilar membrane produced by loud sound , 1984, Hearing Research.

[27]  P M Sellick,et al.  Intracellular studies of hair cells in the mammalian cochlea. , 1978, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. IV. Stereocilia damage and alterations in rate- and phase-level functions , 1984, Hearing Research.

[29]  M. Liberman Single-neuron labeling in the cat auditory nerve. , 1982, Science.

[30]  M. Liberman,et al.  Applications of neuronal labeling techniques to the study of the peripheral auditory system. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[31]  P Dallos,et al.  Response characteristics of mammalian cochlear hair cells , 1985, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.