When words collide: Bayesian meta-analyses of distractor and target properties in the picture–word interference paradigm

In the picture-word interference paradigm, participants name pictures while ignoring a written or spoken distractor word. Naming times to the pictures are slowed down by the presence of the distractor word. The present study investigates in detail the impact of distractor and target word properties on picture naming times, building on the seminal study by Miozzo and Caramazza (2003) "When more is less: A counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General." We report the results of several Bayesian meta-analyses, based on 26 datasets. These analyses provide estimates of effect sizes and their precision for several variables and their interactions. They show the reliability of the distractor frequency effect on picture naming latencies (latencies decrease as the frequency of the distractor increases) and demonstrate for the first time the impact of distractor length, with longer naming latencies for trials with longer distractors. Moreover, distractor frequency interacts with target word frequency to predict picture naming latencies. The methodological and theoretical implications of these findings are discussed.

[1]  A. Bürki,et al.  Picture-word interference in language production studies: Exploring the roles of attention and processing times. , 2022, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  M. Betancourt,et al.  Workflow techniques for the robust use of bayes factors. , 2022, Psychological methods.

[3]  Shravan Vasishth,et al.  What did we learn from forty years of research on semantic interference? A Bayesian meta-analysis , 2020 .

[4]  F. Alario,et al.  Representation and selection of determiners with phonological variants. , 2019, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[5]  Hanna S. Gauvin,et al.  No lexical competition without priming: Evidence from the picture–word interference paradigm , 2018 .

[6]  Boris New,et al.  MEGALEX: A megastudy of visual and auditory word recognition , 2017, Behavior Research Methods.

[7]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  A unified computational account of cumulative semantic, semantic blocking, and semantic distractor effects in picture naming , 2018, Cognition.

[8]  Paul-Christian Bürkner,et al.  Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms , 2017, R J..

[9]  A. Bürki.  Differences in processing times for distractors and pictures modulate the influence of distractors in picture–word interference tasks , 2017 .

[10]  Michele T. Diaz,et al.  Neural evidence for phonologically based language production deficits in older adults: An fMRI investigation of age‐related differences in picture‐word interference , 2017, Brain and behavior.

[11]  Robert J. Hartsuiker,et al.  On the automaticity of language processing. , 2017 .

[12]  Derek Besner,et al.  Thinking outside the box when reading aloud: Between (localist) module connection strength as a source of word frequency effects. , 2016, Psychological review.

[13]  M. Kronbichler,et al.  Words in Context: The Effects of Length, Frequency, and Predictability on Brain Responses During Natural Reading , 2016, Cerebral cortex.

[14]  Michaël A. Stevens,et al.  The impact of word prevalence on lexical decision times: Evidence from the Dutch Lexicon Project 2. , 2016, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[15]  Phillip M. Alday,et al.  A common misapplication of statistical inference: Nuisance control with null-hypothesis significance tests , 2016, Brain and Language.

[16]  L. Abrams,et al.  Competing influences of emotion and phonology during picture-word interference , 2015 .

[17]  K. Rastle,et al.  Lexical frequency effects on articulation: a comparison of picture naming and reading aloud , 2015, Front. Psychol..

[18]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Early and Late Electrophysiological Effects of Distractor Frequency in Picture Naming: Reconciling Input and Output Accounts , 2015, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[19]  Francesca Peressotti,et al.  Distributional analyses in the picture–word interference paradigm: Exploring the semantic interference and the distractor frequency effects , 2015, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[20]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Selective inhibition and naming performance in semantic blocking, picture-word interference, and color-word Stroop tasks. , 2015, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Suzanne R. Jongman,et al.  Sustained attention in language production : An individual differences investigation , 2015 .

[22]  M. Damian,et al.  Processing different kinds of semantic relations in picture-word interference with non-masked and masked distractors , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[23]  Jeremy Goslin,et al.  PhonItalia: a phonological lexicon for Italian , 2014, Behavior research methods.

[24]  G. D. de Zubicaray,et al.  The roles of shared vs. distinctive conceptual features in lexical access , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[25]  James Hutson,et al.  Semantic gradients in picture-word interference tasks: is the size of interference effects affected by the degree of semantic overlap? , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[26]  N. Janssen,et al.  Relative speed of processing affects interference in Stroop and picture–word interference paradigms: evidence from the distractor frequency effect , 2014 .

[27]  J. Barton,et al.  The word-length effect in reading: A review , 2014, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[28]  D. Bates,et al.  Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4 , 2014, 1406.5823.

[29]  M. Lee,et al.  Bayesian Cognitive Modeling: A Practical Course , 2014 .

[30]  S. Piantadosi.  Zipf’s word frequency law in natural language: A critical review and future directions , 2014, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.

[31]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Distinct Patterns of Brain Activity Characterise Lexical Activation and Competition in Spoken Word Production , 2014, PloS one.

[32]  M. Laganaro,et al.  Inter-subject variability modulates phonological advance planning in the production of adjective-noun phrases , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[33]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Subtlex-UK: A New and Improved Word Frequency Database for British English , 2014, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[34]  Robert Davies,et al.  Semantic domain and grammatical class effects in the picture–word interference paradigm , 2014 .

[35]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[36]  E. Navarrete,et al.  About the locus of the distractor frequency effect: Evidence from the production of clitic pronouns , 2013 .

[37]  A. Postma,et al.  To what extent do we process the nondominant object in a morphed figure? Evidence from a picture–word interference task , 2013 .

[38]  Rinus G. Verdonschot,et al.  Time course analysis of the effects of distractor frequency and categorical relatedness in picture naming: An evaluation of the response exclusion account , 2013 .

[39]  Karl E. Peace,et al.  Applied Meta-Analysis with R , 2013 .

[40]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  A late locus of the distractor frequency effect in picture–word interference: Evidence from event-related potentials , 2013, Brain and Language.

[41]  Katie L McMahon,et al.  Differential processing of thematic and categorical conceptual relations in spoken word production. , 2013, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[42]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Independent Distractor Frequency and Age-of-Acquisition Effects in Picture–Word Interference: fMRI Evidence for Post-lexical and Lexical Accounts according to Distractor Type , 2012, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[43]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Distractor strength and selective attention in picture-naming performance , 2011, Memory & cognition.

[44]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-ESP: Spanish word frequencies based on film subtitles , 2011 .

[45]  Herbert Schriefers,et al.  Semantic interference in immediate and delayed naming and reading: Attention and task decisions , 2011 .

[46]  Frank Oppermann,et al.  Is there semantic interference in delayed naming? , 2011, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[47]  Robert J Hartsuiker,et al.  The distractor frequency effect in a delayed picture-word interference task: further evidence for a late locus of distractor exclusion , 2011, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[48]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  Assessing the Usefulness of Google Books’ Word Frequencies for Psycholinguistic Research on Word Processing , 2011, Front. Psychology.

[49]  A. Jacobs,et al.  The word frequency effect: a review of recent developments and implications for the choice of frequency estimates in German. , 2011, Experimental psychology.

[50]  H. Branigan,et al.  Determiner selection in romance languages: evidence from French. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[51]  Rasha Abdel Rahman,et al.  Now you see it … and now again: Semantic interference reflects lexical competition in speech production with and without articulation , 2010, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[52]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  SUBTLEX-NL: A new measure for Dutch word frequency based on film subtitles , 2010, Behavior research methods.

[53]  R. Hartsuiker,et al.  The distractor frequency effect in picture-word interference: Evidence for response exclusion. , 2010, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[54]  Robert A. Johnston,et al.  Age of Acquisition, Word Frequency, and Picture–Word Interference , 2010, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[55]  J. Hair.  Multivariate data analysis : a global perspective , 2010 .

[56]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Moving beyond Kučera and Francis: A critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English , 2009, Behavior research methods.

[57]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Orthographic and phonological effects in the picture–word interference paradigm: Evidence from a logographic language , 2009, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[58]  P. J. Brooks,et al.  Exploring the time course of semantic interference and associative priming in the picture–word interference task , 2009, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[59]  D. Balota,et al.  Moving beyond Coltheart’s N: A new measure of orthographic similarity , 2008, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[60]  A. Roelofs.  Tracing attention and the activation flow of spoken word planning using eye movements. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[61]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[62]  M. Brysbaert,et al.  The use of film subtitles to estimate word frequencies , 2007, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[63]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  The English Lexicon Project , 2007, Behavior research methods.

[64]  J. Ziegler,et al.  Automatic activation of phonology in silent reading is parallel: evidence from beginning and skilled readers. , 2007, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[65]  Bradford Z. Mahon,et al.  Lexical selection is not by competition: a reinterpretation of semantic interference and facilitation effects in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[66]  Cristina Burani,et al.  What causes the effect of age of acquisition in lexical processing? , 2007, Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[67]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Automaticity and control in Language Processing , 2007 .

[68]  Alfonso Caramazza,et al.  Now You See it, Now you Don't: On Turning Semantic Interference Into Facilitation in a Stroop-Like Task , 2006, Cortex.

[69]  James Jaccard,et al.  Arbitrary metrics in psychology. , 2006, The American psychologist.

[70]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  From Popper to Lakatos: A case for cumulative computational modeling , 2005 .

[71]  Marc Brysbaert,et al.  Lexique 2 : A new French lexical database , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[72]  Juan Segui,et al.  Predictors of picture naming speed , 2004, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[73]  A. Caramazza,et al.  When more is less: a counterintuitive effect of distractor frequency in the picture-word interference paradigm. , 2003, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[74]  Markus F Damian,et al.  Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks , 2003, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[75]  A. Roelofs,et al.  Goal-referenced selection of verbal action: modeling attentional control in the Stroop task. , 2003, Psychological review.

[76]  Katie L. McMahon,et al.  Orthographic/Phonological Facilitation of Naming Responses in the Picture–Word Task: An Event-Related fMRI Study Using Overt Vocal Responding , 2002, NeuroImage.

[77]  Arturo E. Hernandez,et al.  Age of acquisition and word frequency: Determinants of object-naming speed and accuracy , 2002, Memory & cognition.

[78]  Patrick Bonin,et al.  The determinants of spoken and written picture naming latencies. , 2002, British journal of psychology.

[79]  J. S. Burt.  Why do non-color words interfere with color naming? , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[80]  Ardi Roelofs,et al.  Set size and repetition matter: comment on Caramazza and Costa (2000) , 2001, Cognition.

[81]  A. Caramazza,et al.  Set size and repetitions are not at the base of the differential effects of semantically related distractors: implications for models of lexical access , 2001 .

[82]  K R Abrams,et al.  Bayesian methods in meta-analysis and evidence synthesis. , 2001, Statistical methods in medical research.

[83]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[84]  Albert Costa,et al.  The semantic interference effect in the picture-word interference paradigm: does the response set matter? , 2000, Cognition.

[85]  M Brysbaert,et al.  Age-of-acquisition effects in semantic processing tasks. , 2000, Acta psychologica.

[86]  F Cuetos,et al.  Naming times for the Snodgrass and Vanderwart pictures in Spanish , 1999, Behavior research methods, instruments, & computers : a journal of the Psychonomic Society, Inc.

[87]  Randi C. Martin,et al.  Semantic and phonological codes interact in single word production. , 1999, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[88]  Thomas H. Carr,et al.  How does weaver pay attention? , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[89]  Catriona M. Morrison,et al.  Real age-of-acquisition effects in lexical retrieval. , 1998, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[90]  S. Andrews.  The effect of orthographic similarity on lexical retrieval: Resolving neighborhood conflicts , 1997 .

[91]  Christopher Barry,et al.  Naming the Snodgrass and Vanderwart Pictures: Effects of Age of Acquisition, Frequency, and Name Agreement , 1997 .

[92]  Willem J. M. Levelt,et al.  A theory of lexical access in speech production , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[93]  A. Meyer.  Lexical Access in Phrase and Sentence Production: Results from Picture–Word Interference Experiments , 1996 .

[94]  P. Starreveld,et al.  Time-course analysis of semantic and orthographic context effects in picture naming. , 1996 .

[95]  J Grainger,et al.  Orthographic processing in visual word recognition: a multiple read-out model. , 1996, Psychological review.

[96]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  ROLES OF WORD FREQUENCY AND AGE OF ACQUISITION IN WORD NAMING AND LEXICAL DECISION , 1995 .

[97]  J. S. Burt.  Identity Primes Produce Facilitation in a Colour Naming Task , 1994 .

[98]  W. Levelt,et al.  Word frequency effects in speech production: Retrieval of syntactic information and of phonological form , 1994 .

[99]  A. Roelofs,et al.  A spreading-activation theory of lemma retrieval in speaking , 1992, Cognition.

[100]  J. Stroop.  Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. , 1992 .

[101]  W. Heij,et al.  Categorical interference and associative priming in picture naming. , 1990 .

[102]  Antje S. Meyer,et al.  Exploring the time course of lexical access in language production : Picture word interference studies , 1990 .

[103]  Veronika Coltheart,et al.  Effects of word imageability and age of acquisition on children's reading , 1988 .

[104]  Gordon D. A. Brown,et al.  First in, first out: Word learning age and spoken word frequency as predictors of word familiarity and word naming latency , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[105]  D. Balota,et al.  A word’s meaning affects the decision in lexical decision , 1984, Memory & cognition.

[106]  W. Glaser,et al.  The time course of picture-word interference. , 1984, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[107]  P. Briggs,et al.  The development of word recognition processes. , 1984, British journal of psychology.

[108]  P. Briggs,et al.  Phonological coding in good and poor readers. , 1982, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[109]  James L. McClelland,et al.  An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. , 1981 .

[110]  A. Cutler.  Making up materials is a confounded nuisance, or: Will we able to run any psycholinguistic experiments at all in 1990? , 1981, Cognition.

[111]  C. Schiepers,et al.  Response latency and accuracy in visual word recogniton , 1980, Perception & psychophysics.

[112]  Stephen J. Lupker,et al.  The semantic nature of response competition in the picture-word interference task , 1979 .

[113]  K Rayner,et al.  Stages of processing in word identification. , 1978, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[114]  K. Rayner,et al.  Visual-feature and response components in a picture-word interference task with beginning and skilled readers. , 1977, Journal of experimental child psychology.

[115]  Charles H. Bennett,et al.  Efficient estimation of free energy differences from Monte Carlo data , 1976 .

[116]  J. Frederiksen,et al.  Spelling and sound: Approaches to the internal lexicon. , 1976 .

[117]  K. Forster,et al.  Lexical Access and Naming Time. , 1973 .

[118]  James T. Townsend,et al.  A note on the identifiability of parallel and serial processes , 1971 .

[119]  A Wingfield,et al.  Response Latencies in Naming Objects , 1965, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology.

[120]  G. Āllport.  The Psycho-Biology of Language. , 1936 .

[121]  L. M. M.-T..  Theory of Probability , 1929, Nature.