An efficient method for PET image denoising by combining multi-scale transform and non-local means

The diagnosis of dementia, particularly in the early stages is very much helpful with Positron emission tomography (PET) image processing. The most important challenges in PET image processing are noise removal and region of interests (ROIs) segmentation. Although denoising and segmentation are performed independently, but the performance of the denoising process significantly affects the performance of the segmentation process. Due to the low signals to noise ratio and low contrast, PET image denoising is a challenging task. Individual wavelet, curvelet and non-local means (NLM) based methods are not well suited to handle both isotropic (smooth details) and anisotropic (edges and curves) features due to its restricted abilities. To address these issues, the present work proposes an efficient denoising framework for reducing the noise level of brain PET images based on the combination of multi-scale transform (wavelet and curvelet) and tree clustering non-local means (TNLM). The main objective of the proposed method is to extract the isotropic features from a noisy smooth PET image using tree clustering based non-local means (TNLM). Then curvelet-based denoising is applied to the residual image to extract the anisotropic features such as edges and curves. Finally, the extracted anisotropic features are inserted back into the isotropic features to obtain an estimated denoised image. Simulated phantom and clinical PET datasets have been used in this proposed work for testing and measuring the performance in the medical applications, such as gray matter segmentation and precise tumor region identification without any interaction with other structural images like MRI or CT. The results in the experimental section show that the proposed denoising method has obtained better performance than existing wavelet, curvelet, wavelet-curvelet, non-local means (NLM) and deep learning methods based on the preservation of the edges. Qualitatively, a notable gain is achieved in the proposed denoised PET images in terms of contrast enhancement than other existing denoising methods.

[1]  Jiahe Tian,et al.  PET image denoising using unsupervised deep learning , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  Michael B. Wakin Sparse Image and Signal Processing: Wavelets, Curvelets, Morphological Diversity (Starck, J.-L., et al; 2010) [Book Reviews] , 2011, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine.

[3]  Shadi AlZu'bi,et al.  Multiresolution Analysis Using Wavelet, Ridgelet, and Curvelet Transforms for Medical Image Segmentation , 2011, Int. J. Biomed. Imaging.

[4]  Osslan Osiris Vergara-Villegas,et al.  Noise Reduction in Small-Animal PET Images Using a Multiresolution Transform , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  David L. Donoho,et al.  De-noising by soft-thresholding , 1995, IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory.

[6]  Azeddine Beghdadi,et al.  Contrast enhancement technique based on local detection of edges , 1989, Comput. Vis. Graph. Image Process..

[7]  Abhishek Bal,et al.  MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation and Analysis using Rough-Fuzzy C-Means and Shape Based Properties , 2018, J. King Saud Univ. Comput. Inf. Sci..

[8]  Sankar K. Pal,et al.  Rough-Fuzzy Pattern Recognition: Applications in Bioinformatics and Medical Imaging , 2012 .

[9]  Carl Taswell,et al.  The what, how, and why of wavelet shrinkage denoising , 2000, Comput. Sci. Eng..

[10]  Chih-Chieh Liu,et al.  PET Image Denoising Using a Deep Neural Network Through Fine Tuning , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[11]  Abhishek Bal,et al.  An efficient wavelet and curvelet-based PET image denoising technique , 2019, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[12]  Jyh-Cheng Chen,et al.  Development of wavelet de-noising technique for PET images. , 2005, Computerized medical imaging and graphics : the official journal of the Computerized Medical Imaging Society.

[13]  Guobao Wang,et al.  PET Image Reconstruction Using Kernel Method , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[14]  H. B. Kekre,et al.  Texture Based Segmentation using Statistical Properties for Mammographic Images , 2010 .

[15]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  A theoretical study of the contrast recovery and variance of MAP reconstructions from PET data , 1999, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[16]  Daniel Cremers,et al.  Efficient Nonlocal Means for Denoising of Textural Patterns , 2008, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[17]  Dimitris Visvikis,et al.  Denoising of PET images by combining wavelets and curvelets for improved preservation of resolution and quantitation , 2013, Medical Image Anal..

[18]  Andrew J. Reader,et al.  Multitracer Guided PET Image Reconstruction , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Radiation and Plasma Medical Sciences.

[19]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Non-Local Means Denoising of Dynamic PET Images , 2013, PloS one.

[20]  B. Silverman,et al.  Incorporating Information on Neighboring Coefficients Into Wavelet Estimation , 2001 .

[21]  F E Turkheimer,et al.  Modeling Dynamic PET-SPECT Studies in the Wavelet Domain , 2000, Journal of cerebral blood flow and metabolism : official journal of the International Society of Cerebral Blood Flow and Metabolism.

[22]  Carlos Huerga,et al.  Denoising of PET images by context modelling using local neighbourhood correlation , 2017, Physics in medicine and biology.

[23]  Jos B. T. M. Roerdink,et al.  Denoising functional MR images: a comparison of wavelet denoising and Gaussian smoothing , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[24]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Bayesian Non-local Means Filter, Image Redundancy and Adaptive Dictionaries for Noise Removal , 2007, SSVM.

[25]  Laurent Demanet,et al.  Fast Discrete Curvelet Transforms , 2006, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[26]  Ulas Bagci,et al.  Segmentation Based Denoising of PET Images: An Iterative Approach via Regional Means and Affinity Propagation , 2014, MICCAI.

[27]  P. Madsen,et al.  The monopulsed nature of sperm whale clicks. , 2003, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  V. K. Govindan,et al.  Nonlocal-Means Image Denoising Technique Using Robust M-Estimator , 2010, Journal of Computer Science and Technology.

[29]  Xiangyang Wang,et al.  LS-SVM based image segmentation using color and texture information , 2012, J. Vis. Commun. Image Represent..

[30]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Improved quantitation for PET/CT image reconstruction with system modeling and anatomical priors , 2005, SPIE Medical Imaging.

[31]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[32]  Hamid Soltanian-Zadeh,et al.  Assessment of the Wavelet Transform in Reduction of Noise from Simulated PET Images , 2009, Journal of Nuclear Medicine Technology.

[33]  Emmanuel J. Candès,et al.  The curvelet transform for image denoising , 2002, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[34]  Abhishek Bal,et al.  Brain Tumor Segmentation on MR Image Using K-Means and Fuzzy-Possibilistic Clustering , 2018, 2018 2nd International Conference on Electronics, Materials Engineering & Nano-Technology (IEMENTech).

[35]  T. D. Bui,et al.  Image denoising using neighbouring wavelet coefficients , 2004, 2004 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing.

[36]  S. Arumuga Perumal,et al.  Image De-noising using Discrete Wavelet transform , 2008 .

[37]  D. L. Donoho,et al.  Ideal spacial adaptation via wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[38]  S Ali Hyder,et al.  An efficient algorithm for denoising MR and CT images using digital curvelet transform. , 2011, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[39]  Abhishek Bal,et al.  Gray Matter Segmentation and Delineation from Positron Emission Tomography (PET) Image , 2020 .

[40]  Guillermo Sapiro,et al.  Fast image and video denoising via nonlocal means of similar neighborhoods , 2005, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[41]  I. Johnstone,et al.  Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage , 1994 .

[42]  Jeff Kershaw,et al.  PET kinetic analysis: wavelet denoising of dynamic PET data with application to parametric imaging , 2007, Annals of nuclear medicine.

[43]  Thierry Blu,et al.  A New SURE Approach to Image Denoising: Interscale Orthonormal Wavelet Thresholding , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Image Processing.

[44]  E. Candès,et al.  New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise C2 singularities , 2004 .

[45]  Charles A Mistretta,et al.  Dynamic PET Denoising with HYPR Processing , 2010, Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[46]  Hari Om,et al.  An Improved Image Denoising Method Based on Wavelet Thresholding , 2012 .

[47]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Spatially adaptive wavelet thresholding with context modeling for image denoising , 1998, Proceedings 1998 International Conference on Image Processing. ICIP98 (Cat. No.98CB36269).

[48]  Martin Vetterli,et al.  Adaptive wavelet thresholding for image denoising and compression , 2000, IEEE Trans. Image Process..

[49]  Van-Giang Nguyen,et al.  Nonlocal-means approaches to anatomy-based PET image reconstruction , 2010, IEEE Nuclear Science Symposuim & Medical Imaging Conference.

[50]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A Review of Image Denoising Algorithms, with a New One , 2005, Multiscale Model. Simul..

[51]  Sebti Foufou,et al.  Multispectral image denoising with optimized vector non-local mean filter , 2016, Digit. Signal Process..

[52]  Jean-Michel Morel,et al.  A non-local algorithm for image denoising , 2005, 2005 IEEE Computer Society Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR'05).