Necessary and Sufficient Bit Rate Conditions to Stabilize a Scalar Continuous-Time LTI System Based on Event Triggering

This paper considers a scalar continuous-time linear time-invariant system, whose feedback signal is transmitted through a communication network. Such a network has only finite bit rate and suffers from transmission delay which is characterized by both lower and upper delay bounds. The concerned system implements event-triggering strategies, i.e., only when certain events are triggered, the system samples and transmits feedback signals. This paper first derives some lower bounds on the feedback bit rate required to achieve the input-to-state stability under arbitrary event-triggering strategies. Then this paper proposes some constructive methods to design the event-triggering strategy and the controller, and can achieve the input-to-state stability at a bit rate being arbitrarily close to these obtained lower bit rate bounds. Moreover, this paper proves that the stabilizing bit rates under the proposed event-triggering strategies can be strictly lower than the stabilizing bit rate required by any time-triggering strategy. This bit rate superiority comes from the fact that under event triggering, the state information can be freely extracted from the receive time instants of feedback packets without consuming any bit rate. Simulations are done to demonstrate the bit rate superiority of the proposed event-triggering strategies.

[1]  Eduardo Sontag,et al.  New characterizations of input-to-state stability , 1996, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[2]  Nicola Elia,et al.  Stabilization of linear systems with limited information , 2001, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[3]  J.H. Braslavsky,et al.  Level Crossing Sampling in Feedback Stabilization under Data-Rate Constraints , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  Sekhar Tatikonda,et al.  Control under communication constraints , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[5]  Qiang Ling Periodic Event-Triggered Quantization Policy Design for a Scalar LTI System With i.i.d. Feedback Dropouts , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[6]  Robin J. Evans,et al.  Feedback Control Under Data Rate Constraints: An Overview , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[7]  Daniel Liberzon,et al.  Quantized feedback stabilization of linear systems , 2000, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[8]  Eloy García,et al.  Model-Based Event-Triggered Control for Systems With Quantization and Time-Varying Network Delays , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[9]  Xiaofeng Wang,et al.  Stabilizing bit-rates in networked control systems with decentralized event-triggered communication , 2014, Discret. Event Dyn. Syst..

[10]  Jorge Cortés,et al.  Event-Triggered Stabilization of Linear Systems Under Bounded Bit Rates , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[11]  João P. Hespanha,et al.  Control With Minimal Cost-Per-Symbol Encoding and Quasi-Optimality of Event-Based Encoders , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[12]  Xiaofeng Wang,et al.  Stabilizing bit-rates in quantized event triggered control systems , 2012, HSCC '12.

[13]  K. Åström,et al.  Comparison of Riemann and Lebesgue sampling for first order stochastic systems , 2002, Proceedings of the 41st IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, 2002..

[14]  J. Hespanha,et al.  Towards the Control of Linear Systems with Minimum Bit-Rate , 2002 .

[15]  João Pedro Hespanha,et al.  A Survey of Recent Results in Networked Control Systems , 2007, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[16]  W. P. M. H. Heemels,et al.  Model-based periodic event-triggered control for linear systems , 2013, Autom..

[17]  Sophie Tarbouriech,et al.  Observer-based event-triggered control in the presence of cone-bounded nonlinear inputs , 2019, Nonlinear Analysis: Hybrid Systems.

[18]  Giuseppe Di Battista,et al.  26 Computer Networks , 2004 .

[19]  J. Cortés,et al.  The Value of Timing Information in Event-Triggered Control , 2020, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[20]  Qiang Ling,et al.  Bit Rate Conditions to Stabilize a Continuous-Time Scalar Linear System Based on Event Triggering , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[21]  Paulo Tabuada,et al.  Event-Triggered Real-Time Scheduling of Stabilizing Control Tasks , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[22]  Massimo Franceschetti,et al.  The value of timing information in event-triggered control: The scalar case , 2016, 2016 54th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton).

[23]  J. Lunze,et al.  Event-based control using quantized state information , 2010 .