Research Paper: Systematically Assessing the Situational Relevance of Electronic Knowledge Resources: A Mixed Methods Study

UNLABELLED Electronic Knowledge Resources (EKRs) are increasingly used by physicians, but their situational relevance has not been systematically examined. OBJECTIVE Systematically scrutinize the situational relevance of EKR-derived information items in and outside clinical settings. BACKGROUND Physicians use EKRs to accomplish four cognitive objectives (C1-4), and three organizational objectives (O1-3): (C1) Answer questions/solve problems/support decision-making in a clinical context; (C2) fulfill educational-research objectives; (C3) search for personal interest or curiosity; (C4) overcome limits of human memory; (O1) share information with patients, families, or caregivers; (O2) exchange information with other health professionals; (O3) plan-manage-monitor tasks with other health professionals. METHODS Longitudinal mixed methods multiple case study: Cases were 17 residents' critical searches for information, using a commercial EKR, during a 2-month block of family practice. Usage data were automatically recorded. Each "opened" item of information was linked to an impact assessment questionnaire, and 1,981 evaluations of items were documented. Interviews with residents were guided by log files, which tracked use and impact of EKR-derived information items. Thematic analysis identified 156 critical searches linked to 877 information items. For each case, qualitative data were assigned to one of the seven proposed objectives. RESULTS Residents achieved their search objectives in 85.9% of cases (situational relevance). Additional sources of information were sought in 52.6% of cases. Results support the seven proposed objectives, levels of comparative relevance (less, equally, more), and levels of stimulation of learning and knowledge (individual, organizational). CONCLUSION Our method of systematic assessment may contribute to user-based evaluation of EKRs.

[1]  Jochen R. Moehr,et al.  Terminological Problems in Information Retrieval , 2003, Journal of Medical Systems.

[2]  A. Stone,et al.  The science of self-report. Implications for research and practice , 1999 .

[3]  David W. Bates,et al.  Research Paper: Clinician Use of a Palmtop Drug Reference Guide , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[4]  Saul Shiffman,et al.  Real-time self-report of momentary states in the natural environment: Computerized ecological momentary assessment. , 2000 .

[5]  H. C. Coumou,et al.  How do primary care physicians seek answers to clinical questions? A literature review. , 2006, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[6]  Linda A. Watson,et al.  Information Retrieval: A Health and Biomedical Perspective. , 2005 .

[7]  C. Teddlie,et al.  SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research , 2010 .

[8]  K. Schwartz,et al.  Use of on-line evidence-based resources at the point of care. , 2003, Family medicine.

[9]  D. Boos On Generalized Score Tests , 1992 .

[10]  W. Pan,et al.  Small‐sample performance of the robust score test and its modifications in generalized estimating equations , 2005, Statistics in medicine.

[11]  P. Pluye,et al.  How information retrieval technology may impact on physician practice: an organizational case study in family medicine. , 2004, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[12]  Joan C. Bartlett,et al.  Seven reasons why health professionals search clinical information-retrieval technology (CIRT): toward an organizational model. , 2007, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[13]  R. Cullen,et al.  In search of evidence: family practitioners' use of the Internet for clinical information. , 2002, Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA.

[14]  Michael L. Parchman,et al.  Research Paper: Handheld Computer Use in U.S. Family Practice Residency Programs , 2002, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[15]  Roland M. Grad,et al.  Impact of clinical information-retrieval technology on physicians: A literature review of quantitative, qualitative and mixed methods studies , 2005, Int. J. Medical Informatics.

[16]  Paul N. Gorman,et al.  Finding the answers in primary care: Information seeking by rural and nonrural clinicians , 2004, MedInfo.

[17]  Norris Te,et al.  Family practice residency programs: agents for positive social change? , 1998 .

[18]  J. C. Flanagan Psychological Bulletin THE CRITICAL INCIDENT TECHNIQUE , 2022 .

[19]  Robyn Tamblyn,et al.  Assessing the impact of clinical information-retrieval technology in a family practice residency. , 2005, Journal of evaluation in clinical practice.

[20]  Johanna I. Westbrook,et al.  Research Paper: Do clinicians use online evidence to support patient care? a study of 55, 000 clinicians , 2003, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..