Exterior Differential Systems in Control and Robotics

The vast majority of the mathematically oriented literature in the areas of robotics and control has been heavily influenced by a differential geometric point of view. For nonlinear systems in particular, most of the research has concentrated on the analysis of the Lie algebras associated with controllability, reachability and observability. In recent years, however, a small but influential trend has begun in the literature on the use of other methods, such as differential algebra [9, 8, 10] and exterior differential systems [13, 11] for the analysis of nonlinear control systems and nonlinear implicit systems. In this paper we survey some key results from the theory of exterior differential systems and their application to current and challenging problems in robotics and control.

[1]  J. Munkres,et al.  Calculus on Manifolds , 1965 .

[2]  M. Spivak A comprehensive introduction to differential geometry , 1979 .

[3]  Alberto Isidori,et al.  Partial and robust linearization by feedback , 1983, The 22nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  R. Abraham,et al.  Manifolds, Tensor Analysis, and Applications , 1983 .

[5]  A. Isidori Nonlinear Control Systems , 1985 .

[6]  R. Marino On the largest feedback linearizable subsystem , 1986 .

[7]  Arjan van der Schaft,et al.  Non-linear dynamical control systems , 1990 .

[8]  S. Chern,et al.  Exterior Differential Systems , 1990 .

[9]  Claude Samson,et al.  Velocity and torque feedback control of a nonholonomic cart , 1991 .

[10]  J. Lévine,et al.  Sufficient conditions for dynamic state feedback linearization , 1991 .

[11]  J. Munkres Analysis On Manifolds , 1991 .

[12]  P. Kokotovic,et al.  Nonlinear control via approximate input-output linearization: the ball and beam example , 1992 .

[13]  R. Gardner,et al.  The GS algorithm for exact linearization to Brunovsky normal form , 1992 .

[14]  M. Fliess,et al.  Sur les systèmes non linéaires différentiellement plats , 1992 .

[15]  S. Sastry,et al.  Extended Goursat normal forms with applications to nonholonomic motion planning , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[16]  Ole Jakob Sørdalen,et al.  Conversion of the kinematics of a car with n trailers into a chained form , 1993, [1993] Proceedings IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[17]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  A Multi-Steering Trailer System: Conversion into Chained Form Using , 1994 .

[18]  R. Murray,et al.  Applications and extensions of Goursat normal form to control of nonlinear systems , 1993, Proceedings of 32nd IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[19]  S. Sastry,et al.  Exterior differential systems and nonholonomic motion planning , 1994 .

[20]  Richard M. Murray,et al.  Nilpotent bases for a class of nonintegrable distributions with applications to trajectory generation for nonholonomic systems , 1994, Math. Control. Signals Syst..

[21]  M. Fliess,et al.  Flatness and defect of non-linear systems: introductory theory and examples , 1995 .

[22]  D. M. Tilbury,et al.  A bound on the number of integrators needed to linearize a control system , 1995, Proceedings of 1995 34th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[23]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  A multisteering trailer system: conversion into chained form using dynamic feedback , 1995, IEEE Trans. Robotics Autom..

[24]  R. Murray,et al.  Trajectory generation for the N-trailer problem using Goursat normal form , 1995 .

[25]  S. Sastry,et al.  The multi‐steering N‐trailer system: A case study of goursat normal forms and prolongations , 1995 .

[26]  S. Shankar Sastry,et al.  Steering Three-Input Nonholonomic Systems: The Fire Truck Example , 1995, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[27]  C. Moog,et al.  A linear algebraic framework for dynamic feedback linearization , 1995, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control..

[28]  R. Murray,et al.  A homotopy algorithm for approximating geometric distributions by integrable systems , 1996 .