Modeling Urban Transportation in the Aftermath of a Nuclear Disaster: The Role of Human Behavioral Responses

This paper describes an integrated modeling environment for a large urban transportation system designed to capture human behaviors in the aftermath of an improvised nuclear device denotation. The integrated environment models the complex interplay of human behavior (under deteriorating health conditions) and infrastructural systems in the aftermath of such a hypothetical crisis. Prior work on this scenario has covered in detail physical and radiological effects of the blast, casualty estimates and impact on health, evacuation strategies, etc. assuming a static population distribution. Relatively few studies have accounted for how people respond to the event and the strong coupling that exists between the various infrastructural systems. This paper highlights the design aspects of the system concerning the transportation and behavior modules and their interactions. The transportation model incorporates dynamic network loading for auto and walk travel modes, group travel, crowd-following, as well as adjustments for ambient traffic to account for network loads caused by external agents. We present a collection of computational experiments offering insight into how different individual and collective behaviors of agents can affect evacuation times, route choices and health effects.

[1]  Xiaoshan Pan,et al.  Computational modeling of human and social behaviors for emergency egress analysis , 2006 .

[2]  Samarth Swarup,et al.  Modeling the Interaction between Emergency Communications and Behavior in the Aftermath of a Disaster , 2013, SBP.

[3]  Claudia V. Goldman,et al.  Decentralized Control of Cooperative Systems: Categorization and Complexity Analysis , 2004, J. Artif. Intell. Res..

[4]  James H Lambert,et al.  Population behavioral scenarios influencing radiological disaster preparedness and planning. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[5]  M. Lindell,et al.  Understanding Citizen Response to Disasters with Implications for Terrorism , 2003 .

[6]  Doina Precup,et al.  Between MDPs and Semi-MDPs: A Framework for Temporal Abstraction in Reinforcement Learning , 1999, Artif. Intell..

[7]  Samarth Swarup,et al.  Modeling human behavior in the aftermath of a hypothetical improvised nuclear detonation , 2013, AAMAS.

[8]  M B Dillon,et al.  Key Response Planning Factors for the Aftermath of Nuclear Terrorism , 2009 .

[9]  Shashi Shekhar,et al.  Contraflow network reconfiguration for evacuation planning: a summary of results , 2005, GIS '05.

[10]  Madhav V. Marathe,et al.  Cascading failures in multiple infrastructures: From transportation to communication network , 2010, 2010 5th International Conference on Critical Infrastructure (CRIS).

[11]  N. Badler,et al.  Crowd simulation incorporating agent psychological models, roles and communication , 2005 .

[12]  Robyn R. M. Gershon,et al.  Modeling pre-evacuation delay by evacuees in World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001 , 2011 .

[13]  C. Barrett,et al.  Label Constrained Shortest Path Algorithms : An Experimental Evaluation using Transportation Networks , 2007 .

[14]  K. Nagel,et al.  Behavioral Calibration and Analysis of a Large-Scale Travel Microsimulation , 2012 .

[15]  M. E. Williams,et al.  TRANSIMS: TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS AND SIMULATION SYSTEM , 1995 .

[16]  Lawrence M Wein,et al.  Analyzing Evacuation Versus Shelter‐in‐Place Strategies After a Terrorist Nuclear Detonation , 2010, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[17]  Balaaji S. P. Subbiah,et al.  Human Initiated Cascading Failures in Societal Infrastructures , 2012, PloS one.

[18]  Michael K Lindell,et al.  The Protective Action Decision Model: Theoretical Modifications and Additional Evidence , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[19]  James H. Lambert,et al.  Understanding and managing disaster evacuation on a transportation network. , 2013, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[20]  Norman I. Badler,et al.  Modeling Crowd and Trained Leader Behavior during Building Evacuation , 2006, IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications.

[21]  T. Drabek,et al.  Families in Disaster: Reactions and Relatives , 1968 .

[22]  Hanif D. Sherali,et al.  Optimal evacuation planning using staging and routing , 2014, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[23]  Paul S Fischbeck,et al.  An Integrated Physical Dispersion and Behavioral Response Model for Risk Assessment of Radiological Dispersion Device (RDD) Events , 2006, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[24]  Pamela Murray-Tuite,et al.  Analysis of child pick-up during daily routines and for daytime no-notice evacuations , 2012 .

[25]  M. D. McKay,et al.  Creating synthetic baseline populations , 1996 .

[26]  Serge P. Hoogendoorn,et al.  A review on travel behaviour modelling in dynamic traffic simulation models for evacuations , 2012 .

[27]  Pamela Murray-Tuite,et al.  Evacuation transportation modeling: An overview of research, development, and practice , 2013 .

[28]  R. Lasker Redefining Readiness: Terrorism Planning Through the Eyes of the Public , 2004 .

[29]  Samarth Swarup,et al.  Planning and response in the aftermath of a large crisis: An agent-based informatics framework , 2013, 2013 Winter Simulations Conference (WSC).

[30]  Abhijin Adiga,et al.  Route Stability in Large-Scale Transportation Models , 2013 .