Scholarly books and their evaluation context in the social sciences and humanities

In recent years we have seen an increase in quantitative as well as qualitative research activity surrounding the book -i.e., edited books, chapters, monographs, textbooks. Still, with many issues related to data access, metadata accuracy, the business of publishing, changes in publishing formats (e.g., open access; electronic publishing) and peer review standards, the evaluation community has more to learn.

[1]  Alesia Zuccalá,et al.  Metric assessments of books as families of works , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[2]  E. Giménez-Toledo,et al.  Evaluation of scientific books’ publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey , 2013 .

[3]  Wolfgang Glänzel,et al.  Opportunities for and limitations of the Book Citation Index , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[4]  Alesia Zuccalá,et al.  Libcitations, worldcat, cultural impact, and fame , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[6]  Juan Miguel Campanario,et al.  Coverage, field specialisation and the impact of scientific publishers indexed in the Book Citation Index , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..

[7]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[8]  E. Giménez-Toledo,et al.  Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: a review and a study towards a model of evaluation , 2009 .

[9]  Maarten van Someren,et al.  A machine‐learning approach to coding book reviews as quality indicators: Toward a theory of megacitation , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[10]  Mike Thelwall,et al.  Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[11]  Daniel Torres-Salinas,et al.  PlumX As a Potential Tool to Assess the Macroscopic Multidimensional Impact of Books , 2017, Front. Res. Metr. Anal..

[12]  Jennifer Thompson,et al.  The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literary Scholarship , 2002 .

[13]  G. Peruginelli,et al.  Research Quality Evaluation: The Case of Legal Studies , 2018 .