Scholarly books and their evaluation context in the social sciences and humanities
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Alesia Zuccalá,et al. Metric assessments of books as families of works , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[2] E. Giménez-Toledo,et al. Evaluation of scientific books’ publishers in social sciences and humanities: Results of a survey , 2013 .
[3] Wolfgang Glänzel,et al. Opportunities for and limitations of the Book Citation Index , 2013, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[4] Alesia Zuccalá,et al. Libcitations, worldcat, cultural impact, and fame , 2018, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[6] Juan Miguel Campanario,et al. Coverage, field specialisation and the impact of scientific publishers indexed in the Book Citation Index , 2013, Online Inf. Rev..
[7] Mike Thelwall,et al. An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi , 2016, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[8] E. Giménez-Toledo,et al. Assessment of humanities and social sciences monographs through their publishers: a review and a study towards a model of evaluation , 2009 .
[9] Maarten van Someren,et al. A machine‐learning approach to coding book reviews as quality indicators: Toward a theory of megacitation , 2014, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[10] Mike Thelwall,et al. Assessing the citation impact of books: The role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus , 2011, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..
[11] Daniel Torres-Salinas,et al. PlumX As a Potential Tool to Assess the Macroscopic Multidimensional Impact of Books , 2017, Front. Res. Metr. Anal..
[12] Jennifer Thompson,et al. The Death of the Scholarly Monograph in the Humanities? Citation Patterns in Literary Scholarship , 2002 .
[13] G. Peruginelli,et al. Research Quality Evaluation: The Case of Legal Studies , 2018 .