A new method for predicting formation lithology while drilling at horizontal well bit

Abstract The identification of lithology while drilling with horizontal well bit is a difficult problem to solve in geosteering. However, due to the existence of “zero length” (the distance between the logging tool and the bit), the lithology at the horizontal well bit cannot be accurately interpreted in real time, which creates a lag in geosteering. Based on logging while drilling (LWD) technology, this paper uses supervised learning in machine learning methods, conventional logging interpretation technology and big data idea in modern computer science, through interdisciplinary theories and methods to research lithology prediction for horizontal well bits in reservoirs. First, a measurement point and vertical reservoir boundary distance (D-MP-VRB) database is built according to different step size categories. Second, based on the D-MP-VRB database, D-MP-VRB prediction models are established using one-versus-one support vector machines (OVO SVMs), random forest (RF), neural networks (NN), and extreme gradient boosting tree (XGBoost) algorithms. To reduce the dimensions of the input data, the feature parameters of the samples are obtained by a correlation analysis of the logging data. The optimal parameter values of each algorithm are determined by grid search and 10-fold cross-validation methods. Finally, the prediction formula of the bit and vertical reservoir boundary distance based on the D-MP-VRB prediction model is established. A case study is performed with data from a sandstone reservoir in Changqing oilfield, Ordos Basin, China. On this basis, the lithology predictions at the bit in real time are carried out by using four models. Considering the principle of model prediction accuracy, through 1320 experiments, only the XGBoost prediction model can be selected, and the step size of the target category is 2 m, however, this model takes the longest time to train. Therefore, the reliable prediction model trained by the sample data of the original training set is used to predict the reservoir information encountered by horizontal well. After the newly drilled reservoir information has accumulated to a certain amount and accurately explained, it is added to the original training set sample data, and the prediction model is retrained to improve the accuracy and adaptability of the model. Based on the prediction results of the XGBoost model and the prediction formula, the distance prediction between the horizontal well bit and the vertical reservoir boundary is realized, real-time lithology correction at the bit is realized, and the adverse effect of the “zero length” on the lithology prediction at the bit is reduced. The research results provide not only a new method for the real-time prediction of lithology in horizontal well bits but also a theoretical basis for the geosteering of oilfield development and valuable information for future research.

[1]  S. Heddam,et al.  Lithofacies prediction in non-cored wells from the Sif Fatima oil field (Berkine basin, southern Algeria): A comparative study of multilayer perceptron neural network and cluster analysis-based approaches , 2020, Journal of African Earth Sciences.

[2]  W. Al-Mudhafar Integrating kernel support vector machines for efficient rock facies classification in the main pay of Zubair formation in South Rumaila oil field, Iraq , 2017 .

[3]  Marcelo Kehl de Souza,et al.  Evaluation of machine learning methods for lithology classification using geophysical data , 2020, Comput. Geosci..

[4]  Li Rong,et al.  Application of Principal Component Analysis and Least Square Support Vector Machine to Lithology Identification , 2009 .

[5]  Hongqi Li,et al.  A new method of identification of complex lithologies and reservoirs: task-driven data mining , 2013 .

[6]  Wang De-ping,et al.  A new identification method for complex lithology with support vector machine , 2007 .

[7]  Randy C. Paffenroth,et al.  Random Forests for mapping and analysis of microkinetics models , 2018, Comput. Chem. Eng..

[8]  Zhizhang Wang,et al.  Lithology identification using kernel Fisher discriminant analysis with well logs , 2016 .

[9]  José Antonio Lozano,et al.  Sensitivity Analysis of k-Fold Cross Validation in Prediction Error Estimation , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[10]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[11]  Watheq J. Al-Mudhafar Integrating kernel support vector machines for efficient rock facies classification in the main pay of Zubair formation in South Rumaila oil field, Iraq , 2017, Modeling Earth Systems and Environment.

[12]  Guoyin Zhang,et al.  Grid density overlapping hierarchical algorithm for clustering of carbonate reservoir rock types: A case from Mishrif Formation of West Qurna-1 oilfield, Iraq , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[13]  Jie Wang,et al.  Comparison of Classification Algorithms and Training Sample Sizes in Urban Land Classification with Landsat Thematic Mapper Imagery , 2014, Remote. Sens..

[14]  Tapan Mukerji,et al.  Seismic Lithofacies Classification From Well Logs Using Statistical Rock Physics , 2002 .

[15]  Qamar Yasin,et al.  An integrated petrophysical and geomechanical characterization of Sembar Shale in the Lower Indus Basin, Pakistan, using well logs and seismic data , 2020, Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering.

[16]  Matthew J. Cracknell,et al.  Geological mapping using remote sensing data: A comparison of five machine learning algorithms, their response to variations in the spatial distribution of training data and the use of explicit spatial information , 2014, Comput. Geosci..

[17]  Q. Du,et al.  Combining classification and regression for improving shear wave velocity estimation from well logs data , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[18]  Hamed Darabi,et al.  A General Spatio-Temporal Clustering-Based Non-local Formulation for Multiscale Modeling of Compartmentalized Reservoirs , 2019, Day 2 Wed, April 24, 2019.

[19]  H. Tang,et al.  Improved Carbonate Reservoir Facies Classification Using Artificial Neural Network Method , 2008 .

[21]  Jian Sun,et al.  Optimization of models for a rapid identification of lithology while drilling - A win-win strategy based on machine learning , 2019, Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering.

[22]  J. Pitcher,et al.  Application of 3D Geosteering Capabilities in Geologically Complex Shale , 2012 .

[23]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Bagging Predictors , 1996, Machine Learning.

[24]  W. Al-Mudhafar Incorporation of Bootstrapping and Cross-Validation for Efficient Multivariate Facies and Petrophysical Modeling , 2016 .

[25]  Jason L. Pitcher,et al.  Advances in Geosteering Technology: From Simple to Complex Solutions , 2010 .

[26]  Heping Pan,et al.  Capability of self-organizing map neural network in geophysical log data classification: Case study from the CCSD-MH , 2015 .

[27]  Watheq J. Al-Mudhafar Integrating Component Analysis & Classification Techniques for Comparative Prediction of Continuous & Discrete Lithofacies Distributions , 2015 .

[28]  Ted Bornemann,et al.  The Use of Real-Time and Time-Lapse Logging-While-Drilling Images for Geosteering and Formation Evaluation in the Breitbrunn Field, Bavaria, Germany , 2004 .

[29]  Watheq J. Al-Mudhafar,et al.  Integrating lithofacies and well logging data into smooth generalized additive model for improved permeability estimation: Zubair formation, South Rumaila oil field , 2019 .

[30]  Ian H. Witten,et al.  Data mining: practical machine learning tools and techniques, 3rd Edition , 1999 .

[31]  P. A. Dunn,et al.  Rapid and Consistent Identification of Stratigraphic Boundaries and Stacking Patterns in Well-logs - An Automated Process Utilizing Wavelet Transforms and Beta Distributions , 2017 .

[32]  Watheq J. Al-Mudhafar,et al.  Integrating well log interpretations for lithofacies classification and permeability modeling through advanced machine learning algorithms , 2017, Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology.

[33]  Marco Pirrone,et al.  Lithofacies Classification of Thin Layered Turbidite Reservoirs Through the Integration of Core Data and Dielectric Dispersion Log Measurements , 2014 .

[34]  Chih-Jen Lin,et al.  Training and Testing Low-degree Polynomial Data Mappings via Linear SVM , 2010, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[35]  Guochang Wang,et al.  Application of Artificial Intelligence on Black Shale Lithofacies Prediction in Marcellus Shale, Appalachian Basin , 2014 .

[36]  Akhil Datta-Gupta,et al.  Electrofacies Characterization and Permeability Predictions in Carbonate Reservoirs: Role of Multivariate Analysis and Nonparametric Regression , 1999 .

[37]  Wen Zhou,et al.  Evaluation of machine learning methods for formation lithology identification: A comparison of tuning processes and model performances , 2018 .

[38]  Leo Breiman,et al.  Random Forests , 2001, Machine Learning.