In search of the European Paradox: an international comparison of Europe's scientific performance and knowledge flows in information and communication technologies research

Abstract This article deals with the scientific performance of the European Union (EU) in what is now perhaps the most important enabling technology worldwide: information and communication technologies (ICT). The performance measures are based on the stock and flows of scientific knowledge embodied in research papers published in international scientific and technical journals. Quantitative data derived from these papers are used to examine and compare the performance of the EU science base with the US and Japan—two leading scientific nations in ICT research, and major competitors in ICT industries. These bibliometric indicators characterize and compare these three ICT research bases in terms of research output, international scientific quality, transnational knowledge flows, and domestic and international cooperation patterns. The analysis focuses on the key issue whether or not these data bear evidence of the perceived `European Paradox' which is, among others, characterized by a strong EU public sector science base coupled to a relatively weak R&D performance of EU firms. The findings provide empirical confirmation for the existence of this Paradox in both ICT research domains under investigation: computers and data processing, and telecommunications.

[1]  P. David,et al.  Toward a new economics of science , 1994 .

[2]  A. F. J. van Raan,et al.  Handbook of quantitative studies of science and technology , 1988 .

[3]  A. Jaffe.  Real Effects of Academic Research , 1989 .

[4]  Thed N. van Leeuwen,et al.  Scientific publication activity of industry in the Netherlands , 1996 .

[5]  A. Gambardella,et al.  Does technological convergence imply convergence in markets? Evidence from the electronics industry , 1998 .

[6]  Maryann P. Feldman,et al.  The Geographic Sources of Innovation: Technological Infrastructure and Product Innovation in the United States , 1994 .

[7]  Grahame F. Thompson,et al.  Globalization in Question. The International Economy and the Possibilities of Governance , 1996 .

[8]  Benoît Godin,et al.  Research and the practice of publication in industries , 1996 .

[9]  R. Vernon.  International investment and international trade in the product cycle , 1966 .

[10]  C. le Pair,et al.  THE CITATION GAP OF APPLICABLE SCIENCE , 1988 .

[11]  Paul Stoneman,et al.  Handbook of the economics of innovation and technological change , 1995 .

[12]  Diana Hicks,et al.  Japanese corporations, scientific research and globalization , 1994 .

[13]  K. Pavitt,et al.  Large Firms in the Production of the World's Technology: An Important Case of “Non-Globalisation” , 1991 .

[14]  Robert Pearce,et al.  R&D networks and innovation: decentralised product development in multinational enterprises , 1996 .

[15]  Luc Soete,et al.  European innovation policy for environmentally sustainable development: Application of a systems model of technical change , 1995 .

[16]  David P. Hamilton.  Research papers: who's uncited now? , 1991, Science.

[17]  E. Mansfield.  Academic Research Underlying Industrial Innovations , 1995 .

[18]  Nathan Rosenberg,et al.  Scientific instrumentation and university research , 1992 .

[19]  Diana Hicks,et al.  A Morphology of Japanese and European Corporate Research Networks , 1996 .

[20]  Lars Håkanson,et al.  Internationalization of R&D -- a survey of some recent research , 1993 .

[21]  Michel Callon,et al.  Is Science a Public Good? Fifth Mullins Lecture, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, 23 March 1993 , 1994 .

[22]  H. Grupp.  Spillover effects and the science base of innovations reconsidered: an empirical approach , 1996 .

[23]  D. Hicks.  Published Papers, Tacit Competencies and Corporate Management of the Public/Private Character of Knowledge , 1995 .