Contrast enhancement improves the representation of /ɛ/-like vowels in the hearing-impaired auditory nerve

This study examines the neural representation of the vowel /ɛ/ in the auditory nerve of acoustically traumatized cats and asks whether spectral modifications of the vowel can restore a normal neural representation. Four variants of /ɛ/, which differed primarily in the frequency of the second formant (F2), were used as stimuli. Normally, the rate-place code provides a robust representation of F2 for these vowels, in the sense that rate changes encode changes in F2 frequency [Conley and Keilson, J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 98, 3223 (1995)]. This representation is lost after acoustic trauma [Miller et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 105, 311 (1999)]. Here it is shown that an improved representation of the F2 frequency can be gained by a form of high-frequency emphasis that is determined by both the hearing-loss profile and the spectral envelope of the vowel. Essentially, the vowel was high-pass filtered so that the F2 and F3 peaks were amplified without amplifying frequencies in the trough between F1 and F2. This modification improved the quality of the rate and temporal tonotopic representations of the vowel and restored sensitivity to the F2 frequency. Although a completely normal representation was not restored, this method shows promise as an approach to hearing-aid signal processing.

[1]  P M Zurek,et al.  Consonant reception in noise by listeners with mild and moderate sensorineural hearing impairment. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[2]  S. Keilson,et al.  Rate representation and discriminability of second formant frequencies for /ε/‐like steady‐state vowels in cat auditory nerve , 1995 .

[3]  Eric D Young,et al.  Effects of high sound levels on responses to the vowel /ε/ in cat auditory nerve , 1998, Hearing Research.

[4]  Quentin Summerfield,et al.  The effect of enhanced spectral contrast on the internal representation of vowel-shaped noise , 1985 .

[5]  Francis M. Wiener,et al.  The Pressure Distribution in the Auditory Canal in a Progressive Sound Field , 1946 .

[6]  R D Hienz,et al.  Vowel discrimination in cats: thresholds for the detection of second formant changes in the vowel /epsilon/. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  A M Simpson,et al.  Spectral enhancement to improve the intelligibility of speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1990, Acta oto-laryngologica. Supplementum.

[8]  M. Liberman,et al.  Single-neuron labeling and chronic cochlear pathology. III. Stereocilia damage and alterations of threshold tuning curves , 1984, Hearing Research.

[9]  J. M. Pickett,et al.  Some Masking Effects Produced by Low-Frequency Vowel Formants in Persons with Sensorineural Hearing Loss , 1975 .

[10]  C. Turner,et al.  The relation between vowel recognition and measures of frequency resolution. , 1989, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[11]  Linda M. Thibodeau,et al.  Vowel identification and vowel masking patterns of hearing-impaired subjects. , 1986 .

[12]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter shapes in subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impairments. , 1986, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[13]  S P Bacon,et al.  Auditory processing of vowels by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1982, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[14]  C. Turner,et al.  High-frequency audibility: benefits for hearing-impaired listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  B C Moore,et al.  Auditory filter asymmetry in the hearing impaired. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[16]  A K Nábĕlek,et al.  The influence of talker differences on vowel identification by normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1992, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[17]  C D Geisler The responses of models of "high-spontaneous" auditory-nerve fibers in a damaged cochlea to speech syllables in noise. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[18]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Prediction of perceived phonetic distance from critical-band spectra: A first step , 1982, ICASSP.

[19]  M. Sachs,et al.  Encoding of steady-state vowels in the auditory nerve: representation in terms of discharge rate. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  B C Moore,et al.  Spectral feature enhancement for people with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on speech intelligibility and quality. , 1992, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[21]  M. Sachs,et al.  Representation of steady-state vowels in the temporal aspects of the discharge patterns of populations of auditory-nerve fibers. , 1979, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[22]  E D Young,et al.  Effects of acoustic trauma on the representation of the vowel "eh" in cat auditory nerve fibers. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  J J Zwislocki,et al.  Effects of hair cell lesions on responses of cochlear nerve fibers. I. Lesions, tuning curves, two-tone inhibition, and responses to trapezoidal-wave patterns. , 1980, Journal of neurophysiology.

[24]  B C Moore,et al.  Spectral contrast enhancement of speech in noise for listeners with sensorineural hearing impairment: effects on intelligibility, quality, and response times. , 1993, Journal of rehabilitation research and development.

[25]  Dennis H. Klatt,et al.  Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer , 1980 .

[26]  D D Dirks,et al.  Recognition of nonsense syllables by hearing-impaired listeners and by noise-masked normal hearers. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[27]  M. Leek,et al.  Intraspeech spread of masking in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners. , 1997, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[28]  Murray B. Sachs,et al.  Frequency-shaped amplification changes the neural representation of speech with noise-induced hearing loss , 1998, Hearing Research.

[29]  B. Delgutte,et al.  Speech coding in the auditory nerve: I. Vowel-like sounds. , 1984, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[30]  A R Palmer,et al.  Responses to speech signals in the normal and pathological peripheral auditory system. , 1993, Progress in brain research.

[31]  E D Young,et al.  Discriminability of vowel representations in cat auditory-nerve fibers after acoustic trauma. , 1999, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[32]  John Foster,et al.  Influences of formant bandwidth and auditory frequency selectivity on identification of place of articulation in stop consonants , 1985, Speech Commun..

[33]  P Dallos,et al.  Properties of auditory nerve responses in absence of outer hair cells. , 1978, Journal of neurophysiology.

[34]  L. Humes,et al.  The relation between identification and discrimination of vowels in young and elderly listeners. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  P G Stelmachowicz,et al.  Speech perception ability and psychophysical tuning curves in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1985, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[36]  D Byrne,et al.  Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification. , 1998, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[37]  J. C. Steinberg,et al.  Factors Governing the Intelligibility of Speech Sounds , 1945 .

[38]  M R Leek,et al.  Reduced frequency selectivity and the preservation of spectral contrast in noise. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[39]  M R Leek,et al.  The internal representation of spectral contrast in hearing-impaired listeners. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[40]  R A Levine,et al.  Auditory-Nerve Activity in Cats Exposed to Ototoxic Drugs and High-Intensity Sounds , 1976, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.