Evaluating the impact of the administrative procedure and the landscape policy on grid connected PV systems (GCPVS) on-floor in Spain in the period 2004–2008: To which extent a limiting factor?

The growth of the Spanish photovoltaic (PV) sector in the period 2004–2008 rendered Spain a prominent place among top worldwide countries. Yet, this growth was rather uneven across the different Spanish regions which raised the interest on the drivers ultimately effecting these disparities. Especially controversial were the arguments about the influence of the administrative procedure and the landscape policy on the development of GCPVS on-floor. This study therefore discloses both two elements and evaluates their impact in a group of PV prominent Spanish regions and Catalonia, the latter used as a benchmark because of its comprehensive and stringent regulation on landscape protection, which was accused by the PV industry of thwarting the development of the GCPVS on-floor. Both quantitative and qualitative analyses were carried out. In particular two indexes were elaborated to determine the consistency of the arguments pointing to the landscape protection policy as a decisive barrier to GCPVS growth. First, when the analysis is made in relative terms, the ranking of PV prominent regions changes and many of the differences vanish. Second, rather than the preeminence of a landscape protection policy what really matters for GCPVS on-floor growth is the administrative procedure and the processing enabling its implementation.

[1]  R. Haas,et al.  Fixed feed-in tariff versus premium: A review of the current Spanish system , 2012 .

[2]  Javier Faulin,et al.  The outlook for renewable energy in Navarre: An economic profile , 2006 .

[3]  Carlos Algora,et al.  A grid‐connected home PV installation in Madrid: the user's perspective , 2006 .

[4]  Dimitrios Papastefanakis,et al.  Renewable energy sources (RES) projects and their barriers on a regional scale: The case study of wind parks in the Dodecanese islands, Greece , 2009 .

[5]  Pablo del Río,et al.  Overcoming the lock-out of renewable energy technologies in Spain: The cases of wind and solar electricity , 2007 .

[6]  Pablo del Río,et al.  Policy analysis of authorisation procedures for wind energy deployment in Spain , 2011 .

[7]  Ernesto Cilleruelo,et al.  Public acceptance of renewables and the media: an analysis of the Spanish PV solar experience , 2011 .

[8]  J. Painuly.  Barriers to renewable energy penetration; a framework for analysis , 2001 .

[9]  Karlynn Cory,et al.  Innovative Feed-In Tariff Designs that Limit Policy Costs , 2011 .

[10]  Moisès Graells,et al.  Promotion of grid-connected photovoltaic systems in Spain: Performance analysis of the period 1998-2008 , 2010 .

[11]  Durmus Kaya.  Renewable energy policies in Turkey , 2006 .

[12]  Pablo Aragonés-Beltrán,et al.  An ANP-based approach for the selection of photovoltaic solar power plant investment projects , 2010 .

[13]  Víctor-Andrés Cloquell-Ballester,et al.  Development and validation of a multicriteria indicator for the assessment of objective aesthetic impact of wind farms , 2009 .

[14]  M. Socorro García-Cascales,et al.  Situations and problems of renewable energy in the Region of Murcia, Spain , 2010 .

[15]  Las plantas fotovoltaicas en el paisaje. Tipificación de impactos y directrices de integración paisajística , 2010 .

[16]  F. Dinçer,et al.  The analysis on photovoltaic electricity generation status, potential and policies of the leading countries in solar energy , 2011 .

[17]  Pieter Glasbergen,et al.  Implementation of wind energy in the Netherlands: the importance of the social–institutional setting , 2004 .

[18]  Víctor-Andrés Cloquell-Ballester,et al.  Aesthetic impact assessment of solar power plants : An objective and a subjective approach , 2009 .

[19]  Moisès Graells,et al.  Evaluating the new control structure for the promotion of grid connected photovoltaic systems in Spain: Performance analysis of the period 2008–2010 , 2013 .

[20]  Pablo del Río,et al.  The dynamic efficiency of feed-in tariffs: The impact of different design elements , 2012 .

[21]  Antonella Battaglini,et al.  Perception of risks in renewable energy projects: The case of concentrated solar power in North Africa , 2012 .

[22]  Thomas B Johansson,et al.  A Global Clean Cooking Fuel Initiative , 2004 .

[23]  Pablo del Río González,et al.  Ten years of renewable electricity policies in Spain: An analysis of successive feed-in tariff reforms , 2008 .

[24]  G. Garnero,et al.  The territorial and landscape impacts of photovoltaic systems: Definition of impacts and assessment of the glare risk , 2009 .

[25]  Pablo del Río,et al.  An integrated assessment of the feed-in tariff system in Spain , 2007 .

[26]  María José Prados,et al.  Renewable energy policy and landscape management in Andalusia, Spain: The facts , 2010 .

[28]  Eric Martinot,et al.  Promoting energy efficiency and renewable energy : GEF climate change projects and impacts , 2000 .

[29]  Adel Gastli,et al.  Assessment of renewable energy resources potential in Oman and identification of barrier to their significant utilization , 2009 .

[30]  Wim Turkenburg,et al.  Policies for renewable energy in the European Union and its member states: an overview , 2004 .

[31]  M. Díez-Mediavilla,et al.  Implementation of PV plants in Spain: A case study , 2010 .

[32]  Ralph Chapman,et al.  Distributed Small-Scale Wind in New Zealand: Advantages, Barriers and Policy Support Instruments , 2009 .

[33]  Pere Mir-Artigues,et al.  Support for solar PV deployment in Spain: Some policy lessons , 2012 .