Are you comfortable doing that?: acceptance studies of around-device gestures in and for public settings

Several research groups have demonstrated advantages of extending a mobile device's input vocabulary with in-air gestures. Such gestures show promise but are not yet being integrated onto commercial devices. One reason for this might be the uncertainty about users' perceptions regarding the social acceptance of such around-device gestures. In three studies, performed in public settings, we explore users' and spectators' attitudes about using around-device gestures in public. The results show that people are concerned about others' reactions. They are also sensitive and selective regarding where and in front of whom they would feel comfortable using around-device gestures. However, acceptance and comfort are strongly linked to gesture characteristics, such as, gesture size, duration and in-air position. Based on our findings we present recommendations for around-device input designers and suggest new approaches for evaluating the social acceptability of novel input methods.

[1]  David A. Forsyth,et al.  BeThere: 3D mobile collaboration with spatial input , 2013, CHI.

[2]  Hamed Ketabdar,et al.  MagiWrite: towards touchless digit entry using 3D space around mobile devices , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[3]  Shahram Izadi,et al.  SideSight: multi-"touch" interaction around small devices , 2008, UIST '08.

[4]  Xing-Dong Yang,et al.  Surround-see: enabling peripheral vision on smartphones during active use , 2013, UIST.

[5]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Mo!Games: evaluating mobile gestures in the wild , 2013, ICMI '13.

[6]  R. McCrae,et al.  An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. , 1992, Journal of personality.

[7]  Pourang Irani,et al.  Ad-binning: leveraging around device space for storing, browsing and retrieving mobile device content , 2013, CHI.

[8]  Ken Pfeuffer,et al.  Investigating mid-air pointing interaction for projector phones , 2012, ITS.

[9]  Eric Lecolinet,et al.  Clutch-free panning and integrated pan-zoom control on touch-sensitive surfaces: the cyclostar approach , 2010, CHI.

[10]  Michael Rohs,et al.  PalmSpace: continuous around-device gestures vs. multitouch for 3D rotation tasks on mobile devices , 2012, AVI.

[11]  David A. Forsyth,et al.  Around device interaction for multiscale navigation , 2012, Mobile HCI.

[12]  Michael Rohs,et al.  Hoverflow: exploring around-device interaction with IR distance sensors , 2009, Mobile HCI.

[13]  E. Hall,et al.  The Hidden Dimension , 1970 .

[14]  Andy Cockburn,et al.  Characterizing user performance with assisted direct off-screen pointing , 2011, Mobile HCI.

[15]  Fred D. Davis,et al.  User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models , 1989 .

[16]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Usable gestures for mobile interfaces: evaluating social acceptability , 2010, CHI.

[17]  Stephen A. Brewster,et al.  Multimodal mobile interactions: usability studies in real world settings , 2011, ICMI '11.

[18]  Sriram Subramanian,et al.  Would you do that?: understanding social acceptance of gestural interfaces , 2010, Mobile HCI.

[19]  Jonna Häkkilä,et al.  Tap input as an embedded interaction method for mobile devices , 2007, TEI.

[20]  Chris Harrison,et al.  Abracadabra: wireless, high-precision, and unpowered finger input for very small mobile devices , 2009, UIST '09.