Modelling Response Time Profiles in the Absence of Drug Concentrations: Definition and Performance Evaluation of the K–PD Model

The plasma concentration–time profile of a drug is essential to explain the relationship between the administered dose and the kinetics of drug action. However, in some cases such as in pre-clinical pharmacology or phase-III clinical studies where it is not always possible to collect all the required PK information, this relationship can be difficult to establish. In these circumstances several authors have proposed simple models that can analyse and simulate the kinetics of the drug action in the absence of PK data. The present work further develops and evaluates the performance of such an approach. A virtual compartment representing the biophase in which the concentration is in equilibrium with the observed effect is used to extract the (pharmaco)kinetic component from the pharmacodynamic data alone. Parameters of this model are the elimination rate constant from the virtual compartment (KDE), which describes the equilibrium between the rate of dose administration and the observed effect, and the second parameter, named EDK50 which is the apparent in vivo potency of the drug at steady state, analogous to the product of EC50, the pharmacodynamic potency, and clearance, the PK “potency” at steady state. Using population simulation and subsequent (blinded) analysis to evaluate this approach, it is demonstrated that the proposed model usually performs well and can be used for predictive simulations in drug development. However, there are several important limitations to this approach. For example, the investigated doses should extend from those producing responses well below the EC50 to those producing ones close to the maximum response, optimally reach steady state response and followed until the response returns to baseline. It is shown that large inter-individual variability on PK–PD parameters will produce biases as well as large imprecision on parameter estimates. It is also clear that extrapolations to dosage routes or schedules other than those used to estimate the parameters should be undertaken with great caution (e.g., in case of non-linearity or complex drug distribution). Consequently, it is advised to apply this approach only when the underlying structural PD and PK are well understood. In any case, K–PD model should definitively not be substituted for the gold standard PK–PD model when correct full model can and should be identified.

[1]  M. Danhof,et al.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modelling of the anti-lipolytic effects of the adenosine A1-receptor agonist N6-(P-sulfophenyl)adenosine (SPA) in rats , 1995 .

[2]  C. Meistelman,et al.  Comparison of Twitch Depression of the Adductor Pollicis and the Respiratory Muscles Pharmacodynamic Modeling without Plasma Concentrations , 1994, Anesthesiology.

[3]  M. Gibaldi,et al.  Dose-dependent decline of pharmacologic effects of drugs with linear pharmacokinetic characteristics. , 1972, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[4]  Lewis B. Sheiner,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: Application to d‐tubocurarine , 1979 .

[5]  Pharmacokinetic‐pharmacodynamic modelling of the anti‐lipolytic and anti‐ketotic effects of the adenosine A1‐receptor agonist N6‐(p‐sulphophenyl)adenosine in rats , 1997, British journal of pharmacology.

[6]  Lewis B. Sheiner,et al.  Semiparametric analysis of non-steady-state pharmacodynamic data , 2005, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[7]  Sylvie Chabaud,et al.  Clinical Trial Simulation Using Therapeutic Effect Modeling: Application to Ivabradine Efficacy in Patients with Angina Pectoris , 2002, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics.

[8]  Johan Gabrielsson,et al.  Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications , 2002 .

[9]  D. Fisher,et al.  Are Plasma Concentration Values Necessary for Pharmacodynamic Modeling of Muscle Relaxants? , 1997, Anesthesiology.

[10]  Michael G. M. Derks,et al.  Biphasic effect-time courses in man after formoterol inhalation: eosinopenic and hypokalemic effects and inhibition of allergic skin reactions. , 1997, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[11]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Simultaneous modeling of pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics: application to d-tubocurarine. , 1980, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[12]  Timothy Goggin,et al.  A semimechanistic and mechanistic population PK-PD model for biomarker response to ibandronate, a new bisphosphonate for the treatment of osteoporosis. , 2004, British journal of clinical pharmacology.

[13]  G. Tucker,et al.  Contribution of midazolam and its 1-hydroxy metabolite to preoperative sedation in children: a pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis. , 2002, British journal of anaesthesia.

[14]  R. Lalonde,et al.  Mixed‐effects modeling of the pharmacodynamic response to the calcimimetic agent R–568 , 1999, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[15]  Malcolm Rowland,et al.  Clinical pharmacokinetics : concepts and applications , 1989 .

[16]  A. Dahan,et al.  Pharmacodynamic Effect of Morphine-6-glucuronide versus Morphine on Hypoxic and Hypercapnic Breathing in Healthy Volunteers , 2003, Anesthesiology.

[17]  L B Sheiner,et al.  Kinetics of pharmacologic response. , 1982, Pharmacology & therapeutics.

[18]  Lewis B. Sheiner,et al.  A general conceptual model for non-steady state pharmacokinetic/Pharmacodynamic data , 2006, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[19]  W. Jusko,et al.  Modeling of dose–response–time data: four examples of estimating the turnover parameters and generating kinetic functions from response profiles , 2000, Biopharmaceutics & drug disposition.

[20]  Stuart L. Beal,et al.  Interaction between structural, statistical, and covariate models in population pharmacokinetic analysis , 1994, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[21]  J. Blanck,et al.  Kinetics of Drug Action , 1977, Handbuch der experimentellen Pharmakologie / Handbook of Experimental Pharmacology.

[22]  P. Jordan,et al.  Explicit solutions for a class of indirect pharmacodynamic response models , 2005, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..

[23]  L Aarons,et al.  A pharmacokinetic simulation model for ivabradine in healthy volunteers. , 2000, European journal of pharmaceutical sciences : official journal of the European Federation for Pharmaceutical Sciences.

[24]  G. Levy RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN RATE OF ELIMINATION OF TUBOCURARINE AND RATE OF DECLINE OF ITS PHARMACOLOGICAL ACTIVITY. , 1964, British journal of anaesthesia.

[25]  M. Danhof,et al.  A Combined Specific Target Site Binding and Pharmacokinetic Model to Explore the Non-linear Disposition of Draflazine , 1999, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[26]  J. Wade,et al.  Effect of misspecification of the absorption process on subsequent parameter estimation in population analysis , 1993, Journal of Pharmacokinetics and Biopharmaceutics.

[27]  W J Jusko,et al.  Physiologic indirect response models characterize diverse types of pharmacodynamic effects , 1994, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[28]  Johan Gabrielsson,et al.  Comprar Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Data Analysis: Concepts and Applications, Fourth Edition | Johan Gabrielsson | 9789197651004 | Informa Healthcare , 2007 .

[29]  G. Levy Kinetics of pharmacologic activity of succinylcholine in man. , 1967, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.