Using Web-Based Computer Games to Meet the Demands of Today’s High-Stakes Testing

Abstract The State of Virginia’s Standards of Learning (SOL) curriculum identifies specific objectives for each grade level in the subjects of reading, math, science, and social studies, and assesses student mastery of those objectives at targeted grade levels. The third-grade social studies curriculum and test represent a particular challenge for teachers because they cover information taught from kindergarten through third grade over a wide variety of topics, including Ancient Civilizations, Famous Americans, Civics, Famous Explorers, and U.S. Holidays. To assist one school in reviewing for the third-grade exam, the first author developed a Web-based review tool using the formats of the popular television game shows Who Wants to Be a Millionaire? and Jeopardy! that actively engaged students in reviewing social studies material. This mixed-method study used both a quasi-experimental and a qualitative approach. In the quasi-experimental design, scores of students in one third-grade class who used the game to review for the SOL test were compared to scores of students in another class who reviewed for the exam using more traditional methods. Students in the Web-review treatment were extensively observed, recorded, and analyzed. Students in the Web-based review treatment did score higher in the SOL exam than students in the control group, but not significantly so. However, more importantly, the games promoted higher order learning outcomes such as increased meaningful dialogue among students and the identification of student misconceptions, both of which contributed to deeper student understanding.

[1]  Ema Ushioda,et al.  The role of motivation , 1996 .

[2]  Mable B. Kinzie,et al.  Motivational and Achievement Effects of Learner Control over Content Review within CAI , 1992 .

[3]  M. Lepper.  Microcomputers in education: Motivational and social issues. , 1985 .

[4]  R. Clark.  Media will never influence learning , 1994 .

[5]  R. Clark.  Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media , 1983 .

[6]  John V. Dempsey,et al.  Instructional Gaming: Implications for Instructional Technology. , 1994 .

[7]  Seymour Papert,et al.  Mindstorms: Children, Computers, and Powerful Ideas , 1981 .

[8]  Terence C. Ahern,et al.  Targeting Motivation—Adapting Flow Theory to Instructional Design , 1999 .

[9]  Ellen R. Bialo,et al.  Report on the effectiveness of technology in schools , 1994 .

[10]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of computer-based instruction: An updated analysis. , 1991 .

[11]  Richard P. Swenson,et al.  The Role of Motivation in Computer-Assisted Instruction. , 1982 .

[12]  Richard E. Clark,et al.  Media and method , 1994 .

[13]  John Schacter,et al.  Does Computer Technology Improve Student Learning and Achievement? How, When, and under What Conditions? , 1999 .

[14]  Jan G. Hogle.  Considering Games as Cognitive Tools: In Search of Effective "Edutainment" , 1996 .

[15]  Different Cooperative Learning Procedures and Cross-Handicap Relationships , 1986, Exceptional children.

[16]  Robert E. Slavin.  Cooperative Learning: Can Students Help Students Learn?. , 1987 .

[17]  D. Malouf.  THE EFFECT OF INSTRUCTIONAL COMPUTER GAMES ON CONTINUING STUDENT MOTIVATION , 1988 .

[18]  Chen-Lin C. Kulik,et al.  Effectiveness of Computer-Based Education in Secondary Schools. , 1985 .

[19]  C. Douglas Wetzel,et al.  The Effectiveness of Games for Educational Purposes: A Review of Recent Research , 1992 .

[20]  J. Piaget,et al.  The Origins of Intelligence in Children , 1971 .

[21]  M. Hamza,et al.  TEACHING IN THE INFORMATION AGE: THE CREATIVE WAY! , 1999 .

[22]  David H. Jonassen,et al.  Computers as Mindtools for Schools: Engaging Critical Thinking , 1999 .

[23]  Howard J. Sullivan,et al.  Microcomputers and continuing motivation , 1987 .

[24]  R T Johnson,et al.  Collaborative Skill Instruction for Promoting Positive Interactions between Mentally Handicapped and Nonhandicapped Children , 1989, Exceptional children.