Revisiting "what is a document?"

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to provide a reconsideration of Michael Buckland's important question, “What is a document?”, analysing the point and purpose of definitions of “document” and “documentation”.Design/methodology/approach – Two philosophical notions of the point of definitions are contrasted: John Stuart Mill's concept of a “real” definition, purporting to specify the nature of the definiendum; and a concept of definition based upon a foundationalist philosophy of language. Both conceptions assume that a general, philosophical justification for using words as we do is always in order. This assumption is criticized by deploying Hilary Putnam's arguments against the orthodox Wittgensteinian interpretation of criteria governing the use of language. The example of the cabinets of curiosities of the sixteenth‐century English and European virtuosi is developed to show how one might productively think about what documents might be, but without a definition of a document.Findings – Other than ...

[1]  R. Porter.  Wonders and the order of nature , 1999 .

[2]  Martyn Lyons,et al.  The Nature of the Book , 2000 .

[3]  P. Rieder.  [Compte rendu de :] Wonders and the order of nature, 1150-1750 / Lorraine Daston et Katherine Park. New York : Zone Books, 1998 , 1999 .

[4]  Lorraine Daston,et al.  Wonders and the Order of Nature, 1150-1750 , 1998 .

[5]  Bernd Frohmann,et al.  Documentation Redux: Prolegomenon to (Another) Philosophy of Information , 2004, Libr. Trends.

[6]  Michael K. Buckland,et al.  Information as thing , 1991, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[7]  Christine Urquhart,et al.  A Document (Re)turn: Contributions from a Research Field in Transition , 2008, J. Documentation.

[8]  Bernd Frohmann.  The Role of Facts in Paul Otlet's Modernist Project of Documentation , 2007 .

[9]  J. L. Heilbron,et al.  Leviathan and the air-pump. Hobbes, Boyle, and the experimental life , 1989, Medical History.

[10]  Bernd Frohmann.  Discourse and Documentation: Some Implications for Pedagogy and Research , 2001 .

[11]  Colin Burke,et al.  European Modernism and the Information Society: Informing the Present, Understanding the Past , 2009, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[12]  Annelise Riles,et al.  Documents : artifacts of modern knowledge , 2006 .

[13]  Andrew Pickering,et al.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .

[14]  Lorraine Daston,et al.  The Factual Sensibility , 1988, Isis.

[15]  C. Mouffe,et al.  The Legacy of Wittgenstein: Pragmatism or Deconstruction , 2001 .

[16]  J. Mill.  A system of logic, ratiocinative and inductive : being a connected view of the principles of evidence, and the methods of scientific investigation. , 2011 .

[17]  G. Williams.  WHAT IS A DOCUMENT , 1948 .

[18]  M. Swann.  Curiosities and Texts: The Culture of Collecting in Early Modern England , 2001 .

[19]  Wiebe E. Bijker,et al.  Shaping Technology/Building Society: Studies in Sociotechnical Change ed. by Wiebe E. Bijker, John Law (review) , 1994, Technology and Culture.

[20]  Richard G. Landon.  The nature of the book: Print and knowledge in the making , 1999 .

[21]  Ronald E. Day,et al.  The Modern Invention of Information: Discourse, History, and Power , 2001 .

[22]  C. Sommerville,et al.  The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making , 1999 .

[23]  Olof Sundin.  Deflating information: From science studies to documentation , 2006, J. Assoc. Inf. Sci. Technol..

[24]  W. B. Rayward,et al.  On the cultural and intellectual context of European documentation in the early twentieth century , 2008 .

[25]  A. Pickering.  The mangle of practice : time, agency, and science , 1997 .