Ser and Thr Residues Modulate the Conformation of Pro-Kinked Transmembrane α-Helices

Functionally required conformational plasticity of transmembrane proteins implies that specific structural motifs have been integrated in transmembrane helices. Surveying a database of transmembrane helices and the large family of G-protein coupled receptors we identified a series of overrepresented motifs associating Pro with either Ser or Thr. Thus, we have studied the conformation of Pro-kinked transmembrane helices containing Ser or Thr residues, in both g+ and g- rotamers, by molecular dynamics simulations in a hydrophobic environment. Analysis of the simulations shows that Ser or Thr can significantly modulate the deformation of the Pro. A series of motifs, such as (S/T)P and (S/T)AP in the g+ rotamer and the TAP and PAA(S/T) motifs in the g- rotamer, induce an increase in bending angle of the helix compared to a standard Pro-kink, apparently due to the additional hydrogen bond formed between the side chain of Ser/Thr and the backbone carbonyl oxygen. In contrast, (S/T)AAP and PA(S/T) motifs, in both g+ and g-, and PAA(S/T) in g+ rotamers decrease the bending angle of the helix by either reducing the steric clash between the pyrrolidine ring of Pro and the helical backbone, or by adding a constrain in the form of a hydrogen bond in the curved-in face of the helix. Together with a number of available experimental data, our results strongly suggest that association of Ser and Thr with Pro is commonly used in transmembrane helices to accommodate the structural needs of specific functions.

[1]  M. Bansal,et al.  HELANAL: A Program to Characterize Helix Geometry in Proteins , 2000, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[2]  M. Cadene,et al.  X-ray structure of a voltage-dependent K+ channel , 2003, Nature.

[3]  Timothy B. Stockwell,et al.  The Sequence of the Human Genome , 2001, Science.

[4]  Shoshana J. Wodak,et al.  The TXP Motif in the Second Transmembrane Helix of CCR5 , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[5]  U. Gether.  Uncovering molecular mechanisms involved in activation of G protein-coupled receptors. , 2000, Endocrine reviews.

[6]  Gunnar von Heijne,et al.  Proline kinks in transmembrane α-helices☆ , 1991 .

[7]  P. Kraulis.  A program to produce both detailed and schematic plots of protein structures , 1991 .

[8]  T. Darden,et al.  Particle mesh Ewald: An N⋅log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems , 1993 .

[9]  G von Heijne,et al.  A turn propensity scale for transmembrane helices. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[10]  P. Kollman,et al.  A Second Generation Force Field for the Simulation of Proteins, Nucleic Acids, and Organic Molecules , 1995 .

[11]  Leonardo Pardo,et al.  Serine and Threonine Residues Bend α-Helices in the χ1 = g− Conformation , 2000 .

[12]  W. DeGrado,et al.  A thermodynamic scale for the helix-forming tendencies of the commonly occurring amino acids. , 1990, Science.

[13]  Mark S.P. Sansom,et al.  Hinges, swivels and switches: the role of prolines in signalling via transmembrane α-helices , 2000 .

[14]  H. Khorana,et al.  Requirement of Rigid-Body Motion of Transmembrane Helices for Light Activation of Rhodopsin , 1996, Science.

[15]  Pinak Chakrabarti,et al.  C—H⋯O hydrogen bond involving proline residues in α-helices , 1998 .

[16]  F. Cordes,et al.  Proline-induced distortions of transmembrane helices. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[17]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  The role of a conserved proline residue in mediating conformational changes associated with voltage gating of Cx32 gap junctions. , 1999, Biophysical journal.

[18]  Gert Vriend,et al.  GPCRDB information system for G protein-coupled receptors , 2003, Nucleic Acids Res..

[19]  B. Matthews,et al.  Intrahelical hydrogen bonding of serine, threonine and cysteine residues within alpha-helices and its relevance to membrane-bound proteins. , 1984, Journal of molecular biology.

[20]  J. Ballesteros,et al.  [19] Integrated methods for the construction of three-dimensional models and computational probing of structure-function relations in G protein-coupled receptors , 1995 .

[21]  H. Schiöth,et al.  The G-protein-coupled receptors in the human genome form five main families. Phylogenetic analysis, paralogon groups, and fingerprints. , 2003, Molecular pharmacology.

[22]  Berend Smit,et al.  Understanding molecular simulation: from algorithms to applications , 1996 .

[23]  L. Kelley,et al.  An automated approach for clustering an ensemble of NMR-derived protein structures into conformationally related subfamilies. , 1996, Protein engineering.

[24]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Statistical analysis of amino acid patterns in transmembrane helices: the GxxxG motif occurs frequently and in association with beta-branched residues at neighboring positions. , 2000, Journal of molecular biology.

[25]  K. Palczewski,et al.  Crystal Structure of Rhodopsin: A G‐Protein‐Coupled Receptor , 2002, Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology.

[26]  E A Merritt,et al.  Raster3D: photorealistic molecular graphics. , 1997, Methods in enzymology.

[27]  Leonardo Pardo,et al.  Influence of the environment in the conformation of alpha-helices studied by protein database search and molecular dynamics simulations. , 2002, Biophysical journal.

[28]  Shoshana J. Wodak,et al.  Activation of CCR5 by Chemokines Involves an Aromatic Cluster between Transmembrane Helices 2 and 3* , 2003, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[29]  E. Querol,et al.  Thr90 is a key residue of the bacteriorhodopsin proton pumping mechanism , 2001, FEBS letters.