Cortical bone facet spacers for cervical spine decompression: effects on intervertebral kinetics and foraminal area.

OBJECTIVE Nerve root decompression to relieve pain and radiculopathy remains one of the main goals of fusion-promoting procedures in the subaxial cervical spine. The use of allograft facet spacers has been suggested as a potential alternative for performing foraminotomies to increase the space available for the cervical nerve roots while providing segmental stiffening. Therefore, the goal of this cadaveric biomechanical study was to determine the acute changes in kinetics and foraminal area after the insertion of cortical bone facet spacers into the subaxial cervical spine. METHODS Allograft spacers (2 mm in height) were placed bilaterally into cadaveric cervical spine specimens (C2-T1, age of donors 57.5 ± 9.5 years, n = 7) at 1 (C4-5) and 3 (C3-6) levels with and without laminectomies and posterior lateral mass screw fixation. Standard stereophotogrammetry under pure moment loading was used to assess spinal kinetics. In addition, the authors performed 3D principal component analysis of CT scans to determine changes in foraminal cross-sectional area (FCSA) available for the spinal nerve roots. RESULTS Generally, the introduction of 2-mm-height facet spacers to the cervical spine produced mild, statistically insignificant reductions in motion with particular exceptions at the levels of implantation. No significant adjacent-level motion effects in any bending plane were observed. The addition of the posterior instrumentation (PI) to the intact spines resulted in statistically significant reductions in motion at all cervical levels and bending planes. The same kinetic results were obtained when PI was added to spines that also had facet spacers at 3 levels and spines that had been destabilized by en bloc laminectomy. The addition of 2-mm facet spacers at C3-4, C4-5, and C5-6 did produce statistically significant increases in FCSA at those levels. CONCLUSIONS The addition of allograft cervical facet spacers should be considered a potential option to accomplish indirect foraminal decompression as measured in this cadaveric biomechanical study. However, 2-mm spacers without supplemental instrumentation do not provide significantly increased spinal segmental stability.

[1]  T. Witham,et al.  Incidence and prognostic factors of c5 palsy: a clinical study of 1001 cases and review of the literature. , 2014, Neurosurgery.

[2]  Lee A. Tan,et al.  Effect of machined interfacet allograft spacers on cervical foraminal height and area. , 2014, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[3]  Kai-Ming G. Fu,et al.  Dysphagia following combined anterior-posterior cervical spine surgeries. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[4]  S. Berven,et al.  Percutaneous posterior cervical fusion with the DTRAX Facet System for single-level radiculopathy: results in 60 patients. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[5]  Paul C. Ivancic,et al.  Cervical neural space narrowing during simulated rear crashes with anti-whiplash systems , 2012, European Spine Journal.

[6]  A. Goel,et al.  Facetal distraction as treatment for single- and multilevel cervical spondylotic radiculopathy and myelopathy: a preliminary report. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[7]  Justin K Scheer,et al.  Biomechanical analysis of Goel technique for C1-2 fusion. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[8]  A. Goel Facet distraction-arthrodesis technique: Can it revolutionize spinal stabilization methods? , 2011, Journal of craniovertebral junction & spine.

[9]  G. Jull,et al.  The Influence of Cervical Traction, Compression, and Spurling Test on Cervical Intervertebral Foramen Size , 2009, Spine.

[10]  A. Goel Atlantoaxial joint jamming as a treatment for atlantoaxial dislocation: a preliminary report. Technical note. , 2007, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[11]  Bryan W Cunningham,et al.  Head-turned rear impact causing dynamic cervical intervertebral foramen narrowing: implications for ganglion and nerve root injury. , 2006, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[12]  D. Resnick,et al.  In Vivo Changes in the Neuroforaminal Size at Flexion-Extension and Axial Rotation Of The Cervical Spine In Healthy Persons Examined Using Kinematic Magnetic Resonance Imaging , 2001, Spine.

[13]  T. Albert,et al.  An in vivo analysis of the dimensional changes of the neuroforamen after anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion: a radiologic investigation. , 1997, Journal of spinal disorders.

[14]  Jung U. Yoo,et al.  The Role of Distraction in Improving the Space Available for the Cord in Cervical Spondylosis , 1995, Spine.