Hyperspectral Image Classification via Superpixel Spectral Metrics Representation

This letter proposes a new hyperspectral classification method that fuses superpixel spectral metrics and joint sparse representation (JSR), which is termed as superpixel spectral metrics representation (SSMR). Recently, superpixel segmentation has proven to be a powerful tool to exploit the spatial information of hyperspectral images (HSIs), since the size and shape of each superpixel can be adaptively changed in different structural textures. Moreover, spectral information divergence (SID) has superiority compared to other distance-based similarity measures, particularly when using with a JSR classifier. Taking the aforemementioned advantages into account, superpixel segmentation, SID, and JSR are availably combined to effectively utilize the spectral-spatial information of the HSI. The proposed SSMR method includes the following main steps. First, superpixel segmentation is utilized to divide the original map into several superpixels. Second, similarity metric SID among test samples in all superpixels and training samples are calculated. Next, the JSR model is employed to obtain the reconstruction residuals of each class. Then, a regularization parameter $\lambda$ is introduced to attain balance between JSR and SID. Finally, pixel's label is determined by the minimal total residual. Experimental results on the Indian Pines dataset show better performance than several well-known classification methods.

[1]  Xudong Jiang,et al.  Modular Weighted Global Sparse Representation for Robust Face Recognition , 2012, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[2]  Helmut Bölcskei,et al.  Robust Nonparametric Nearest Neighbor Random Process Clustering , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing.

[3]  Shutao Li,et al.  Extinction Profiles Fusion for Hyperspectral Images Classification , 2018, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[4]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Spectral–Spatial Hyperspectral Image Classification With Edge-Preserving Filtering , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[5]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Classification of Hyperspectral Images by Exploiting Spectral–Spatial Information of Superpixel via Multiple Kernels , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[6]  Shutao Li,et al.  Super-resolution of hyperspectral image via superpixel-based sparse representation , 2018, Neurocomputing.

[7]  Jon Atli Benediktsson,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Via Shape-Adaptive Joint Sparse Representation , 2016, IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Applied Earth Observations and Remote Sensing.

[8]  Rama Chellappa,et al.  Entropy rate superpixel segmentation , 2011, CVPR 2011.

[9]  Xiaofei Zhang,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification via Fusing Correlation Coefficient and Joint Sparse Representation , 2018, IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters.

[10]  Ming Zeng,et al.  Improving Classification of Slow Cortical Potential Signals for BCI Systems With Polynomial Fitting and Voting Support Vector Machine , 2018, IEEE Signal Processing Letters.

[11]  Trac D. Tran,et al.  Hyperspectral Image Classification Using Dictionary-Based Sparse Representation , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[12]  Weidong Yang,et al.  Remote sensing image classification based on random projection super-pixel segmentation , 2013, Other Conferences.

[13]  Chein-I. Chang Spectral information divergence for hyperspectral image analysis , 1999, IEEE 1999 International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium. IGARSS'99 (Cat. No.99CH36293).

[14]  Shutao Li,et al.  PCA-Based Edge-Preserving Features for Hyperspectral Image Classification , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.