Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas

Although research in moral psychology in the last decade has relied heavily on hypothetical moral dilemmas and has been effective in understanding moral judgment, how these judgments translate into behaviors remains a largely unexplored issue due to the harmful nature of the acts involved. To study this link, we follow a new approach based on a desktop virtual reality environment. In our within-subjects experiment, participants exhibited an order-dependent judgment-behavior discrepancy across temporally separated sessions, with many of them behaving in utilitarian manner in virtual reality dilemmas despite their nonutilitarian judgments for the same dilemmas in textual descriptions. This change in decisions reflected in the autonomic arousal of participants, with dilemmas in virtual reality being perceived more emotionally arousing than the ones in text, after controlling for general differences between the two presentation modalities (virtual reality vs. text). This suggests that moral decision-making in hypothetical moral dilemmas is susceptible to contextual saliency of the presentation of these dilemmas.

[1]  John Mikhail,et al.  Universal moral grammar: theory, evidence and the future , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[2]  Tania Lombrozo,et al.  The Role of Moral Commitments in Moral Judgment , 2009, Cogn. Sci..

[3]  M. Hauser,et al.  The Role of Conscious Reasoning and Intuition in Moral Judgment , 2006, Psychological science.

[4]  Ryan O. Murphy,et al.  Using Skin Conductance in Judgment and Decision Making Research , 2011 .

[5]  F. Cushman,et al.  Expertise in Moral Reasoning? Order Effects on Moral Judgment in Professional Philosophers and Non-Philosophers , 2012 .

[6]  M. Hauser,et al.  The role of emotion in moral psychology , 2009, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  M. Slater,et al.  The Use of Virtual Reality in the Study of People's Responses to Violent Incidents , 2009, Front. Behav. Neurosci..

[8]  A. Gomila,et al.  Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews Moral Dilemmas in Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Decision-making: a Principled Review , 2022 .

[9]  Olivier Oullier,et al.  Discrepancies between Judgment and Choice of Action in Moral Dilemmas , 2013, Front. Psychol..

[10]  Timothy D. Wilson,et al.  Prospection: Experiencing the Future , 2007, Science.

[11]  Joseph M. Paxton,et al.  Reflection and Reasoning in Moral Judgment , 2022 .

[12]  Soichiro Nomura,et al.  Autonomic arousal in cognitive conflict resolution , 2007, Autonomic Neuroscience.

[13]  F. Cushman.  Action, Outcome, and Value , 2013, Personality and social psychology review : an official journal of the Society for Personality and Social Psychology, Inc.

[14]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  Finding faults: How moral dilemmas illuminate cognitive structure , 2012, Social neuroscience.

[15]  M. Dawson,et al.  The electrodermal system , 2007 .

[16]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment , 2008, Cognition.

[17]  Eong Jinkyu,et al.  What is the Trolley Problem , 2015 .

[18]  Dean Mobbs,et al.  What we say and what we do: The relationship between real and hypothetical moral choices , 2012, Cognition.

[19]  Crystal L. Hoyt,et al.  Immersive Virtual Environment Technology as a Methodological Tool for Social Psychology , 2002 .

[20]  Andrew D. Engell,et al.  The Neural Bases of Cognitive Conflict and Control in Moral Judgment , 2004, Neuron.

[21]  J. Haidt.  The New Synthesis in Moral Psychology , 2007, Science.

[22]  O. Oullier,et al.  Disrupting the right prefrontal cortex alters moral judgement. , 2012, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[23]  D. DeSteno,et al.  Manipulations of Emotional Context Shape Moral Judgment , 2006, Psychological science.

[24]  K. Holyoak,et al.  The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning , 2012 .

[25]  Michael Schulte-Mecklenbeck,et al.  A Handbook of Process Tracing Methods for Decision Research. A Critical Review and User's Guide , 2011 .

[26]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  An fMRI Investigation of Emotional Engagement in Moral Judgment , 2001, Science.

[27]  Jonathan D. Cohen,et al.  Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment , 2009, Cognition.

[28]  Joshua D. Greene,et al.  A Dissociation Between Moral Judgments and Justifications , 2007 .

[29]  Ralph Hertwig,et al.  Time and moral judgment , 2011, Cognition.

[30]  C. Navarrete,et al.  Virtual morality: emotion and action in a simulated three-dimensional "trolley problem". , 2012, Emotion.

[31]  Giuseppe Di Pellegrino,et al.  A Psychophysiological Investigation of Moral Judgment after Ventromedial Prefrontal Damage , 2010, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[32]  Yoel Inbar,et al.  Emotion and moral judgment. , 2013, Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Cognitive science.

[33]  Jonas Nagel,et al.  Moral Judgment , 1921 .

[34]  Joshua D. Greene.  The Cognitive Neuroscience of Moral Judgment , 2010 .

[35]  D. Mook,et al.  In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .