Characterization of bone quality using computer-extracted radiographic features.

Both bone mineral density (BMD) and trabecular structure are important determinates of bone mechanical properties. However, neither BMD or trabecular structural features can completely explain the variations in bone mechanical properties. In this study, we combine BMD and bone structural features to characterize bone mechanical behavior. Radiographs were obtained from 34 femoral neck specimens excised during total hip arthroplasties. Each neck radiograph was digitized and a region of interest (ROI) was selected from the medial side of the femoral neck. Textural features, the global Minkoswski dimension and trabecular orientation, were extracted from each ROI image using Minkowski dimension analysis. The BMD of each specimen was measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) and subsequently normalized by bone size as measured from a standard pelvis radiograph. Mechanical testing was performed on the trabecular bone cubes machined from each femoral neck to yield bone mechanical properties. Multiple regression was performed to select the best features to predict bone mechanical properties. The results suggest that, using multiple predictors including normalized BMD structural features, and patient age, the coefficients of determination (R2) improved over the use of BMD alone. For bone strength, the R2 was improved from 0.24 using conventional BMD to 0.48 using a four-predictor model. Similar results were obtained in the prediction of Young's modulus, i.e., the R2 was improved from 0.25 to 0.55 in going from the model using conventional BMD to a four-predictor model. This study demonstrates the contributions of normalized BMD, structural features, and age to bone mechanical properties, and suggests a potential method for the noninvasive evaluation of bone mechanical properties.

[1]  D. Sartoris,et al.  Current and innovative methods for noninvasive bone densitometry. , 1990, Radiologic clinics of North America.

[2]  R. Shindell,et al.  Mineral and matrix contributions to rigidity in fracture healing. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[3]  Benoit B. Mandelbrot,et al.  Fractal Geometry of Nature , 1984 .

[4]  D B Burr,et al.  Non-invasive measurement of long bone cross-sectional moment of inertia by photon absorptiometry. , 1984, Journal of biomechanics.

[5]  F. Linde,et al.  X-ray quantitative computed tomography: the relations to physical properties of proximal tibial trabecular bone specimens. , 1989, Journal of biomechanics.

[6]  S M Bentzen,et al.  Mechanical strength of tibial trabecular bone evaluated by X-ray computed tomography. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[7]  S. Goldstein The mechanical properties of trabecular bone: dependence on anatomic location and function. , 1987, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  S A Goldstein,et al.  The relationship between the structural and orthogonal compressive properties of trabecular bone. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[9]  Leszek Wojnar,et al.  Image Analysis , 1998 .

[10]  D R Carter,et al.  New approaches for interpreting projected bone densitometry data , 1992, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[11]  J. Adams,et al.  Single and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry , 1997, European Radiology.

[12]  W C Hayes,et al.  Differences between the tensile and compressive strengths of bovine tibial trabecular bone depend on modulus. , 1994, Journal of biomechanics.

[13]  Michael H. Kutner Applied Linear Statistical Models , 1974 .

[14]  S C Cowin,et al.  The fabric dependence of the orthotropic elastic constants of cancellous bone. , 1990, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  R. Harba,et al.  Fractal organization of trabecular bone images on calcaneus radiographs , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[16]  Raj S. Acharya,et al.  Fractal analysis of bone structure with applications to osteoporosis and microgravity effects , 1995, Medical Imaging.

[17]  K Engelke,et al.  Noninvasive measurements of bone mass, structure, and strength: current methods and experimental techniques. , 1991, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[18]  S. Cummings,et al.  Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture , 1994, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[19]  P. Croucher,et al.  Assessment of cancellous bone structure: Comparison of strut analysis, trabecular bone pattern factor, and marrow space star volume , 1996, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[20]  M. Giger,et al.  Multifractal radiographic analysis of osteoporosis. , 1994, Medical physics.

[21]  W. J. Whitehouse The quantitative morphology of anisotropic trabecular bone , 1974, Journal of microscopy.

[22]  P. Rüegsegger,et al.  High-contrast resolution of CT images for bone structure analysis. , 1992, Medical physics.

[23]  G U Rao,et al.  Predicting femoral neck strength from bone mineral data. A structural approach. , 1990, Investigative radiology.

[24]  S. Majumdar,et al.  Application of fractal geometry techniques to the study of trabecular bone. , 1993, Medical physics.

[25]  S Katsuragawa,et al.  Image feature analysis and computer-aided diagnosis in digital radiography: detection and characterization of interstitial lung disease in digital chest radiographs. , 1988, Medical physics.

[26]  S. Goldstein,et al.  The direct examination of three‐dimensional bone architecture in vitro by computed tomography , 1989, Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

[27]  Petros Maragos,et al.  Fractal Signal Analysis Using Mathematical Morphology , 1994 .