Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) for Osteochondral Defects of the Talus: A Systematic Review

Autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) has been advocated for the management of talar osteochondral lesions (OCLs). This systematic review, which was conducted according to the PRISMA 2020 guidelines, investigated the clinical and imaging efficacy and safety of the AMIC technique in the management of OCLs of the talus. Only studies investigating AMIC for talar chondral defects that were published in peer-reviewed journals were considered. In September 2022, the following databases were accessed: PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and Embase. Data on the visual analogue scale (VAS), American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Score (AOFAS), Tegner activity scale, and Foot Function Index (FFI) were retrieved. To evaluate the morphological MRI findings, data obtained from the magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) scores were evaluated. Data on hypertrophy, failures, and revision surgeries were also collected. Data from 778 patients (39% women, 61% men) were collected. The mean length of the follow-up was 37.4 ± 16.1 months. The mean age of the patients was 36.4 ± 5.1 years, and the mean BMI was 26.1 ± 1.6 kg/m2. The mean defect size was 2.1 ± 1.9 cm2. Following the AMIC technique, patients demonstrated an improved VAS (p < 0.001), AOFAS (p < 0.001), and FFI (p = 0.02) score. The MOCART score also improved from the baseline (p = 0.03). No difference was observed in the Tegner score (p = 0.08). No graft delamination and hypertrophy were reported in 353 patients. 7.8% (44 of 564) of patients required revision surgeries, and 6.2% (32 of 515) of patients were considered failures. The AMIC technique could be effective in improving symptoms and the function of chondral defects of the talus.

[1]  J. Eschweiler,et al.  Fibrin glue does not assist migration and proliferation of chondrocytes in collagenic membranes: an in vitro study , 2022, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[2]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Limited medial osteochondral lesions of the talus associated with chronic ankle instability do not impact the results of endoscopic modified Broström ligament repair , 2022, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[3]  J. Eschweiler,et al.  Reliability of the MOCART score: a systematic review , 2021, Journal of Orthopaedics and Traumatology.

[4]  J. Eschweiler,et al.  Allograft Versus Autograft Osteochondral Transplant for Chondral Defects of the Talus: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis , 2021, The American journal of sports medicine.

[5]  J. Eschweiler,et al.  Surgical Management of Focal Chondral Defects of the Talus: A Bayesian Network Meta-analysis , 2021, The American journal of sports medicine.

[6]  F. Migliorini,et al.  AMIC for traumatic focal osteochondral defect of the talar shoulder: a 5 years follow-up prospective cohort study , 2021, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[7]  J. Eschweiler,et al.  Matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation versus autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for chondral defects of the talus: a systematic review. , 2021, British medical bulletin.

[8]  L. Weigelt,et al.  Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis With Lateral Ligament Stabilization for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus in Patients With Ankle Instability , 2021, Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine.

[9]  F. Springer,et al.  Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation with autologous bone grafting of osteochondral lesions of the talus in adolescents: patient-reported outcomes with a median follow-up of 6 years , 2021, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[10]  E. Mayo-Wilson,et al.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews , 2021, BMJ.

[11]  F. Springer,et al.  Re-operation rate after surgical treatment of osteochondral lesions of the talus in paediatric and adolescent patients , 2021, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[12]  F. Hildebrand,et al.  Osteochondrale Läsionen des Talus , 2021, Der Unfallchirurg.

[13]  J. Eschweiler,et al.  Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) Compared to Microfractures for Chondral Defects of the Talar Shoulder: A Five-Year Follow-Up Prospective Cohort Study , 2021, Life.

[14]  F. Migliorini,et al.  AMIC for Focal Osteochondral Defect of the Talar Shoulder , 2020, Life.

[15]  V. Valderrábano,et al.  Is there clinical evidence to support autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC) for chondral defects in the talus? A systematic review and meta-analysis. , 2020, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[16]  C. Laux,et al.  Long-term Prognosis After Successful Nonoperative Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: An Observational 14-Year Follow-up Study , 2020, Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine.

[17]  M. Salim,et al.  Early to medium term outcomes of osteochondral lesions of the talus treated by autologous matrix induced chondrogenesis (AMIC). , 2020, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[18]  V. Denaro,et al.  Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation and Mesenchymal Stem Cells for the Treatments of Chondral Defects Of The Knee- A Systematic Review. , 2020, Current stem cell research & therapy.

[19]  M. Richter,et al.  Comparison Matrix-Associated Stem Cell Transplantation (MAST) with Autologous Matrix Induced Chondrogenesis plus Peripheral Blood Concentrate (AMIC+PBC) in chondral lesions at the ankle-A clinical matched-patient analysis. , 2020, Foot and ankle surgery : official journal of the European Society of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[20]  J. Karlsson,et al.  Osteochondral lesions of the talus , 2019, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[21]  T. Ogut,et al.  One step treatment of talus osteochondral lesions with microfracture and cell free hyaluronic acid based scaffold combination , 2019, Acta orthopaedica et traumatologica turcica.

[22]  C. Pfirrmann,et al.  Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Clinical and Radiological 2- to 8-Year Follow-up Study , 2019, The American journal of sports medicine.

[23]  A. Fontana Autologous Membrane Induced Chondrogenesis (AMIC) for the treatment of acetabular chondral defect , 2019, Muscle Ligaments and Tendons Journal.

[24]  M. Prado,et al.  All-arthroscopic AMIC® (AT-AMIC) for the treatment of talar osteochondral defects: A short follow-up case series. , 2018, Foot.

[25]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Arthroscopic microfracture vs. arthroscopic autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis for the treatment of articular cartilage defects of the talus , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[26]  Timothy L. Kahn,et al.  Open reconstruction with autologous spongiosa grafts and matrix-induced chondrogenesis for osteochondral lesions of the talus can be performed without medial malleolar osteotomy , 2018, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[27]  Benjamin B. Rothrauff,et al.  Scaffold-Based Therapies: Proceedings of the International Consensus Meeting on Cartilage Repair of the Ankle , 2018, Foot & ankle international.

[28]  J. Villafañe,et al.  Return to Sport After Arthroscopic Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis for Patients With Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus. , 2017, Clinical journal of sport medicine : official journal of the Canadian Academy of Sport Medicine.

[29]  H. Hörterer,et al.  Functional Medium‐Term Results After Autologous Matrix‐Induced Chondrogenesis for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A 5‐Year Prospective Cohort Study , 2017, The Journal of foot and ankle surgery : official publication of the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons.

[30]  L. Sconfienza,et al.  Clinical and imaging outcome of osteochondral lesions of the talus treated using autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis technique with a biomimetic scaffold , 2017, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[31]  G. Kerkhoffs,et al.  Lesion Size Is a Predictor of Clinical Outcomes After Bone Marrow Stimulation for Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: A Systematic Review , 2017, The American journal of sports medicine.

[32]  M. Verhofstad,et al.  American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score: a study protocol for the translation and validation of the Dutch language version , 2017, BMJ Open.

[33]  R. D’Ambrosi,et al.  Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus and Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis: Is Age a Negative Predictor Outcome? , 2017, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[34]  R. D’Ambrosi,et al.  All-arthroscopic AMIC® (AT-AMIC®) technique with autologous bone graft for talar osteochondral defects: clinical and radiological results , 2016, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[35]  V. Valderrábano,et al.  Sports Activity After Reconstruction of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus With Autologous Spongiosa Grafts and Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis , 2016, The American journal of sports medicine.

[36]  A. Brunetti,et al.  Subchondral bone remodeling: comparing nanofracture with microfracture. An ovine in vivo study , 2016, Joints.

[37]  Atul Kumar,et al.  Collagen Promotes Higher Adhesion, Survival and Proliferation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2015, PloS one.

[38]  K. Young,et al.  In vivo animal study and clinical outcomes of autologous atelocollagen-induced chondrogenesis for osteochondral lesion treatment , 2015, Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research.

[39]  N. Südkamp,et al.  Clinical outcome and T2 assessment following autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis in osteochondral lesions of the talus , 2015, International Orthopaedics.

[40]  O. Bieri,et al.  Characterization of the collagen component of cartilage repair tissue of the talus with quantitative MRI: comparison of T2 relaxation time measurements with a diffusion-weighted double-echo steady-state sequence (dwDESS) , 2015, European Radiology.

[41]  Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence (January 2001) , 2014 .

[42]  S. Giannini,et al.  Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in the ankle joint , 2014, Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy.

[43]  O. Bieri,et al.  Delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage of the ankle joint: results after autologous matrix-induced chondrogenesis (AMIC)-aided reconstruction of osteochondral lesions of the talus. , 2013, Clinical radiology.

[44]  P. Behrens,et al.  Reviewing subchondral cartilage surgery: considerations for standardised and outcome predictable cartilage remodelling , 2013, International Orthopaedics.

[45]  V. Valderrábano,et al.  Reconstruction of Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus With Autologous Spongiosa Grafts and Autologous Matrix-Induced Chondrogenesis , 2013, The American journal of sports medicine.

[46]  K. Conrad,et al.  A review of the foot function index and the foot function index – revised , 2013, Journal of Foot and Ankle Research.

[47]  M. Shive,et al.  Depth of subchondral perforation influences the outcome of bone marrow stimulation cartilage repair , 2011, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[48]  M. Buschmann,et al.  Characterization of Subchondral Bone Repair for Marrow-Stimulated Chondral Defects and Its Relationship to Articular Cartilage Resurfacing , 2011, The American journal of sports medicine.

[49]  P. O'loughlin,et al.  Current Concepts in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Osteochondral Lesions of the Ankle , 2010, The American journal of sports medicine.

[50]  Wei Ouyang,et al.  Drilling and microfracture lead to different bone structure and necrosis during bone‐marrow stimulation for cartilage repair , 2009, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[51]  K. Park,et al.  Osteochondral Lesion of the Talus , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[52]  N. Maffulli,et al.  Faculty Opinions recommendation of Osteochondral lesion of the talus: is there a critical defect size for poor outcome? , 2009 .

[53]  William G. Rodkey,et al.  The Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Lysholm Score and Tegner Activity Scale for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries of the Knee , 2009, The American journal of sports medicine.

[54]  S. Giannini,et al.  Arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation in Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus , 2008, The American journal of sports medicine.

[55]  E. Berkson,et al.  Microfracture for osteochondral lesions of the ankle: outcome analysis and outcome predictors of 105 cases. , 2008, Arthroscopy : the journal of arthroscopic & related surgery : official publication of the Arthroscopy Association of North America and the International Arthroscopy Association.

[56]  N. Südkamp,et al.  Autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of retropatellar cartilage defects: clinical results referred to defect localisation , 2008, Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery.

[57]  J. George,et al.  The importance of early arthroscopy in athletes with painful cartilage lesions of the ankle: a prospective study of 61 consecutive cases , 2006, Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research.

[58]  S. Raikin,et al.  Osteochondral Lesions of the Talus: Change in MRI Findings Over Time in Talar Lesions Without Operative Intervention and Implications for Staging Systems , 2006, Foot & ankle international.

[59]  Jörg Haller,et al.  Magnetic resonance observation of cartilage repair tissue (MOCART) for the evaluation of autologous chondrocyte transplantation: determination of interobserver variability and correlation to clinical outcome after 2 years. , 2006, European journal of radiology.

[60]  P. Behrens,et al.  Matrixgekoppelte Mikrofrakturierung , 2005, Arthroskopie.

[61]  F. Djouad,et al.  Regenerative medicine through mesenchymal stem cells for bone and cartilage repair. , 2002, Current opinion in investigational drugs.

[62]  P. Bossuyt,et al.  Treatment Strategies in Osteochondral Defects of the Talar Dome: a Systematic Review , 2000, Foot & ankle international.

[63]  J. Wark,et al.  Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies , 2000, Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in sports.

[64]  K. Briggs,et al.  Microfracture technique forfull-thickness chondral defects: Technique and clinical results , 1997 .