Bayesian framework for robust seed-based correlation analysis.

PURPOSE One popular method of assessing brain functional connectivity (FC) is through seed-based correlation (SCA) analysis. One drawback of this method is when the seed location is varied slightly, the FC can vary dramatically. We propose a method superior to SCA, robust to variations in seed location, which confers a probabilistic interpretation. METHODS We introduce a probabilistic method which generates a cloud of highly connected voxels to determine a stable set of voxels connected to the seed location (SC-SCA). This cloud can generate a correlation map or a probabilistic map. The method is applied to the default mode network (DMN) based on a posterior cingulate cortex (PCC) seed, and the auditory network (AN) as validation on a smaller network. A Bayesian interpretation is demonstrated through performing a maximum a posteriori (MAP) estimation on the DMN. The advantages of the method are tested by performing stability analyses on its influential parameters. The method is extended to region-based SC-SCA, and then comparisons are made based on seed-based vs region-based versions of the methods SC-SCA vs traditional SCA. The statistical significance between the methods is assessed via a bootstrap method using the difference in medians of the standard deviation of the voxels for 16 subjects. RESULTS The proposed method, SC-SCA, is able to identify a set of regions - the DMN - that are known to be associated with and have high correlation with the PCC, and the method is also extensible to smaller networks as shown by its performance on the AN. Based on the certainty of the a priori distribution for MAP analysis, the method is able to identify regions with high probability of belonging to the DMN. The stability analyses demonstrated that substantial deviations from the initial seed locations in the sagittal, posterior transverse, and axial directions by ±10 mm do not cause substantial variation in the correlation network produced. Qualitative inspection of the average correlation maps garnered from the four methods showed that SC-SCA shows a larger amount of detail in FC connectivity as compared to SCA. Seed-based methods show higher detail and contrast in the maps in comparison with region-based methods. Quantitatively, the statistical tests between seed-based vs region-based and SC-SCA vs SCA revealed that there is no significant difference between the following methods: region-based SCA or region-based SC-SCA, and seed-based SC-SCA or region-based SC-SCA. However, there are statistically significant differences and advantages conferred between the following methods: seed-based SC-SCA over seed-based SCA, region-based SC-SCA over seed-based SCA, region-based SCA over seed-based SCA, and region-based SCA over seed-based SC-SCA. Finally, seed-based SC-SCA outperforms sphere-based SCA. CONCLUSIONS The proposed method offers several advantages over traditional SCA: robust single-seed FC estimation, novel Bayesian estimation capabilities, enhanced detail of brain structures, robustness to initial seed location, and enhanced consistency in the correlation maps generated. Region-based SC-SCA is equivalent or superior to all investigated methods, where seed-based SCA is inferior to all methods. The method confers improved single-seed SCA with the additional benefit of Bayesian estimation.

[1]  L. R. Dice Measures of the Amount of Ecologic Association Between Species , 1945 .

[2]  Karl J. Friston Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: A synthesis , 1994 .

[3]  B. Biswal,et al.  Functional connectivity in the motor cortex of resting human brain using echo‐planar mri , 1995, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[4]  Mark W. Woolrich,et al.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL , 2004, NeuroImage.

[5]  P. Fransson Spontaneous low‐frequency BOLD signal fluctuations: An fMRI investigation of the resting‐state default mode of brain function hypothesis , 2005, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Maurizio Corbetta,et al.  The human brain is intrinsically organized into dynamic, anticorrelated functional networks. , 2005, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[7]  Rajan S. Patel,et al.  A Bayesian approach to determining connectivity of the human brain , 2006, Human brain mapping.

[8]  Jagath C. Rajapakse,et al.  Learning functional structure from fMR images , 2006, NeuroImage.

[9]  Justin L. Vincent,et al.  Disruption of Large-Scale Brain Systems in Advanced Aging , 2007, Neuron.

[10]  R. Poldrack Region of interest analysis for fMRI. , 2007, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[11]  Juan Zhou,et al.  Learning effective brain connectivity with dynamic Bayesian networks , 2007, NeuroImage.

[12]  G. Glover,et al.  Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Major Depression: Abnormally Increased Contributions from Subgenual Cingulate Cortex and Thalamus , 2007, Biological Psychiatry.

[13]  Martin J. McKeown,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian network modeling of fMRI: A comparison of group-analysis methods , 2008, NeuroImage.

[14]  S. Petersen,et al.  The maturing architecture of the brain's default network , 2008, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[15]  M. Greicius,et al.  Resting-state functional connectivity reflects structural connectivity in the default mode network. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[16]  R. Buckner,et al.  Task-free presurgical mapping using functional magnetic resonance imaging intrinsic activity. , 2009, Journal of neurosurgery.

[17]  R. Müller,et al.  Aberrant functional connectivity in autism: Evidence from low-frequency BOLD signal fluctuations , 2009, Brain Research.

[18]  Arno Villringer,et al.  Resting developments: a review of fMRI post-processing methodologies for spontaneous brain activity , 2010, Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine.

[19]  M. P. van den Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: a review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity. , 2010, European neuropsychopharmacology : the journal of the European College of Neuropsychopharmacology.

[20]  Archana Venkataraman,et al.  Intrinsic functional connectivity as a tool for human connectomics: theory, properties, and optimization. , 2010, Journal of neurophysiology.

[21]  S. Rombouts,et al.  Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience Systems Neuroscience , 2022 .

[22]  M. Mintun,et al.  Resting-state functional MRI in depression unmasks increased connectivity between networks via the dorsal nexus , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[23]  M. V. D. Heuvel,et al.  Exploring the brain network: A review on resting-state fMRI functional connectivity , 2010, European Neuropsychopharmacology.

[24]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Advances and Pitfalls in the Analysis and Interpretation of Resting-State FMRI Data , 2010, Front. Syst. Neurosci..

[25]  Marisa O. Hollinshead,et al.  The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. , 2011, Journal of neurophysiology.

[26]  E. Brattico,et al.  Music and Emotions in the Brain: Familiarity Matters , 2011, PloS one.

[27]  A. Fleisher,et al.  Altered default mode network connectivity in alzheimer's disease—A resting functional MRI and bayesian network study , 2011, Human brain mapping.

[28]  Dave R. M. Langers,et al.  Hearing Without Listening: Functional Connectivity Reveals the Engagement of Multiple Nonauditory Networks During Basic Sound Processing , 2011, Brain Connect..

[29]  Ann K. Shinn,et al.  Abnormal Medial Prefrontal Cortex Resting-State Connectivity in Bipolar Disorder and Schizophrenia , 2011, Neuropsychopharmacology.

[30]  H. Neville,et al.  Altered Cross-Modal Processing in the Primary Auditory Cortex of Congenitally Deaf Adults: A Visual-Somatosensory fMRI Study with a Double-Flash Illusion , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  M. Greicius,et al.  Decoding subject-driven cognitive states with whole-brain connectivity patterns. , 2012, Cerebral cortex.

[32]  J. Morris,et al.  Loss of Intranetwork and Internetwork Resting State Functional Connections with Alzheimer's Disease Progression , 2012, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[33]  N. Volkow,et al.  Aging and Functional Brain Networks , 2011, Molecular Psychiatry.

[34]  Mark J. Lowe,et al.  The emergence of doing “nothing” as a viable paradigm design , 2012, NeuroImage.

[35]  J. Duyn,et al.  Time-varying functional network information extracted from brief instances of spontaneous brain activity , 2013, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[36]  Sara A. Schmidt,et al.  Default Mode, Dorsal Attention and Auditory Resting State Networks Exhibit Differential Functional Connectivity in Tinnitus and Hearing Loss , 2013, PloS one.

[37]  David M. Groppe,et al.  Neurophysiological Investigation of Spontaneous Correlated and Anticorrelated Fluctuations of the BOLD Signal , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  Mark Jenkinson,et al.  The minimal preprocessing pipelines for the Human Connectome Project , 2013, NeuroImage.

[39]  Nuri Erkut Kucukboyaci,et al.  Functional Connectivity of the Hippocampus in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: Feasibility of a Task-Regressed Seed-Based Approach , 2013, Brain Connect..

[40]  J. Shimony,et al.  Resting-State fMRI: A Review of Methods and Clinical Applications , 2013, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[41]  Daniel P. Kennedy,et al.  The Autism Brain Imaging Data Exchange: Towards Large-Scale Evaluation of the Intrinsic Brain Architecture in Autism , 2013, Molecular Psychiatry.

[42]  Y. Jeong,et al.  Influence of ROI selection on resting state functional connectivity: an individualized approach for resting state fMRI analysis , 2015, Front. Neurosci..

[43]  R. Bharath,et al.  Seizure Frequency Can Alter Brain Connectivity: Evidence from Resting-State fMRI , 2015, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[44]  Marina Vannucci,et al.  Bayesian models for functional magnetic resonance imaging data analysis , 2014 .

[45]  Enzo Tagliazucchi,et al.  The Voxel-Wise Functional Connectome Can Be Efficiently Derived from Co-activations in a Sparse Spatio-Temporal Point-Process , 2016, Front. Neurosci..

[46]  Vince D. Calhoun,et al.  The connectivity domain: Analyzing resting state fMRI data using feature-based data-driven and model-based methods , 2016, NeuroImage.

[47]  César F. Lima,et al.  Roles of Supplementary Motor Areas in Auditory Processing and Auditory Imagery , 2016, Trends in Neurosciences.

[48]  Margot J. Taylor,et al.  Default Mode Network Oscillatory Coupling Is Increased Following Concussion , 2018, Front. Neurol..

[49]  G. Lohmann,et al.  The auditory cortex hosts network nodes influential for emotion processing: An fMRI study on music-evoked fear and joy , 2018, PloS one.

[50]  Lingling Zhu,et al.  Cryptotanshinone Attenuates Oxygen-Glucose Deprivation/ Recovery-Induced Injury in an in vitro Model of Neurovascular Unit , 2019, Front. Neurol..