Drop size effect on contact angle explained by nonextensive thermodynamics. Young's equation revisited.

We applied the concepts of nonextensive thermodynamics [Turmine et al., J. Phys. Chem. B 108 (2004) 18980], to describe the equilibrium of a liquid drop placed on a solid substrate. This approach provides a consistent formal framework for analyzing the contact angle according to the nature and structure of the substrate, and also the size of the drops. The introduction, for the solid/liquid interface, of the concept of "fuzzy interface" characterized by a thermodynamic dimension, different from 2/3 (surface) allowed description of the case of substrates with ill-defined geometry (such as porous, structured systems, fractal structure systems, etc.) and straightforward explanation of the phenomenon of super hydrophobicity without using a layer of trapped air in possible anfractuosities. The application of the nonextensive thermodynamics relationships, allowed explanation of all the usual behaviors described in the literature (Young, modified Young, Wenzel, Cassie-Baxter) including the case of the composite interfaces made of materials with different natures and spatial structures (smooth, rough, homogeneous and heterogeneous surfaces). We show that the contact angle can vary with the drop volume according to a power law, and this was validated against values published in the literature. This study also has consequences for the relations between "thermodynamic dimension" and "fractal dimension."

[1]  A. Gerson The role of fuzzy interfaces in the nucleation, growth and agglomeration of aluminum hydroxide in concentrated caustic solutions , 2001 .

[2]  S. Siboni,et al.  The determination of a ‘stable-equilibrium’ contact angle on heterogeneous and rough surfaces , 2002 .

[3]  R. Gretz The line-tension effect in heterogeneous nucleation , 1966 .

[4]  D. Kwok,et al.  Measuring and interpreting contact angles: a complex issue , 1998 .

[5]  Tomohiro Onda,et al.  Super-Water-Repellent Fractal Surfaces , 1995 .

[6]  R. Aveyard,et al.  Liquid lenses at fluid/fluid interfaces , 1997 .

[7]  I. Saguy,et al.  Contact angle measurement on rough surfaces. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[8]  R. Good,et al.  The effect of drop size on contact angle , 1979 .

[9]  A. W. Neumann,et al.  On the question of rate-dependence of contact angles , 2006 .

[10]  M. Podowski,et al.  Theoretical analysis on the effect of liquid droplet geometry on contact angle , 2005 .

[11]  The validity of Cassie's law: a simple exercise using a simplified model. , 2005, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[12]  Dongqing Li,et al.  Determination of line tension from the drop size dependence of contact angles , 1990 .

[13]  Brandon,et al.  Simulation of Contact Angle Hysteresis on Chemically Heterogeneous Surfaces , 1996, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[14]  A. Amirfazli,et al.  Drop size dependence of contact angles for liquid tin on silica surface: line tension and its correlation with solid–liquid interfacial tension , 1998 .

[15]  R. N. Wenzel RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER , 1936 .

[16]  Yongan Gu Drop size dependence of contact angles of oil drops on a solid surface in water , 2001 .

[17]  Rolf Mülhaupt,et al.  Fuzzy set approach for fitting a continuous response surface in adhesion formulation , 1997 .

[18]  A. W. Neumann,et al.  Generalization of the classical theory of capillarity , 1977 .

[19]  R. Gretz Line‐Tension Effect in a Surface Energy Model of a Cap‐Shaped Condensed Phase , 1966 .

[20]  A. DeSimone,et al.  Wetting of rough surfaces: a homogenization approach , 2005, Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[21]  S. Vafaei,et al.  Analysis of the relationship between liquid droplet size and contact angle. , 2005, Advances in colloid and interface science.

[22]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Wetting on Hydrophobic Rough Surfaces: To Be Heterogeneous or Not To Be? , 2003 .

[23]  D. Kwok,et al.  Contact angle interpretation: re-evaluation of existing contact angle data , 2000 .

[24]  A. Amirfazli,et al.  Line Tension Measurements through Drop Size Dependence of Contact Angle. , 1998, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[25]  H. Jacobasch,et al.  Contact angle measurements and contact angle interpretation : 1. Contact angle measurements by axisymmetric drop shape analysis and a goniometer sessile drop technique , 1997 .

[26]  Randy D. Hazlett,et al.  Fractal applications: Wettability and contact angle , 1990 .

[27]  Mireille Turmine,et al.  Nonextensive Approach to Thermodynamics: Analysis and Suggestions, and Application to Chemical Reactivity , 2004 .

[28]  Daniel Y. Kwok,et al.  Contact angle interpretation in terms of solid surface tension , 2000 .

[29]  Hideo Notsu,et al.  Super-hydrophobic/super-hydrophilic patterning of gold surfaces by photocatalytic lithography , 2005 .

[30]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  CONTACT ANGLE HYSTERESIS ON HETEROGENEOUS SMOOTH SURFACES , 1994 .

[31]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Partial wetting of chemically patterned surfaces: the effect of drop size. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[32]  A. Marmur Line tension effect on contact angles: Axisymmetric and cylindrical systems with rough or heterogeneous solid surfaces , 1998 .

[33]  R. Pogreb,et al.  Micrometrically scaled textured metallic hydrophobic interfaces validate the Cassie-Baxter wetting hypothesis. , 2006, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[34]  A. Milchev,et al.  Wetting behavior of nanodroplets: The limits of Young's rule validity , 2001 .

[35]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Soft contact: measurement and interpretation of contact angles. , 2006, Soft matter.

[36]  Daniel Y. Kwok,et al.  Contact angle measurement and contact angle interpretation , 1999 .

[37]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  The Lotus effect: superhydrophobicity and metastability. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[38]  Tröger,et al.  Determination of the Surface Tension of Microporous Membranes Using Contact Angle Measurements , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[39]  P. Roura,et al.  Local thermodynamic derivation of Young's equation. , 2004, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[40]  J. Drelich,et al.  Mineral matter distribution on coal surface and its effect on coal wettability. , 2002, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[41]  D. Quéré,et al.  On water repellency , 2005 .

[42]  P. Roura,et al.  Thermodynamic derivations of the mechanical equilibrium conditions for fluid surfaces: Young’s and Laplace’s equations , 2005 .

[43]  S. S. Susnar,et al.  Lens size dependence of contact angle and the line tension of the dodecane-water-air system , 1997 .

[44]  A. Amirfazli,et al.  Measurements of Line Tension for Solid−Liquid−Vapor Systems Using Drop Size Dependence of Contact Angles and Its Correlation with Solid−Liquid Interfacial Tension , 2000 .

[45]  K. Binder,et al.  Nanodroplets on a solid plane: wetting and spreading in a Monte Carlo simulation , 2002 .

[46]  Rafael Tadmor,et al.  Line energy and the relation between advancing, receding, and young contact angles. , 2004, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[47]  A. Neumann,et al.  The dependence of contact angles on drop size and line tension , 1987 .

[48]  F. Porcheron,et al.  Mean-field theory of liquid droplets on roughened solid surfaces: application to superhydrophobicity. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[49]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Equilibrium contact angles : theory and measurement , 1996 .

[50]  C. Tsallis Entropic nonextensivity: a possible measure of complexity , 2000, cond-mat/0010150.

[51]  T. Young III. An essay on the cohesion of fluids , 1805, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London.

[52]  Marmur Line Tension and the Intrinsic Contact Angle in Solid-Liquid-Fluid Systems , 1997, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[53]  A. Amirfazli,et al.  Determination of line tension for systems near wetting. , 2003, Journal of colloid and interface science.

[54]  K. Graf,et al.  Is There a General Equation of State Approach for Interfacial Tensions , 2000 .

[55]  J. Drelich The significance and magnitude of the line tension in three-phase (solid-liquid-fluid) systems , 1996 .

[56]  Abraham Marmur,et al.  Underwater superhydrophobicity: theoretical feasibility. , 2006, Langmuir : the ACS journal of surfaces and colloids.

[57]  H. Schulze,et al.  Some new observations on line tension of microscopic droplets , 1999 .

[58]  G. Palasantzas,et al.  WETTING ON ROUGH SURFACES , 2001 .

[59]  R. Lipowsky,et al.  Contact Angles on Heterogeneous Surfaces: A New Look at Cassie's and Wenzel's Laws , 1998, cond-mat/9809089.

[60]  A. Perwuelz,et al.  Determination of surface heterogeneity by contact angle measurements on glassfibres coated with different sizings , 1999 .

[61]  A. Neumann,et al.  Correlation of Line Tension and Solid-Liquid Interfacial Tension from the Measurement of Drop Size Dependence of Contact Angles , 1995 .

[62]  Tomohiro Onda,et al.  Super Water-Repellent Surfaces Resulting from Fractal Structure , 1996 .

[63]  A. Amirfazli,et al.  Status of the three-phase line tension: a review. , 2004, Advances in colloid and interface science.