Ecological risk assessment ought to make predictions about the likely effects of chemical contaminants on populations and ecosystems. However, current procedures either make these links on the basis of oversimplified approaches that obscure the relationship between what is measured in ecotoxicological tests and what we are trying to protect or are too demanding in terms of both data and understanding to be used practically and routinely. Here we develop an approach that uses simplified life-history models to make explicit and ecologically relevant links between test results and their implications for population dynamics and explore the possibility of extending this to an appreciation of ecosystem effects. These models also make a number of simplifying assumptions but in being explicit they are open to challenge and elaboration, and we argue that, in general, the assumptions are usually precautionary. The development of these models in itself gives some nonintuitive insights into the theory of ecotoxicological responses, and we illustrate the practical application of the theory using a number of hypothetical case studies.
[1]
R. Sibly,et al.
A Physiological Basis of Population Processes: Ecotoxicological Implications
,
1990
.
[2]
Jan E. Kammenga,et al.
Stress induced fitness reduction is not determined by the most sensitive life-cycle trait.
,
1996
.
[3]
Connie Wagner,et al.
Estimation of ecotoxicological protection levels from NOEC toxicity data
,
1991
.
[4]
Graeme Caughley,et al.
Directions in conservation biology
,
1994
.
[5]
W Slob,et al.
Confidence limits for hazardous concentrations based on logistically distributed NOEC toxicity data.
,
1993,
Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.
[6]
J. David Allan,et al.
Life Table Evaluation of Chronic Exposure to a Pesticide
,
1981
.
[7]
Sebastiaan A.L.M. Kooijman,et al.
An alternative for NOEC exists, but the standard model has to be abandoned first
,
1996
.