Tree-structured prediction for censored survival data and the Cox model.

Prediction trees for the analysis of survival data are discussed. It is shown that trees are useful not only in summarizing the prognostic information contained in a set of covariates (prognostic classification), but also in detecting and displaying treatment-covariates interactions (subgroup analysis). The RECPAM approach to tree-growing is outlined; prognostic classification and subgroup analysis are then formulated within the RECPAM framework and on the basis of the Cox proportional hazards models with a priori strata. Two examples of data analysis are presented. The issue of cross-validation is discussed in relation to computationally cheaper model selection criteria.

[1]  Antonio Ciampi,et al.  Recursive Partition: A Versatile Method for Exploratory-Data Analysis in Biostatistics , 1987 .

[2]  A Ciampi,et al.  An approach to classifying prognostic factors related to survival experience for non‐Hodgkin's lymphoma patients: Based on a series of 982 patients: 1967–1975 , 1981, Cancer.

[3]  A. Ciampi.  Generalized regression trees , 1991 .

[4]  M. LeBlanc,et al.  Relative risk trees for censored survival data. , 1992, Biometrics.

[5]  Mark R. Segal,et al.  Empirical Comparison of Approaches to Forming Strata: Using Classification Trees to Adjust for Covariates , 1989 .

[6]  R A Olshen,et al.  Prognostic significance of actual dose intensity in diffuse large-cell lymphoma: results of a tree-structured survival analysis. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[7]  R B Davis,et al.  Exponential survival trees. , 1989, Statistics in medicine.

[8]  Antonio Ciampi,et al.  Pruning regression trees for censored survival data: the recpam approach , 1989 .

[9]  J F Lawless,et al.  Regression and recursive partition strategies in the analysis of medical survival data. , 1988, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[10]  A Ciampi,et al.  RECPAM: a computer program for recursive partition amalgamation for censored survival data and other situations frequently occurring in biostatistics. II. Applications to data on small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCCL). , 1989, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.

[11]  U Sagman,et al.  Small-cell carcinoma of the lung: derivation of a prognostic staging system. , 1991, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[12]  Mark R. Segal,et al.  Regression Trees for Censored Data , 1988 .

[13]  K. Gabriel,et al.  SIMULTANEOUS TEST PROCEDURES-SOME THEORY OF MULTIPLE COMPARISONS' , 1969 .

[14]  J. Crowley,et al.  Determinants of improved outcome in small-cell lung cancer: an analysis of the 2,580-patient Southwest Oncology Group data base. , 1990, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[15]  A. Ciampi,et al.  Stratification by stepwise regression, correspondence analysis and recursive partition: A comparison of three methods of analysis for survival data with covaria , 1986 .

[16]  A Morabito,et al.  Prognostic factors and risk groups: some results given by using an algorithm suitable for censored survival data. , 1983, Statistics in medicine.

[17]  Jonathan J. Shuster,et al.  Prognostic factors in childhood T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a Pediatric Oncology Group study , 1990 .

[18]  T. Caliński,et al.  Clustering means in ANOVA by simultanuous testing , 1985 .

[19]  J. Kalbfleisch,et al.  The Statistical Analysis of Failure Time Data , 1980 .

[20]  A Ciampi,et al.  RECPAM: a computer program for recursive partition and amalgamation for censored survival data and other situations frequently occurring in biostatistics. I. Methods and program features. , 1988, Computer methods and programs in biomedicine.