Impact on Image Noise of Incorporating Detector Blurring Into Image Reconstruction for a Small Animal PET Scanner

We study the noise characteristics of an image reconstruction algorithm that incorporates a model of the non-stationary detector blurring (DB) for a mouse-imaging positron emission tomography (PET) scanner. The algorithm uses ordered subsets expectation maximization (OSEM) image reconstruction, which is used to suppress statistical noise. Including the non-stationary detector blurring in the reconstruction process [OSEM(DB)] has been shown to increase contrast in images reconstructed from measured data acquired on the fully-3D MiCES PET scanner developed at the University of Washington. As an extension, this study uses simulation studies with a fully-3D acquisition mode and our proposed FORE+ OSEM(DB) reconstruction process to evaluate the volumetric contrast versus noise trade-offs of this approach. Multiple realizations were simulated to estimate the true noise properties of the algorithm. The results show that incorporation of detector blurring FORE+OSEM(DB) into the reconstruction process improves the contrast/noise trade-offs compared to FORE +OSEM in a radially dependent manner. Adding post reconstruction 3D Gaussian smoothing to FORE +OSEM and FORE +OSEM(DB) reduces the contrast versus noise advantages of FORE+ OSEM(DB).

[1]  R. Leahy,et al.  Accurate geometric and physical response modelling for statistical image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1996, 1996 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record.

[2]  Donald W. Wilson,et al.  Noise properties of the EM algorithm. I. Theory , 1994 .

[3]  Thomas K. Lewellen,et al.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3-D whole body PET , 2006, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[4]  C.A. Bouman,et al.  Quantitative comparison of FBP, EM, and Bayesian reconstruction algorithms for the IndyPET scanner , 2003, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[5]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Resolution and noise properties of MAP reconstruction for fully 3-D PET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[6]  G. Gindi,et al.  Noise analysis of MAP-EM algorithms for emission tomography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.

[7]  R. Leahy,et al.  High-resolution 3D Bayesian image reconstruction using the microPET small-animal scanner. , 1998, Physics in medicine and biology.

[8]  T.K. Lewellen,et al.  System integration of the MiCES small animal PET scanner , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[9]  Carole Lartizien,et al.  Simulating whole-body PET scanning with rapid analytical methods , 1999, 1999 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium. Conference Record. 1999 Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.99CH37019).

[10]  P.E. Kinahan,et al.  Modeling and incorporation of system response functions in 3D whole body PET , 2004, IEEE Symposium Conference Record Nuclear Science 2004..

[11]  R. Lecomte,et al.  Detector response models for statistical iterative image reconstruction in high resolution PET , 1998, 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record. 1998 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium and Medical Imaging Conference (Cat. No.98CH36255).

[12]  Jae-Seung Kim,et al.  Impact of system design parameters on image figures of merit for a mouse PET scanner , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[13]  M. Casey,et al.  PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science.

[14]  S. E. Derenzo,et al.  Precision measurement of annihilation point spread distributions for medically important positron emitters , 1979 .

[15]  Zhengrong Liang,et al.  Detector response restoration in image reconstruction of high resolution positron emission tomography , 1994, IEEE Trans. Medical Imaging.

[16]  Simon R. Cherry,et al.  Comparison of 3-D maximum a posteriori and filtered backprojection algorithms for high-resolution animal imaging with microPET , 2000, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[17]  L. J. Thomas,et al.  Noise and Edge Artifacts in Maximum-Likelihood Reconstructions for Emission Tomography , 1987, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[18]  Paul E Kinahan,et al.  Pragmatic fully 3D image reconstruction for the MiCES mouse imaging PET scanner. , 2004, Physics in medicine and biology.

[19]  Richard M. Leahy,et al.  Statistical approaches in quantitative positron emission tomography , 2000, Stat. Comput..